The interplay between smart manufacturing technologies and work organization

The purpose of this paper is to provide evidence on how smart manufacturing (SM) affects work organization at both micro-level – i.e. work design, described in terms of operator job breadth and autonomy, cognitive demand and social interaction – and at macro-level – i.e. organizational structure, described in terms of centralization of decision making and number of hierarchical levels in the plant.,The paper reports on a multiple-case study of 19 companies implementing SM.,Results present four main configurations differing in terms of technological complexity, and micro and macro work organization.,The paper contributes to the academic debate about the interplay between technology and work organization in the context of SM, specifically the authors find that the level of technology complexity relates to different characteristics of micro and macro work organization in the plant.,Findings offer valuable insights for practice, with implications for the design of operator jobs, skills and plant organizational structure, in light of the challenges generated by the implementation of SM technology. Guidelines on how policymakers can foster the implementation of SM technology to enhance social sustainability are proposed.,This study advances a novel focus in studying SM, i.e. work organization implications of this new manufacturing paradigm instead of its mere technological implications.

[1]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[2]  D. Coghlan,et al.  Collaborative Management Research as a Modality of Action Research , 2016 .

[3]  Kweku-Muata Osei-Bryson,et al.  An exploration of factors that impact individual performance in an ERP environment: an analysis using multiple analytical techniques , 2006, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Gianluca Spina,et al.  Advanced manufacturing technologies and strategically flexible production , 2000 .

[5]  Thomas F. Edgar,et al.  Smart manufacturing, manufacturing intelligence and demand-dynamic performance , 2012, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[6]  Kevin G. Corley,et al.  Seeking Qualitative Rigor in Inductive Research , 2013 .

[7]  David Xiaosong Peng,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology Use on Plant Structure, Practices, and Performance: An Exploratory Study , 2010 .

[8]  Henry Mintzberg,et al.  Structure in 5's: A Synthesis of the Research on Organization Design , 1980, Management Science.

[9]  Jay Lee,et al.  A Cyber-Physical Systems architecture for Industry 4.0-based manufacturing systems , 2015 .

[10]  N. Hoffart Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[11]  Michael A. Osborne,et al.  The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? , 2017 .

[12]  Surajit Bag,et al.  Industry 4.0 implementation for multinationals , 2018, Process Safety and Environmental Protection.

[13]  Lucas Santos Dalenogare,et al.  Industry 4.0 technologies: Implementation patterns in manufacturing companies , 2019, International Journal of Production Economics.

[14]  Sanjay Jain,et al.  Manufacturing data analytics using a virtual factory representation , 2017, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[15]  Daniel G. Bachrach,et al.  ERP in the minds of supervisors: Joint roles of task interdependence and cultural norms , 2006 .

[16]  S. Parker,et al.  Work design influences: A synthesis of multilevel factors that affect the design of jobs , 2017 .

[17]  F. Piller,et al.  Economic implications of 3D printing: Market structure models in light of additive manufacturing revisited , 2015 .

[18]  Massimo Magni,et al.  IT knowledge integration capability and team performance: The role of team climate , 2010, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[19]  van Fm Frans Eijnatten,et al.  Sociotechnical systems : towards designing and managing sustainable organizations , 2008 .

[20]  Kulwant Singh,et al.  The Impact of Technological Complexity and Interfirm Cooperation on Business Survival , 1997 .

[21]  Christopher M. McDermott,et al.  Organizational and strategic predictors of manufacturing technology implementation success: an exploratory study , 2001 .

[22]  Torbjørn H. Netland,et al.  Implementation of Industry 4.0 Technologies: What Can We Learn from the Past? , 2017, APMS.

[23]  Ajay Das,et al.  Socio-technical perspective on manufacturing system synergies , 2007 .

[24]  Åsa Fast-Berglund,et al.  The Operator 4.0: Human Cyber-Physical Systems & Adaptive Automation Towards Human-Automation Symbiosis Work Systems , 2016, APMS.

[25]  Chris W. Clegg,et al.  Advanced manufacturing technology and work design: Towards a theoretical framework , 1990 .

[26]  Elliot Bendoly,et al.  Understanding behavioral sources of process variation following enterprise system deployment , 2008 .

[27]  Sonja Stork,et al.  Artificial Cognition in Production Systems , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[28]  T. Cheng,et al.  The unique and complementary effects of manufacturing technologies and lean practices on manufacturing operational performance , 2014 .

[29]  Andrew Kusiak,et al.  Smart manufacturing , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[30]  Ruggero Golini,et al.  The role of New Forms of Work Organization in developing sustainability strategies in operations , 2014 .

[31]  Joseph Harrington,et al.  Computer integrated manufacturing , 1973 .

[32]  Eric Trist,et al.  Organizational Choice (Rle: Organizations): Capabilities of Groups at the Coal Face Under Changing Technologies , 1963 .

[33]  Zachary M. Leffakis,et al.  HR perceptions and the provision of workforce training in an AMT environment: An empirical study , 2007 .

[34]  Antonio Padovano,et al.  Smart operators in industry 4.0: A human-centered approach to enhance operators' capabilities and competencies within the new smart factory context , 2017, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[35]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[36]  Harvey G. Shulman,et al.  Designing the User-Friendly Robot: A Case History , 1985 .

[37]  Helmuth Rose,et al.  Technik und Erfahrung: Arbeit in hochautomatisierten Systemen , 1992 .

[38]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Job Characteristics and Job Satisfaction: Understanding the Role of Enterprise Resource , 2010, MIS Q..

[39]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  Task-Technology Fit and Individual Performance , 1995, MIS Q..

[40]  K. Eisenhardt Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[41]  Marc J. Schniederjans,et al.  SOURCES OF STRESS IN AN AUTOMATED PLANT , 1995 .

[42]  Yingfeng Zhang,et al.  A comprehensive review of big data analytics throughout product lifecycle to support sustainable smart manufacturing: A framework, challenges and future research directions , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[43]  Harvey F. Kolodny,et al.  New Technology and the Emerging Organizational Paradigm , 1996 .

[44]  Päivi Heikkilä,et al.  Empowering and engaging industrial workers with Operator 4.0 solutions , 2020, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[45]  Alberto Bayo‐Moriones,et al.  Are new work practices applied together with ICT and AMT? , 2017 .

[46]  Elliot Bendoly,et al.  Resource enablement modeling: Implications for studying the diffusion of technology , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[47]  F. Chan,et al.  The link between Industry 4.0 and lean manufacturing: mapping current research and establishing a research agenda , 2018, Int. J. Prod. Res..

[48]  H. Hirsch-Kreinsen Digitization of industrial work: development paths and prospects , 2016 .

[49]  Anat Dvash,et al.  Technological coupling, job characteristics and operators' well-being as moderated by desirability of control , 2001, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[50]  Jean M. Bartunek,et al.  Academic-practitioner collaboration need not require joint or relevant research: Toward a relational scholarship of integration. , 2007 .

[51]  Christopher A. Voss,et al.  Case research in operations management , 2002 .

[52]  A. Manning,et al.  Lousy and Lovely Jobs: The Rising Polarization of Work in Britain , 2007, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[53]  Davide Luzzini,et al.  The action research cycle reloaded: Conducting action research across buyer-supplier relationships , 2016 .

[54]  Daqiang Zhang,et al.  Towards smart factory for industry 4.0: a self-organized multi-agent system with big data based feedback and coordination , 2016, Comput. Networks.

[55]  David Coghlan,et al.  Insider action research: opportunities and challenges , 2007 .