Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case

Previous research suggests that knowledge diffusion occurs more quickly within Toyota’s production network than in competing automaker networks. In this paper we examine the ‘black box’ of knowledge sharing within Toyota’s network and demonstrate that Toyota’s ability to effectively create and manage network-level knowledge-sharing processes at least partially explains the relative productivity advantages enjoyed by Toyota and its suppliers. We provide evidence that suppliers do learn more quickly after participating in Toyota’s knowledge-sharing network. Toyota’s network has solved three fundamental dilemmas with regard to knowledge sharing by devising methods to (1) motivate members to participate and openly share valuable knowledge (while preventing undesirable spillovers to competitors), (2) prevent free riders, and (3) reduce the costs associated with finding and accessing different types of valuable knowledge. Toyota has done this by creating a strong network identity with rules for participation and entry into the network. Most importantly, production knowledge is viewed as the property of the network. Toyota’s highly interconnected, strong tie network has established a variety of institutionalized routines that facilitate multidirectional knowledge flows among suppliers. Our study suggests that the notion of a dynamic learning capability that creates competitive advantage needs to be extended beyond firm boundaries. Indeed, if the network can create a strong identity and coordinating rules, then it will be superior to a firm as an organizational form at creating and recombining knowledge due to the diversity of knowledge that resides within a network. Copyright © 2000 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  R. Coase The Nature of the Firm , 1937 .

[2]  G. Ryle,et al.  心的概念 = The concept of mind , 1962 .

[3]  A. Gouldner THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[4]  Willard F. Mueller,et al.  The Origins of the Basic Inventions Underlying Du Pont's Major Product and Process Innovations, 1920 to 1950 , 1962 .

[5]  A. Strauss,et al.  The Discovery of Grounded Theory , 1967 .

[6]  L. Telser A Theory of Self-enforcing Agreements , 1980 .

[7]  William G. Ouchi,et al.  Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans. , 1980 .

[8]  D. Campbell,et al.  Nonreactive Measures in the Social Sciences , 1981 .

[9]  Gavin J. Wright An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1982 .

[10]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[11]  R. Dore Goodwill and the Spirit of Market Capitalism , 1983 .

[12]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Resource-Based View of the Firm , 1984 .

[13]  Mark S. Granovetter Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness , 1985, American Journal of Sociology.

[14]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[15]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  The Japanese Automobile Industry: Technology and Management at Nissan and Toyota , 1986 .

[16]  Paolo Leon The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1986, The Antitrust Bulletin.

[17]  W. Dugger The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[18]  青木 昌彦 Information, incentives, and bargaining in the Japanese economy , 1988 .

[19]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[20]  M. Aoki Information, Incentives and Bargaining in the Japanese Economy: A Microtheory of the Japanese Economy , 1988 .

[21]  Information, incentives, and bargaining in the Japanese economy: Bargaining game at the J-firm , 1988 .

[22]  Barbara Gray,et al.  Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems , 1989 .

[23]  Banri Asanuma Manufacturer-supplier relationships in Japan and the concept of relation-specific skill , 1989 .

[24]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[25]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  NETWORK DATA AND MEASUREMENT , 1990 .

[26]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[27]  Joseph L. Badaracco,et al.  The knowledge link , 1990 .

[28]  A. Strauss Basics Of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[29]  M. Sako The Role of «Trust» in Japanese buyer-supplier relationships , 1991 .

[30]  B. Gray,et al.  Toward a Comprehensive Theory of Collaboration , 1991 .

[31]  G. Hamel Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[32]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[33]  P. Ring,et al.  Structuring cooperative relationships between organizations , 1992 .

[34]  J. Lincoln,et al.  Keiretsu Networks in the Japanese Economy: A Dyad Analysis of Intercorporate Ties , 1992 .

[35]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[36]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[37]  Organizations , 1992, Restoration & Management Notes.

[38]  Todd Sandler,et al.  Collective Action: Theory and Applications , 1992 .

[39]  Computer Staff,et al.  The Machine That Changed the World , 1992 .

[40]  E. Zajac,et al.  FROM TRANSACTION COST TO TRANSACTIONAL VALUE ANALYSIS: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE STUDY OF INTERORGANIZATIONAL STRATEGIES* , 1993 .

[41]  I. Nonaka A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[42]  Benjamin Gomes-Casseres Group versus group: How alliance networks compete , 1994 .

[43]  J. Barney,et al.  Trustworthiness as a Source of Competitive Advantage , 1994 .

[44]  Robert A. Burgelman Fading Memories: A Process Theory of Strategic Business Exit in Dynamic Environments , 1994 .

[45]  C. Hill National Institutional Structures, Transaction Cost Economizing and Competitive Advantage: The Case of Japan , 1995 .

[46]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange , 1995 .

[47]  R. Gulati Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implications of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances , 1995 .

[48]  Nanette S. Levinson,et al.  Cross-national alliances and interorganizational learning , 1995 .

[49]  Judy C. Shetler,et al.  Building Cooperation in a Competitive Industry: Sematech and the Semiconductor Industry , 1995 .

[50]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  Inter-Organizational Collaboration in the Biotechnology Industry , 1996 .

[51]  D. Mowery,et al.  Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer , 1996 .

[52]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[53]  Kevin Quigley Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity , 1996 .

[54]  Jeffrey H. Dyer Specialized supplier networks as a source of competitive advantage : Evidence from the auto industry , 1996 .

[55]  K. R. Conner,et al.  A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism , 1996 .

[56]  J. Spender Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm , 1996 .

[57]  J. Logan THE CRITICAL MASS , 1996 .

[58]  A. Saxenian Regional Advantage , 1996 .

[59]  W. Powell,et al.  Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology. , 1996 .

[60]  J. H. Dyer Effective interim collaboration: how firms minimize transaction costs and maximise transaction value , 1997 .

[61]  M. Lieberman,et al.  Inventory reduction and productivity growth: A comparison of Japanese and us automotive sectors , 1997 .

[62]  B. Uzzi,et al.  Social Structure and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness , 1997 .

[63]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[64]  John Paul Macduffie,et al.  Creating Lean Suppliers: Diffusing Lean Production through the Supply Chain , 1997 .

[65]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[66]  A. Zaheer,et al.  Does Trust Matter? Exploring the Effectsof Interorganizational and Interpersonaltrust on Performance , 1998 .

[67]  Jeffrey H. Dyer EFFECTIVE INTERFIRM COLLABORATION : HOW FIRMS MINIMIZE TRANSACTION COSTS AND MAXIMIZE TRANSACTION VALUE r , 1998 .

[68]  Gianni Lorenzoni,et al.  The leveraging of interfirm relationships as a distinctive organizational capability: a longitudinal study , 1999 .

[69]  B. Kogut The network as knowledge : Generative rules and the emergence of structure , 2000 .

[70]  Dean M. Behrens,et al.  Redundant governance structures: an analysis of structural and relational embeddedness in the steel and semiconductor industries , 2000 .

[71]  T. Khanna,et al.  Do Firms Learn to Create Value? The Case of Alliances , 2000 .

[72]  Harbir Singh,et al.  Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital , 2000 .

[73]  Allan Afuah How much do your co-opetitors' capabilities matter in the face of technological change? , 2000 .

[74]  G. Ahuja The duality of collaboration : Inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages , 2000 .

[75]  J. Ruiz Moreno [Organizational learning]. , 2001, Revista de enfermeria.