Design Rule Hierarchies and Parallelism in Software Development Tasks
暂无分享,去创建一个
Yuanfang Cai | Georgi Simeonov | Giuseppe Valetto | Sunny Wong | Kanwarpreet Sethi | Yuanfang Cai | G. Valetto | Sunny Wong | G. Simeonov | Kanwarpreet Sethi
[1] Yuanfang Cai,et al. Modularity Analysis of Logical Design Models , 2006, 21st IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE'06).
[2] Yuanfang Cai,et al. Simon: modeling and analysis of design space structures , 2005, ASE '05.
[3] Kun Wang,et al. Maintaining Life Perspectives During the Refinement of UML Class Structures , 2005, FASE.
[4] Kim B. Clark,et al. The Option Value of Modularity in Design: An Example From Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .
[5] Yuanfang Cai,et al. Predicting change impact from logical models , 2009, 2009 IEEE International Conference on Software Maintenance.
[6] Vineet Sinha,et al. Using dependency models to manage complex software architecture , 2005, OOPSLA '05.
[7] Edsger W. Dijkstra,et al. The structure of the “THE”-multiprogramming system , 1968, CACM.
[8] 青島 矢一,et al. 書評 カーリス Y. ボールドウィン/キム B. クラーク著 安藤晴彦訳『デザイン・ルール:モジュール化パワー』 Carliss Y. Baldwin & Kim B. Clark/Design Rules, Vol. 1: The Power of Modularity , 2005 .
[9] David F. Redmiles,et al. Supporting collaborative software development through the visualization of socio-technical dependencies , 2007, GROUP.
[10] Paul Clements,et al. Software architecture in practice , 1999, SEI series in software engineering.
[11] Cláudio Sant'Anna,et al. From retrospect to prospect: Assessing modularity and stability from software architecture , 2009, 2009 Joint Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture & European Conference on Software Architecture.
[12] Kim B. Clark,et al. The power of modularity , 2000 .
[13] Li-Te Cheng,et al. How a good software practice thwarts collaboration: the multiple roles of APIs in software development , 2004, SIGSOFT '04/FSE-12.
[14] Audris Mockus,et al. Formulation and preliminary test of an empirical theory of coordination in software engineering , 2003, ESEC/FSE-11.
[15] James D. Herbsleb,et al. Socio-technical congruence: a framework for assessing the impact of technical and work dependencies on software development productivity , 2008, ESEM '08.
[16] Lionel C. Briand,et al. An Investigation of Graph-Based Class Integration Test Order Strategies , 2003, IEEE Trans. Software Eng..
[17] James D. Herbsleb,et al. Identification of coordination requirements: implications for the Design of collaboration and awareness tools , 2006, CSCW '06.
[18] Yuanfang Cai,et al. Modularity in design: formal modeling and automated analysis , 2006 .
[19] Pankaj Jalote,et al. Assigning tasks in a 24-hour software development model , 2004, 11th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference.
[20] D. L. Parnas,et al. On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules , 1972, Software Pioneers.
[21] Ralph Johnson,et al. design patterns elements of reusable object oriented software , 2019 .
[22] Jos van Hillegersberg,et al. Detecting Coordination Problems in Collaborative Software Development Environments , 2008, Inf. Syst. Manag..
[23] M. E. Conway. HOW DO COMMITTEES INVENT , 1967 .
[24] William G. Griswold,et al. The structure and value of modularity in software design , 2001, ESEC/FSE-9.
[25] David Lorge Parnas,et al. Review of David L. Parnas' "Designing Software for Ease of Extension and Contraction" , 2004 .