ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Chronic Chest Pain-Noncardiac Etiology Unlikely-Low to Intermediate Probability of Coronary Artery Disease.

[1]  C. Terkelsen,et al.  Computed tomography derived fractional flow reserve testing in stable patients with typical angina pectoris: influence on downstream rate of invasive coronary angiography , 2017, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[2]  D. Morgan,et al.  Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography vs Functional Stress Testing for Patients With Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2017, JAMA internal medicine.

[3]  G. Feuchtner,et al.  The high-risk criteria low-attenuation plaque <60 HU and the napkin-ring sign are the most powerful predictors of MACE: a long-term follow-up study , 2017, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[4]  M. Pencina,et al.  Prognostic Value of Noninvasive Cardiovascular Testing in Patients With Stable Chest Pain: Insights From the PROMISE Trial (Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain) , 2017, Circulation.

[5]  D. Berman,et al.  Coronary revascularization vs. medical therapy following coronary-computed tomographic angiography in patients with low-, intermediate- and high-risk coronary artery disease: results from the CONFIRM long-term registry , 2017, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[6]  F. Rybicki,et al.  CAD-RADS™: Coronary Artery Disease - Reporting and Data System: An Expert Consensus Document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). Endorsed by the American College of Car , 2016, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[7]  Matthias Gutberlet,et al.  1-Year Outcomes of FFRCT-Guided Care in Patients With Suspected Coronary Disease: The PLATFORM Study. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[8]  E. V. van Beek,et al.  Use of Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography to Guide Management of Patients With Coronary Disease , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  K. Nieman,et al.  Calcium imaging and selective computed tomography angiography in comparison to functional testing for suspected coronary artery disease: the multicentre, randomized CRESCENT trial. , 2016, European Heart Journal.

[10]  R. Cury,et al.  PROMISE of Coronary CT Angiography: Precise and Accurate Diagnosis and Prognosis in Coronary Artery Disease , 2016, Southern medical journal.

[11]  J. Cornel,et al.  Independent prognostic value of coronary artery calcium score and coronary computed tomography angiography in an outpatient cohort of low to intermediate risk chest pain patients , 2016, Netherlands Heart Journal.

[12]  D. Newby,et al.  Diagnostic Strategies for the Evaluation of Chest Pain: Clinical Implications From SCOT-HEART and PROMISE. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  D. Newby,et al.  Coronary CT Angiography as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Tool: Perspectives from the SCOT-HEART Trial , 2016, Current Cardiology Reports.

[14]  R. Gibbons,et al.  Use of Echocardiography in Olmsted County Outpatients With Chest Pain and Normal Resting Electrocardiograms Seen at Mayo Clinic Rochester. , 2015, Mayo Clinic proceedings.

[15]  Matthias Gutberlet,et al.  Clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve by computed tomographic angiography-guided diagnostic strategies vs. usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the prospective longitudinal trial of FFRCT: outcome and resource impacts study , 2015, European heart journal.

[16]  J. Tobin,et al.  Coronary Computed Tomography Versus Radionuclide Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Chest Pain Patients Admitted to Telemetry: A Randomized, Controlled Trial , 2015 .

[17]  J. Min,et al.  Finding the Gatekeeper to the Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory: Coronary CT Angiography or Stress Testing? , 2015, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  Scot-Heart Investigators,et al.  CT coronary angiography in patients with suspected angina due to coronary heart disease (SCOT-HEART): an open-label, parallel-group, multicentre trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[19]  E. Picano,et al.  Dual imaging stress echocardiography versus computed tomography coronary angiography for risk stratification of patients with chest pain of unknown origin , 2015, Cardiovascular Ultrasound.

[20]  S. Petersen,et al.  The Optimal Imaging Strategy for Patients With Stable Chest Pain , 2015, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[21]  P. Donnelly,et al.  A comparison of cardiac computerized tomography and exercise stress electrocardiogram test for the investigation of stable chest pain: the clinical results of the CAPP randomized prospective trial. , 2015, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[22]  A. Einstein,et al.  Radiation Dose and Prognosis of Ultra-Low-Dose Stress-First Myocardial Perfusion SPECT in Patients with Chest Pain Using a High-Efficiency Camera , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[23]  E. Yow,et al.  A selection of recent, original research papers , 2015, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[24]  M. Desai,et al.  Noninvasive testing strategies in symptomatic, intermediate-risk CAD patients: a perspective on the "PROMISE" trial and its potential implementation in clinical practice. , 2015, Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy.

[25]  Tessa S Cook,et al.  Cardiac CT angiography in the emergency department. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[26]  J. Fleg,et al.  High-risk plaque detected on coronary CT angiography predicts acute coronary syndromes independent of significant stenosis in acute chest pain: results from the ROMICAT-II trial. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  Yong-Jin Kim,et al.  Diagnostic yield of coronary angiography in patients with acute chest pain: role of noninvasive test. , 2014, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[28]  T. Chua,et al.  Stress myocardial perfusion imaging for the evaluation and triage of chest pain in the emergency department: A randomized controlled trial , 2013, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[29]  Christopher K. Zarins,et al.  Computed Fractional Flow Reserve (FFTCT) Derived from Coronary CT Angiography , 2013, Journal of Cardiovascular Translational Research.

[30]  G. Raff,et al.  Associations between routine coronary computed tomographic angiography and reduced unnecessary hospital admissions, length of stay, recidivism rates, and invasive coronary angiography in the emergency department triage of chest pain. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[31]  D. Berman,et al.  Optimized prognostic score for coronary computed tomographic angiography: results from the CONFIRM registry (COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN For Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational Multicenter Registry). , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[32]  Liang Zhong,et al.  Area stenosis associated with non-invasive fractional flow reserve obtained from coronary CT images , 2013, 2013 35th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[33]  B. Williams,et al.  Prognostic value of adenosine cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients presenting with chest pain. , 2013, The American journal of cardiology.

[34]  Charles A. Taylor,et al.  Computational fluid dynamics applied to cardiac computed tomography for noninvasive quantification of fractional flow reserve: scientific basis. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[35]  P. Donnelly,et al.  A comparison of Diamond Forrester and coronary calcium scores as gatekeepers for investigations of stable chest pain , 2013, The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

[36]  G. Burke,et al.  Reduction in observation unit length of stay with coronary computed tomography angiography depends on time of emergency department presentation. , 2013, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[37]  I. Benseñor,et al.  Calcium score to evaluate chest pain in the emergency room. , 2013, Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia.

[38]  Michael J Pencina,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. , 2012, JAMA.

[39]  Hyuk-Jae Chang,et al.  Meaning of zero coronary calcium score in symptomatic patients referred for coronary computed tomographic angiography. , 2012, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[40]  M. Blaha,et al.  Utility of coronary artery calcium scoring in the evaluation of patients with chest pain. , 2012, Critical pathways in cardiology.

[41]  K. Nasir,et al.  Role of nonenhanced multidetector CT coronary artery calcium testing in asymptomatic and symptomatic individuals. , 2012, Radiology.

[42]  R. Cury,et al.  Comparison of traditional cardiovascular risk models and coronary atherosclerotic plaque as detected by computed tomography for prediction of acute coronary syndrome in patients with acute chest pain. , 2012, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[43]  J. Fleg,et al.  Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[44]  Mario J. Garcia,et al.  Coronary CT and the Coronary Calcium Score, the Future of ED Risk Stratification? , 2012, Current cardiology reviews.

[45]  S. Plein,et al.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial , 2012, The Lancet.

[46]  R. Blankstein,et al.  Comparison of Exercise Treadmill Testing With Cardiac CT Angiography Among Patients Presenting To The Emergency Room With Chest Pain: ROMICAT Study , 2012 .

[47]  J. Núñez,et al.  Prognostic implications of dipyridamole cardiac MR imaging: a prospective multicenter registry. , 2012, Radiology.

[48]  A. Dunning,et al.  Diagnosis of ischemia-causing coronary stenoses by noninvasive fractional flow reserve computed from coronary computed tomographic angiograms. Results from the prospective multicenter DISCOVER-FLOW (Diagnosis of Ischemia-Causing Stenoses Obtained Via Noninvasive Fractional Flow Reserve) study. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[49]  T. Brady,et al.  Prognostic value of CT angiography for major adverse cardiac events in patients with acute chest pain from the emergency department: 2-year outcomes of the ROMICAT trial. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[50]  T. Villines,et al.  Calcium scoring and chest pain: is it dead on arrival? , 2011, Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography.

[51]  James K Min,et al.  Estimated radiation dose reduction using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction in coronary CT angiography: the ERASIR study. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[52]  Vasken Dilsizian,et al.  Cardiac PET imaging for the detection and monitoring of coronary artery disease and microvascular health. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[53]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Coronary computed tomography angiography with a consistent dose below 1 mSv using prospectively electrocardiogram-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition. , 2010, European heart journal.

[54]  C. McCollough,et al.  Radiation dose and safety in cardiac computed tomography. , 2009, Cardiology clinics.

[55]  S. Wildermuth,et al.  Dual-source CT in step-and-shoot mode: noninvasive coronary angiography with low radiation dose. , 2008, Radiology.

[56]  Jiang Hsieh,et al.  Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. , 2008, Radiology.

[57]  Fuminari Tatsugami,et al.  Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. , 2007, European heart journal.

[58]  R. Redberg,et al.  The prognostic value of normal exercise myocardial perfusion imaging and exercise echocardiography: a meta-analysis. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[59]  Keiichiro Yoshinaga,et al.  What is the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography? , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[60]  N. Geller,et al.  Prognosis of negative adenosine stress magnetic resonance in patients presenting to an emergency department with chest pain. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[61]  E. Fleck,et al.  Comparison of Dobutamine Stress Magnetic Resonance, Adenosine Stress Magnetic Resonance, and Adenosine Stress Magnetic Resonance Perfusion , 2004, Circulation.

[62]  K. Dharmashankar,et al.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging in visualizing coronary arteries. , 2004, Clinical medicine & research.

[63]  F. Harrell,et al.  Incremental value of cardiac imaging in patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain and without ST-segment elevation: a multicenter study. , 2003, American heart journal.

[64]  W. Hundley,et al.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Determination of Cardiac Prognosis , 2002, Circulation.

[65]  René M. Botnar,et al.  Coronary magnetic resonance angiography for the detection of coronary stenoses. , 2001, The New England journal of medicine.

[66]  E. Monico,et al.  Selective use of single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging in a chest pain center. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.

[67]  K. Yokoyama,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of coronary stenosis by coronary magnetic resonance angiography , 2000, Heart and Vessels.