Testing pole barriers as feasible mitigation measure to avoid bird vehicle collisions (BVC)

Abstract Numbers of bird vehicle collisions (BVCs) exceed several millions per year per country in Europe and North America. However, in contrast with the advances achieved in reducing road kills in mammals, few mitigation measures have been developed to reduce BVCs. Following this line, pole barriers have emerged as a cheap and effective measure to reduce bird mortality. We experimentally tested pole barriers in three different scenarios. First, we used trained raptors to test the effect of poles on their behaviour. We were unable to show that pole barrier was a good measure per se to prevent forest raptors crossing, but the results are promising when combining the poles with coloured flag elements. Second, we considered a corridor used for water birds to move from the feeding to the resting sites. The results showed that almost all birds (93.9%) shift the flight path to avoid poles. Only 17 birds of four different species out of 278 birds of 21 species flew throughout the poles. Therefore, the method may be suitable to reduce kills in those infrastructures affecting water birds and open area birds. Third, we attracted vultures to a feeding point where we tested the effect of a pole barrier. Overall 36% of the vultures that landed coming from the pole barrier direction and 24% of the vultures that took off using the same route flew through the pole barrier, suggesting that pole barriers are not so effective when feeding resources are conditioning the behaviour of birds. Our results show that pole barriers are effective tools to reduce BVC, mainly in open areas and close to water habitats. They also could reduce the likelihood of collision with scavengers and similar birds that are attracted by carcasses of previously killed animals.

[1]  A. Mira,et al.  How Long Do the Dead Survive on the Road? Carcass Persistence Probability and Implications for Road-Kill Monitoring Surveys , 2011, PloS one.

[2]  G. Orłowski Factors Affecting Road Mortality of the Barn Swallows Hirundo rustica in Farmland , 2005 .

[3]  Wallace P. Erickson,et al.  A summary and comparison of bird mortality from anthropogenic causes with an emphasis on collisions , 2005 .

[4]  Pedro Beja,et al.  Relative Effects of Road Risk, Habitat Suitability, and Connectivity on Wildlife Roadkills: The Case of Tawny Owls (Strix aluco) , 2013, PloS one.

[5]  D. Blumstein,et al.  The omnivore’s dilemma: Diet explains variation in vulnerability to vehicle collision mortality , 2013 .

[6]  K. Vercauteren,et al.  Fences and Deer-Damage Management: A Review of Designs and Efficacy , 2006 .

[7]  A. Ibarrondo Distribucción espacio-temporal de la avifauna en el País Vasco , 1997 .

[8]  H. Jackson A field survey to investigate why nightjars frequent roads at night , 2003 .

[9]  Anthony P. Clevenger,et al.  Highway mitigation fencing reduces wildlife-vehicle collisions , 2001 .

[10]  A. Clevenger,et al.  Effects of Paved Roads on Birds: A Literature Review and Recommendations for the Yellowstone to Yukon Ecoregion , 2009 .

[11]  A. Clevenger,et al.  Wildlife-vehicle collision mitigation: Is partial fencing the answer? An agent-based model approach , 2013 .

[12]  J. Erritzøe,et al.  Bird Casualties on European Roads — A Review , 2003 .

[13]  Stephanie A. Shwiff,et al.  An Economic Analysis of a Simple Structural Method to Reduce Road-Kills of Royal Terns at Bridges , 2003 .

[14]  J. González‐Oreja,et al.  Foraging movements of Eurasian griffon vultures (Gyps fulvus): implications for supplementary feeding management , 2012, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[15]  A. Clevenger,et al.  Effects of Road Networks on Bird Populations , 2011, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[16]  Francisco Suárez,et al.  Can we mitigate animal–vehicle accidents using predictive models? , 2004 .

[17]  A. Clevenger,et al.  Performance indices to identify attributes of highway crossing structures facilitating movement of large mammals , 2005 .

[18]  Reuven Yosef,et al.  Road-kills affect avian population quality , 2011 .

[19]  Patrick Tracy McGowen,et al.  Cost–Benefit Analyses of Mitigation Measures Aimed at Reducing Collisions with Large Ungulates in the United States and Canada: a Decision Support Tool , 2009 .

[20]  A. Clevenger,et al.  Spatial patterns and factors influencing small vertebrate fauna road-kill aggregations , 2003 .

[21]  R. Foppen,et al.  Impact of road traffic on breeding bird populations , 2006 .

[22]  P. Marra,et al.  Estimation of Bird-Vehicle Collision Mortality on U.S. Roads , 2014 .

[23]  C. Varga,et al.  Bird-protection walls: an innovative way to prevent bird strikes? , 2005 .

[24]  A. Margalida,et al.  Reduced food availability induces behavioural changes in Griffon Vulture Gyps fulvus , 2010 .

[25]  D. Croft,et al.  Assessing the impacts of roads in peri-urban reserves: Road-based fatalities and road usage by wildlife in the Royal National Park, New South Wales, Australia , 2006 .

[26]  J. Zabala,et al.  Ungulate Vehicle Collisions in a Peri-Urban Environment: Consequences of Transportation Infrastructures Planned Assuming the Absence of Ungulates , 2014, PloS one.

[27]  G. Fulton,et al.  Road ecology from a road-side assemblage of forest birds in south-western Australia , 2008 .

[28]  P. Pons Height of the road embankment affects probability of traffic collision by birds , 2000 .

[29]  C. Bishop,et al.  Estimates of Avian Mortality Attributed to Vehicle Collisions in Canada , 2013 .

[30]  Mollie E. Brooks,et al.  Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution. , 2009, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[31]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Effects of Vehicle Speed on Flight Initiation by Turkey Vultures: Implications for Bird-Vehicle Collisions , 2014, PloS one.

[32]  S. L. Lima,et al.  Animal reactions to oncoming vehicles: a conceptual review , 2015, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.