Contingency View on Technological Differentiation and Firm Performance: Evidence in an Economic Downturn

Although the importance of strategy for firm performance has been studied, little evidence has been offered regarding this linkage in hostile environments characterized by a lack of exploitable market opportunity and fiercer competition. This study aims to examine the viability of strategic postures of technological differentiation in such a setting using data from 1,054 samples across 32 industries in 30 countries during 20012002, when global economies suffered a downturn. The empirical results show that differentiation-oriented firms underperformed efficiency-oriented ones during this period. However, in the face of deteriorating market conditions, a strategic orientation toward technological differentiation, in concert with an internal commitment to R&D investment or external munificence toward technological opportunity, yields better performance. Finally, this study finds that firms with tight coupling between differentiation and efficiency outmaneuver those with a pure strategy or no strategy at the time of an economic downturn.

[1]  Stephen Tallman,et al.  PRODUCT AND INTERNATIONAL DIVERSIFICATION AMONG JAPANESE MULTINATIONAL FIRMS , 2000 .

[2]  D. Hambrick.  High Profit Strategies in Mature Capital Goods Industries: A Contingency Approach , 1983 .

[3]  Danny Miller,et al.  SOURCES AND CONSEQUENCES OF COMPETITIVE INERTIA: A STUDY OF THE U.S. AIRLINE INDUSTRY. , 1994 .

[4]  Roderick E. White.  Generic business strategies, organizational context and performance: An empirical investigation , 1986 .

[5]  D Miller,et al.  The generic strategy trap. , 1992, The Journal of business strategy.

[6]  M. Porter.  Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance , 1985 .

[7]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Exploring the black box: Telecommunications: complex, uncertain, and path dependent , 1994 .

[8]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Patterns of Industrial Innovation , 1978 .

[9]  V. Narayanan,et al.  Shareholder Value Creation During R&D Innovation And Commercialization Stages , 1995 .

[10]  Per Joakim Agrell,et al.  A coherent methodology for productivity analysis employing integrated partial efficiency , 1996 .

[11]  P. Ghemawat.  Commitment: The Dynamic of Strategy , 1991 .

[12]  Noel Capon,et al.  Toward an Integrative Explanation of Corporate Financial Performance , 1996 .

[13]  William J. Abernathy,et al.  Managing our way to economic decline , 2007 .

[14]  R. Grant.  Strategic planning in a turbulent environment: evidence from the oil majors , 2003 .

[15]  M. Feldman,et al.  R&D spillovers and the ge-ography of innovation and production , 1996 .

[16]  Varun Grover,et al.  Recognizing the politics of MIS , 1988, Inf. Manag..

[17]  John E. Prescott,et al.  Determinants of Top Management Compensation: Explaining the Impact of Economic, Behavioral, and Strategic Constructs and the Moderating Effects of Industry , 1990 .

[18]  R. Bettis.  Performance differences in related and unrelated diversified firms , 1981 .

[19]  D. Rigby.  Moving upward in a downturn. , 2001, Harvard business review.

[20]  Ram Subramanian,et al.  Revisiting the Pure versus Hybrid Dilemma , 2001 .

[21]  Yiannis E. Spanos,et al.  Strategy and industry effects on profitability: evidence from Greece , 2004 .

[22]  William S. Schulze,et al.  A social capital model of high growth ventures , 2003 .

[23]  Danny Miller,et al.  Porter's (1980) Generic Strategies and Performance: An Empirical Examination with American Data , 1986 .

[24]  Rajiv Sabherwal,et al.  Determinants of Commitment to Information Systems Development: A Longitudinal Investigation , 1996, MIS Q..

[25]  A. E. Pearson,et al.  Tough-minded ways to get innovative , 2002 .

[26]  Rita Gunther McGrath,et al.  Real options reasoning and a new look at the R&D investment strategies of pharmaceutical firms , 2004 .

[27]  G. Day.  Strategic Market Planning: The Pursuit of Competitive Advantage , 1984 .

[28]  J. Prescott.  Environments as Moderators of the Relationship Between Strategy and Performance , 1986 .

[29]  L. Kim,et al.  Environment, Generic Strategies, and Performance in a Rapidly Developing Country: A Taxonomic Approach , 1988 .

[30]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[31]  Kressel,et al.  Competing for the Future , 2007 .

[32]  John Roberts,et al.  Uncertain Imitability : An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency under Competition , 2007 .

[33]  Marilyn M. Helms,et al.  Generic Strategies and Business Performance: an Empirical Study of the Screw Machine Products Industry , 1991 .

[34]  L. J. Bourgeois,et al.  Strategy and Environment: A Conceptual Integration , 1980 .

[35]  Stephen M. Shortell,et al.  Health Care Management : Organization Design and Behavior , 1997 .

[36]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Reengineering the Corporation: A Manifesto for Business Revolution , 1995 .

[37]  David J. Miller,et al.  Relating Porter's Business Strategies to Environment and Structure: Analysis and Performance Implications , 1988 .

[38]  K. Kumar,et al.  Pure versus hybrid: performance implications of Porter's generic strategies. , 1997, Health care management review.

[39]  G. Bailey,et al.  Is there life after downsizing? , 1988, The Journal of business strategy.

[40]  Gongming Qian,et al.  Profitability of small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises in high‐tech industries: the case of the biotechnology industry , 2003 .

[41]  Michael A. Hitt,et al.  Institutional Ownership Differences and International Diversification: The Effects of Boards of Directors and Technological Opportunity , 2003 .

[42]  Harsha Desai,et al.  Turnaround Strategies for Small Firms , 1991 .

[43]  David J. Miller,et al.  Configurations of strategy and structure: Towards a synthesis , 1986 .

[44]  S. Swailes.  Goals, Creativity and Achievement: Commitment in Contemporary Organizations , 2000 .

[45]  M. Porter.  Towards a dynamic theory of strategy , 1991 .

[46]  C. K. Prahalad,et al.  Strategic Intent , 2007 .

[47]  D. Slevin,et al.  Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments , 1989 .

[48]  J. Pearce.  The relationship of internal versus external orientations to financial measures of strategic performance , 1983 .

[49]  Praveen R. Nayyar,et al.  On the Measurement of Competitive Strategy: Evidence From a Large Multiproduct U.S. Firm , 1993 .

[50]  H. Louri,et al.  Entry in Greek Manufacturing Industry: Athens vs the Rest of Greece , 1994 .

[51]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[52]  Zi-Lin He,et al.  Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[53]  C. Hardy.  Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems , 1983 .

[54]  Deepak K. Datta,et al.  New CEO Openness to Change and Strategic Persistence: The Moderating Role of Industry Characteristics , 2003 .

[55]  Computer Staff,et al.  The Machine That Changed the World , 1992 .

[56]  B. Chakravarthy,et al.  The persistence of knowledge‐based advantage: an empirical test for product performance and technological knowledge , 2002 .

[57]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Porter's (1980) Generic Strategies as Determinants of Strategic Group Membership and Organizational Performance , 1984 .

[58]  A. Murray.  A Contingency View of Porter's “Generic Strategies” , 1988 .

[59]  Anurag Sharma,et al.  Diversifying Entry: Some Ex Ante Explanations for Postentry Survival and Growth , 1996 .

[60]  S. Lippman,et al.  Uncertain Imitability: An Analysis of Interfirm Differences in Efficiency under Competition , 1982 .

[61]  Hildy Teegen,et al.  Export Strategies and Performance of Firms from Emerging Economies: Evidence from Brazil, Chile, and Mexico , 2000 .

[62]  Donald O. Neubaum,et al.  Entrepreneurship in Medium-Size Companies: Exploring the Effects of Ownership and Governance Systems , 2000 .