Contributions of intrinsic mutation rate and selfish selection to levels of de novo HRAS mutations in the paternal germline

Significance Harvey rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (HRAS) occupies an important place in medical history, because it was the first gene in which acquired mutations that led to activation of a normal protein were associated with cancer, making it the prototype of the now canonical oncogene mechanism. Here, we explore what happens when similar HRAS mutations occur in male germ cells, an issue of practical importance because the mutations cause a serious congenital disorder, Costello syndrome, if transmitted to offspring. We provide evidence that the mutant germ cells are positively selected, leading to an increased burden of the mutations as men age. Although there are many parallels between this germline process and classical oncogenesis, there are interesting differences of detail, which are explored in this paper. The RAS proto-oncogene Harvey rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (HRAS) encodes a small GTPase that transduces signals from cell surface receptors to intracellular effectors to control cellular behavior. Although somatic HRAS mutations have been described in many cancers, germline mutations cause Costello syndrome (CS), a congenital disorder associated with predisposition to malignancy. Based on the epidemiology of CS and the occurrence of HRAS mutations in spermatocytic seminoma, we proposed that activating HRAS mutations become enriched in sperm through a process akin to tumorigenesis, termed selfish spermatogonial selection. To test this hypothesis, we quantified the levels, in blood and sperm samples, of HRAS mutations at the p.G12 codon and compared the results to changes at the p.A11 codon, at which activating mutations do not occur. The data strongly support the role of selection in determining HRAS mutation levels in sperm, and hence the occurrence of CS, but we also found differences from the mutation pattern in tumorigenesis. First, the relative prevalence of mutations in sperm correlates weakly with their in vitro activating properties and occurrence in cancers. Second, specific tandem base substitutions (predominantly GC>TT/AA) occur in sperm but not in cancers; genomewide analysis showed that this same mutation is also overrepresented in constitutional pathogenic and polymorphic variants, suggesting a heightened vulnerability to these mutations in the germline. We developed a statistical model to show how both intrinsic mutation rate and selfish selection contribute to the mutational burden borne by the paternal germline.

[1]  Evan E Eichler,et al.  Properties and rates of germline mutations in humans. , 2013, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[2]  David T. W. Jones,et al.  Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer , 2013, Nature.

[3]  D. Cooper,et al.  Patterns and Mutational Signatures of Tandem Base Substitutions Causing Human Inherited Disease , 2013, Human mutation.

[4]  N. Arnheim,et al.  Age-dependent germline mosaicism of the most common noonan syndrome mutation shows the signature of germline selection. , 2013, American journal of human genetics.

[5]  J. Boulanger,et al.  New evidence for positive selection helps explain the paternal age effect observed in achondroplasia , 2013, Human molecular genetics.

[6]  B. Robaire,et al.  Ageing of the male germ line , 2013, Nature Reviews Urology.

[7]  Lilia M. Iakoucheva,et al.  Whole-Genome Sequencing in Autism Identifies Hot Spots for De Novo Germline Mutation , 2012, Cell.

[8]  M. Zenker,et al.  Two cases with severe lethal course of Costello syndrome associated with HRAS p.G12C and p.G12D. , 2012, European journal of medical genetics.

[9]  Kenny Q. Ye,et al.  An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes , 2012, Nature.

[10]  S. Steinberg,et al.  Rate of de novo mutations and the importance of father’s age to disease risk , 2012, Nature.

[11]  A. Wilkie,et al.  Selfish Spermatogonial Selection: Evidence from an Immunohistochemical Screen in Testes of Elderly Men , 2012, PloS one.

[12]  Soo-Mi Park,et al.  Neonatal Lethal Costello Syndrome and Unusual Dinucleotide Deletion/Insertion Mutations in HRAS Predicting p.Gly12Val , 2012, American journal of medical genetics. Part A.

[13]  A. Wilkie,et al.  Paternal age effect mutations and selfish spermatogonial selection: causes and consequences for human disease. , 2012, American journal of human genetics.

[14]  N. Arnheim,et al.  Positive Selection for New Disease Mutations in the Human Germline: Evidence from the Heritable Cancer Syndrome Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2B , 2012, PLoS genetics.

[15]  G. McVean,et al.  De novo assembly and genotyping of variants using colored de Bruijn graphs , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[16]  M. DePristo,et al.  Variation in genome-wide mutation rates within and between human families , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[17]  Matthew W. Hahn,et al.  Pervasive Multinucleotide Mutational Events in Eukaryotes , 2011, Current Biology.

[18]  Allon M. Klein,et al.  Mouse germ line stem cells undergo rapid and stochastic turnover. , 2010, Cell stem cell.

[19]  P. Shannon,et al.  Analysis of Genetic Inheritance in a Family Quartet by Whole-Genome Sequencing , 2010, Science.

[20]  G. McVean,et al.  Activating mutations in FGFR3 and HRAS reveal a shared genetic origin for congenital disorders and testicular tumors , 2009, Nature Genetics.

[21]  M. Oshimura,et al.  Genetic reconstruction of mouse spermatogonial stem cell self-renewal in vitro by Ras-cyclin D2 activation. , 2009, Cell stem cell.

[22]  Rivka L. Glaser,et al.  The Ups and Downs of Mutation Frequencies during Aging Can Account for the Apert Syndrome Paternal Age Effect , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[23]  N. Arnheim,et al.  A germ-line-selective advantage rather than an increased mutation rate can explain some unexpectedly common human disease mutations , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  N. Siva 1000 Genomes project , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[25]  E. Moreno Is cell competition relevant to cancer? , 2008, Nature Reviews Cancer.

[26]  N. Arnheim,et al.  The Molecular Anatomy of Spontaneous Germline Mutations in Human Testes , 2007, PLoS biology.

[27]  M. Ahmadian,et al.  Myopathy caused by HRAS germline mutations: implications for disturbed myogenic differentiation in the presence of constitutive HRas activation , 2007, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[28]  Claudio Carta,et al.  Diversity, parental germline origin, and phenotypic spectrum of de novo HRAS missense changes in Costello syndrome , 2007, Human mutation.

[29]  K. Gripp,et al.  Paternal bias in parental origin of HRAS mutations in Costello syndrome , 2006, Human mutation.

[30]  Yukichi Tanaka,et al.  Germline mutations in HRAS proto-oncogene cause Costello syndrome , 2005, Nature Genetics.

[31]  G. McVean,et al.  Gain-of-function amino acid substitutions drive positive selection of FGFR2 mutations in human spermatogonia , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  G. McVean,et al.  Evidence for Selective Advantage of Pathogenic FGFR2 Mutations in the Male Germ Line , 2003, Science.

[33]  Alexey S Kondrashov,et al.  Direct estimates of human per nucleotide mutation rates at 20 loci causing mendelian diseases , 2003, Human mutation.

[34]  G. Pfeifer,et al.  Oxidative DNA damage induced by copper and hydrogen peroxide promotes CG-->TT tandem mutations at methylated CpG dinucleotides in nucleotide excision repair-deficient cells. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[35]  M. Nachman,et al.  Estimate of the mutation rate per nucleotide in humans. , 2000, Genetics.

[36]  P. Sharp,et al.  Evidence for a high frequency of simultaneous double-nucleotide substitutions. , 2000, Science.

[37]  A. Moya,et al.  Contribution of Taq polymerase-induced errors to the estimation of RNA virus diversity. , 1998, The Journal of general virology.

[38]  L. Mulligan,et al.  Germline dinucleotide mutation in codon 883 of the RET proto-oncogene in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B without codon 918 mutation. , 1997, The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism.

[39]  W. Kabsch,et al.  The Ras-RasGAP complex: structural basis for GTPase activation and its loss in oncogenic Ras mutants. , 1997, Science.

[40]  A. Levinson,et al.  Biochemical characterization of polypeptides encoded by mutated human Ha-ras1 genes , 1986, Molecular and cellular biology.

[41]  C. Der,et al.  Biological and biochemical properties of human ras H genes mutated at codon 61 , 1986, Cell.

[42]  P. Seeburg,et al.  Biological properties of human c-Ha-ras1 genes mutated at codon 12 , 1984, Nature.

[43]  M. Wigler,et al.  Analysis of the transforming potential of the human H-ras gene by random mutagenesis. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  Eugenio Santos,et al.  A point mutation is responsible for the acquisition of transforming properties by the T24 human bladder carcinoma oncogene , 1982, Nature.

[45]  Cori Bargmann,et al.  Mechanism of activation of a human oncogene , 1982, Nature.