The Impact of Incentives Upon Risky Choice Experiments

Much of the evidence raising doubts about expected utility theory (EUT) comes from experiments involving hypothetical decisions. Most of the rest of the evidence comes from experiments where respondents are asked to make a large number of decisions, knowing that only one of these will provide the basis for payment. Concerns have often been expressed about the "realness" of such data, and their reliability as a basis for criticizing EUT and promoting alternative theories. The present article reviews this debate and reports new experimental results that directly address this issue.

[1]  N. Wilcox.  Lottery choice: incentives, complexity and decision time , 1993 .

[2]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk Author ( s ) : , 2007 .

[3]  Colin Camerer.  Individual Decision Making , 2020, The Handbook of Experimental Economics.

[4]  M. Allais.  Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque : critique des postulats et axiomes de l'ecole americaine , 1953 .

[5]  Glenn W. Harrison,et al.  Expected Utility Theory and the Experimentalists , 1994 .

[6]  M. Degroot,et al.  Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. , 1964, Behavioral science.

[7]  A. Hart,et al.  Experimental Verification of a Composite Indifference Map , 1951, Journal of Political Economy.

[8]  Uzi Segal,et al.  Does the Preference Reversal Phenomenon Necessarily Contradict the Independence Axiom , 1988 .

[9]  V. Smith.  Monetary Rewards and Decision Cost in Experimental Economics: An Extension , 1993 .

[10]  John H. Kagel,et al.  Testing between alternative models of choice under uncertainty: Some initial results , 1990 .

[11]  J. Kagel,et al.  Handbook of Experimental Economics , 1997 .

[12]  Edi Karni,et al.  Preference reversal and the observability of preferences by experimental methods , 1987 .

[13]  Steven M. Shugan.  The Cost Of Thinking , 1980 .

[14]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Preference Reversals and the Independence Axiom , 1986 .

[15]  John Conlisk,et al.  Three Variants on the Allais Example , 1989 .

[16]  Glenn W. Harrison,et al.  Expected utility theory and the experiments , 1994 .

[17]  Robin P. Cubitt,et al.  Dynamic Choice and the Common Ratio Effect: An Experimental Investigation , 1998 .