Engaging with STEM Students: Successes and Challenges in Course Design

In this chapter, we will describe the approach taken to design a new first-year core course for a multidisciplinary STEM student cohort. This cohort presented challenges in terms of size, location, interest, understanding, and existing knowledge. We drew on the lessons learned from a previous redesign project for a course that shared many of these attributes to develop a course structure and approach to address these challenges. The design of the material, supporting technology, assessment, and class activities was structured to both support student learning and engage students in the learning process through a blended classroom approach and an active learning strategy. We utilised tools within the Blackboard learning management system together with the PebblePad platform for interaction to blend course elements. We followed a formal evaluation process and identified that the module and workshop structure implemented in this design were successful in supporting student learning of complex material. We observed that the quality of student work generally improved across the teaching period. Evaluations identified issues with the use of the PebblePad platform in terms of limitations for collaborative work and restrictions for document preparation. We have found that it is difficult to consistently engage with all students, and we will expand our approach to incorporate digital responses to questions and surveys with improved ability for the students to capture their own learning locally. Potential platforms to support these activities are the university native polling tool jPoll, the PebblePad platform, and the Echo360 Active Learning platform.

[1]  Robert Fitzgerald,et al.  Closing the loop on student feedback: the case of Australian and Scottish universities , 2017 .

[2]  C. Baldwin,et al.  Growing Future Planners , 2017 .

[3]  Jamie L Conklin,et al.  Closing the Loop on Nursing Library Instruction: Using Student Performance to Improve Outcomes , 2015, Medical reference services quarterly.

[4]  S. Puntambekar,et al.  Tools for Scaffolding Students in a Complex Learning Environment: What Have We Gained and What Have We Missed? , 2005 .

[5]  J. Sweller,et al.  Natural Information Processing Systems , 2006 .

[6]  John Sweller,et al.  From Cognitive Load Theory to Collaborative Cognitive Load Theory , 2018, International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning.

[7]  Jesper Simonsen,et al.  Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design , 2012 .

[8]  Ryan T. Wright,et al.  IS 2010: Curriculum Guidelines for Undergraduate Degree Programs in Information Systems , 2010, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Alison Cook-Sather,et al.  Engaging Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching: A Guide for Faculty , 2014 .

[10]  Alison Cook-Sather,et al.  Engaging students as partners in learning and teaching (1): benefits and challenges – what do we know? , 2014 .

[11]  C. Bonwell,et al.  Active learning : creating excitement in the classroom , 1991 .

[12]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Priciples and Guidlines , 2007 .

[13]  L. Vygotsky Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes: Harvard University Press , 1978 .

[14]  D. Kolb,et al.  Learning Styles and Learning Spaces: Enhancing Experiential Learning in Higher Education , 2005 .

[15]  T. J. Kennedy,et al.  Engaging Students In STEM Education , 2014 .

[16]  Pauline Roberts,et al.  Developing reflection through an ePortfolio-based learning environment: design principles for further implementation , 2018 .

[17]  Rob Koper An Introduction to Learning Design , 2005 .

[18]  Leigh Ellen Potter,et al.  A Day in the Life: An Interactive Application to Introduce IT Students to the Workplace , 2018, SIGMIS-CPR.

[19]  Stephanie D. Teasley Constructing a Joint Problem Space: The Computer as a Tool for Sharing Knowledge , 1993 .

[20]  N. Z. Safiullin,et al.  Blended Learning: Leading Modern Educational Technologies , 2014 .

[21]  Yuping Wang,et al.  Revisiting the Blended Learning Literature: Using a Complex Adaptive Systems Framework , 2015, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[22]  Michelle K. Smith,et al.  Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.