Novel sounds as a psychophysiological measure of listening effort in older listeners with and without hearing loss
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] D. Ruchkin,et al. Toward a functional categorization of slow waves. , 1988, Psychophysiology.
[2] E. Donchin,et al. Performance of concurrent tasks: a psychophysiological analysis of the reciprocity of information-processing resources. , 1983, Science.
[3] D Friedman,et al. Age-related changes in scalp topography to novel and target stimuli. , 1993, Psychophysiology.
[4] S. Hillyard,et al. Electrical Signs of Selective Attention in the Human Brain , 1973, Science.
[5] A. Muller-Gass,et al. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity , 2006, Brain Research.
[6] David Friedman,et al. P300 and slow wave: The effects of reaction time quartile , 1984, Biological Psychology.
[7] Arthur Wingfield,et al. Hearing Loss and Perceptual Effort: Downstream Effects on Older Adults’ Memory for Speech , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.
[8] R. Knight,et al. Prefrontal deficits in attention and inhibitory control with aging. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.
[9] Carles Escera,et al. When Loading Working Memory Reduces Distraction: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence from an Auditory-Visual Distraction Paradigm , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[10] A. Zekveld,et al. Pupil Response as an Indication of Effortful Listening: The Influence of Sentence Intelligibility , 2010, Ear and hearing.
[11] Performance of normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners using a German version of the SPIN test. , 1994, Scandinavian audiology.
[12] Erin M Picou,et al. How Hearing Aids, Background Noise, and Visual Cues Influence Objective Listening Effort , 2013, Ear and hearing.
[13] Peng Yuan,et al. The effect of visuospatial attentional load on the processing of irrelevant acoustic distractors , 2006, NeuroImage.
[14] Sander Nieuwenhuis,et al. Functional significance of the emotion-related late positive potential , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[15] N. Squires,et al. Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[16] M. Tervaniemi,et al. ‘I love Rock ‘n’ Roll’—Music genre preference modulates brain responses to music , 2013, Biological Psychology.
[17] Matthew W. Miller,et al. A novel approach to the physiological measurement of mental workload. , 2011, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.
[18] E. Schröger,et al. Perceptual and cognitive task difficulty has differential effects on auditory distraction , 2007, Brain Research.
[19] M. L. Kietzman,et al. Slow wave and P300 in signal detection. , 1980, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[20] U. Erdmann,et al. Auditory probe sensitivity to mental workload changes - an event-related potential study. , 2001, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.
[21] Karen A Doherty,et al. Age-Related Changes in Listening Effort for Various Types of Masker Noises , 2013, Ear and hearing.
[22] Brendan Z. Allison,et al. Workload assessment of computer gaming using a single-stimulus event-related potential paradigm , 2008, Biological Psychology.
[23] Jean-Pierre Gagné,et al. Use of a Dual-Task Paradigm to Measure Listening Effort Utilisation d ’ un paradigme de double tâche pour mesurer l ’ attention auditive , 2010 .
[24] A. Heyman,et al. The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). Part III. Reliability of a standardized MRI evaluation of Alzheimer's disease , 1992, Neurology.
[25] Trevor J. Cox,et al. Event-related potential study to aversive auditory stimuli , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.
[26] M. Fabiani,et al. Changes in brain activity patterns in aging: the novelty oddball. , 1995, Psychophysiology.
[27] David Friedman,et al. Effect of Sound Familiarity on the Event-Related Potentials Elicited by Novel Environmental Sounds , 1998, Brain and Cognition.
[28] D. Kahneman. Attention and Effort , 1973 .
[29] J. Smurzyński,et al. Effects of Age, Age-Related Hearing Loss, and Contralateral Cafeteria Noise on the Discrimination of Small Frequency Changes: Psychoacoustic and Electrophysiological Measures , 2005, Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology.
[30] A. Wingfield,et al. Aging, hearing acuity, and the attentional costs of effortful listening. , 2009, Psychology and aging.
[31] M. Daneman,et al. How young and old adults listen to and remember speech in noise. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[32] Stephan Getzmann,et al. Understanding of spoken language under challenging listening conditions in younger and older listeners: A combined behavioral and electrophysiological study , 2011, Brain Research.
[33] W Ritter,et al. A Review of Event‐Related Potential Components Discovered in the Context of Studying P3 a , 1992, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
[34] C. Peota. Novel approach. , 2011, Minnesota medicine.
[35] Stefanie E. Kuchinsky,et al. Pupil size varies with word listening and response selection difficulty in older adults with hearing loss. , 2013, Psychophysiology.
[36] J. Polich,et al. Stimulus context determines P3a and P3b. , 1998, Psychophysiology.
[37] Terence W. Picton,et al. Event-related potentials recorded during the discrimination of improbable stimuli , 1983, Biological Psychology.
[38] G. Hajcak,et al. Event-Related Potentials, Emotion, and Emotion Regulation: An Integrative Review , 2010, Developmental neuropsychology.
[39] Jean-Pierre Gagné,et al. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing speech in noise. , 2011, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[40] Christopher J. Plack,et al. Listening effort at signal-to-noise ratios that are typical of the school classroom , 2010, International journal of audiology.
[41] G. V. Simpson,et al. ERP amplitude and scalp distribution to target and novel events: effects of temporal order in young, middle-aged and older adults. , 1994, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[42] David Friedman,et al. The old switcheroo: when target environmental sounds elicit a novelty P3 , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[43] F L Wightman,et al. Resolution of front-back ambiguity in spatial hearing by listener and source movement. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[44] Wouter De Baene,et al. Cognitive vs. affective listening modes and judgments of music – An ERP study , 2010, Biological Psychology.
[45] E. Donchin,et al. P300 and tracking difficulty: evidence for multiple resources in dual-task performance. , 1980, Psychophysiology.
[46] A. Monsch,et al. The cerad neuropsychological assessment battery (Cerad-NAB)—A minimal data set as a common tool for German-speaking Europe , 2000, Neurobiology of Aging.
[47] T Fernández,et al. Primary task demands modulate P3a amplitude. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[48] B. Hornsby. The Effects of Hearing Aid Use on Listening Effort and Mental Fatigue Associated With Sustained Speech Processing Demands , 2013, Ear and hearing.
[49] D. Friedman,et al. The novelty P3: an event-related brain potential (ERP) sign of the brain's evaluation of novelty , 2001, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.
[50] N. Lavie. Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[51] Boaz M Ben-David,et al. Effects of aging and noise on real-time spoken word recognition: evidence from eye movements. , 2011, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[52] M. Fabiani,et al. Naming norms for brief environmental sounds: effects of age and dementia. , 1996, Psychophysiology.
[53] T. Jacobsen,et al. Aesthetic judgments of music in experts and laypersons--an ERP study. , 2010, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.
[54] Carryl L. Baldwin,et al. Impact of sensory acuity on auditory working memory span in young and older adults. , 2011, Psychology and aging.
[55] C D Wickens,et al. The Event‐Related Potential as an Index of the Processing Demands of a Complex Target Acquisition Task a , 1984, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
[56] Stefan Berti,et al. Examining task-dependencies of different attentional processes as reflected in the P3a and reorienting negativity components of the human event-related brain potential , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.
[57] Carol L Mackersie,et al. Subjective and psychophysiological indexes of listening effort in a competing-talker task. , 2011, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[58] B S Kopell,et al. Long-latency evoked potentials and reaction time. , 1978, Psychophysiology.
[59] P. Reuter-Lorenz. New visions of the aging mind and brain , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[60] W. Ritter,et al. Development of auditory selective attention: event-related potential measures of channel selection and target detection. , 2007, Psychophysiology.
[61] N. Butters,et al. The Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease (CERAD). Part V. A normative study of the neuropsychological battery , 1994, Neurology.
[62] Jiang Qiu,et al. The electrophysiological effect of working memory load on involuntary attention in an auditory–visual distraction paradigm: an ERP study , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.
[63] R. Mohs,et al. Consortium to establish a registry for Alzheimer's disease (CERAD) clinical and neuropsychological assessment of Alzheimer's disease. , 2002, Psychopharmacology bulletin.
[64] Perrine Ruby,et al. What is the specificity of the response to the own first-name when presented as a novel in a passive oddball paradigm? An ERP study , 2012, Brain Research.
[65] John Polich,et al. P3a from auditory white noise stimuli , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[66] A. Wingfield,et al. Language and the aging brain: patterns of neural compensation revealed by functional brain imaging. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.
[67] A. Zekveld,et al. Cognitive Load During Speech Perception in Noise: The Influence of Age, Hearing Loss, and Cognition on the Pupil Response , 2011, Ear and hearing.
[68] Darryl G. Humphrey,et al. Assessment of mental workload with task-irrelevant auditory probes , 1995, Biological Psychology.
[69] Erich Schröger,et al. Working memory controls involuntary attention switching: evidence from an auditory distraction paradigm , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.
[70] D. Filion,et al. Aging, selective attention, and inhibitory processes: a psychophysiological approach. , 1992, Psychology and Aging.
[71] M. Rudner,et al. Testing Listening Effort for Speech Comprehension Using the Individuals’ Cognitive Spare Capacity , 2011, Audiology research.
[72] Elena G. Patsenko,et al. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Pupillometry Reveals Processing Load during Spoken Language Comprehension , 2022 .
[73] Jean-Pierre Gagné,et al. Evaluating the effort expended to understand speech in noise using a dual-task paradigm: the effects of providing visual speech cues. , 2010, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[74] Sridhar Kalluri,et al. Objective measures of listening effort: effects of background noise and noise reduction. , 2009, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.