Design of a therapeutic robotic companion for relational, affective touch

Much research has shown the positive health benefits of companion animals. Unfortunately these animals are not always available to patients due to allergies, risk of disease, or other reasons. Recently, this application domain has attracted attention of robotics researchers. The Huggable is a new type of robotic companion capable of active relational and affective touch-based interactions with a person. It features a high number of somatic sensors (electric field, temperature, and force) over the entire surface of the robot, underneath a soft silicons skin and fur fabric covering. This paper describes the design and early results in recognizing affective content of touch for this robot.

[1]  T. Tamura,et al.  Is an entertainment robot useful in the care of elderly people with severe dementia? , 2004, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[2]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  A "somatic alphabet" approach to "sensitive skin" , 2004, IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2004. Proceedings. ICRA '04. 2004.

[3]  Giovanni Ballarini,et al.  Pet therapy. Animals in human therapy. , 2003, Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis.

[4]  J. Tomaka,et al.  Presence of human friends and pet dogs as moderators of autonomic responses to stress in women. , 1991, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[5]  Walter Daniel Stiehl.  Sensitive skins and somatic processing for affective and sociable robots based upon a somatic alphabet approach , 2005 .

[6]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Voice coil actuators for human-robot interaction , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[7]  Gail F. Melson,et al.  Why the Wild Things Are: Animals in the Lives of Children , 2001 .

[8]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Affective Touch for Robotic Companions , 2005, ACII.

[9]  Stacy J. Morris,et al.  A shoe-integrated sensor system for wireless gait analysis and real-time therapeutic feedback , 2004 .

[10]  Alexander Libin,et al.  Person-robot interactions from the robopsychologists' point of view: the robotic psychology and robotherapy approach , 2004, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[11]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Interactive robot theatre , 2003, CACM.

[12]  T. Shibata,et al.  Effects of robot assisted activity for elderly people at day service center and analysis of its factors , 2002, Proceedings of the 4th World Congress on Intelligent Control and Automation (Cat. No.02EX527).

[13]  V. Lumelsky,et al.  Sensitive skin , 2000, IEEE Sensors Journal.

[14]  D. Muijs,et al.  4th Edition , 2006 .

[15]  Fumio Hara,et al.  State-of-the art in component technology for an animated face robot-its component technology development for interactive communication with humans , 1996, Adv. Robotics.

[16]  J. Odendaal.  Animal-assisted therapy - magic or medicine? , 2000, Journal of psychosomatic research.

[17]  Cynthia Breazeal,et al.  Applying a "somatic alphabet" approach to inferring orientation, motion, and direction in clusters of force sensing resistors , 2004, 2004 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37566).

[18]  Glyn M. Collis,et al.  A theoretical basis for health benefits of pet ownership: Attachment versus psychological support. , 1998 .