A human post-mortem brain model for the standardization of multi-centre MRI studies

Multi-centre MRI studies of the brain are essential for enrolling large and diverse patient cohorts, as required for the investigation of heterogeneous neurological and psychiatric diseases. However, the multi-site comparison of standard MRI data sets that are weighted with respect to tissue parameters such as the relaxation times (T1, T2) and proton density (PD) may be problematic, as signal intensities and image contrasts depend on site-specific details such as the sequences used, imaging parameters, and sensitivity profiles of the radiofrequency (RF) coils. Water or gel phantoms are frequently used for long-term and/or inter-site quality assessment. However, these phantoms hardly mimic the structure, shape, size or tissue distribution of the human brain. The goals of this study were: (1) to validate the long-term stability of a human post-mortem brain phantom, performing quantitative mapping of T1, T2, and PD, and the magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) over a period of 18months; (2) to acquire and analyse data for this phantom and the brain of a healthy control (HC) in a multi-centre study for MRI protocol standardization in four centres, while conducting a voxel-wise as well as whole brain grey (GM) and white matter (WM) tissue volume comparison. MTR, T2, and the quotient of PD in WM and GM were stable in the post-mortem brain with no significant changes. T1 was found to decrease from 267/236ms (GM/WM) to 234/216ms between 5 and 17weeks post embedment, stabilizing during an 18-month period following the first scan at about 215/190ms. The volumetric measures, based on T1-weighted MP-RAGE images obtained at all participating centres, revealed inter- and intra-centre variations in the evaluated GM and WM volumes that displayed similar trends in both the post-mortem brain as well as the HC. At a confidence level of 95%, brain regions such as the brainstem, deep GM structures as well as boundaries between GM and WM tissues were found to be less reproducible than other brain regions in all participating centres. The results demonstrate that a post-mortem brain phantom may be used as a reliable tool for multi-centre MR studies.

[1]  E. Hoffman,et al.  3-D phantom to simulate cerebral blood flow and metabolic images for PET , 1990 .

[2]  Juha I Peltonen,et al.  MRI quality assurance using the ACR phantom in a multi-unit imaging center , 2011, Acta oncologica.

[3]  Lee Friedman,et al.  Report on a multicenter fMRI quality assurance protocol , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  Hilleke E. Hulshoff Pol,et al.  Brain volumes as predictor of outcome in recent-onset schizophrenia: a multi-center MRI study , 2003, Schizophrenia Research.

[5]  L. Wald,et al.  32‐channel 3 Tesla receive‐only phased‐array head coil with soccer‐ball element geometry , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Reliability of MRI-derived measurements of human cerebral cortical thickness: The effects of field strength, scanner upgrade and manufacturer , 2006, NeuroImage.

[7]  F. Jessen,et al.  Multicentre variability of MRI-based medial temporal lobe volumetry in Alzheimer's disease , 2010, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[8]  Richard I. Kitney,et al.  Standardization of performance evaluation in MRI: 13 Years' experience of intersystem comparison , 2002 .

[9]  A. Dale,et al.  Focal thinning of the cerebral cortex in multiple sclerosis. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[10]  E M Haacke,et al.  Accurate determination of spin‐density and T1 in the presence of RF‐field inhomogeneities and flip‐angle miscalibration , 1998, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[11]  G. Bruce Pike,et al.  Standing-wave and RF penetration artifacts caused by elliptic geometry: an electrodynamic analysis of MRI , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[12]  Vasily L Yarnykh,et al.  Actual flip‐angle imaging in the pulsed steady state: A method for rapid three‐dimensional mapping of the transmitted radiofrequency field , 2007, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[13]  Arthur W. Toga,et al.  Impact of acquisition protocols and processing streams on tissue segmentation of T1 weighted MR images , 2006, NeuroImage.

[14]  John Suckling,et al.  Standardized structural magnetic resonance imaging in multicentre studies using quantitative T 1 and T 2 imaging at 1.5 T , 2008, NeuroImage.

[15]  André J. W. van der Kouwe,et al.  Reliability of MRI-derived cortical and subcortical morphometric measures: Effects of pulse sequence, voxel geometry, and parallel imaging , 2009, NeuroImage.

[16]  Jeffrey Weinreb,et al.  ACR MRI accreditation: yesterday, today, and tomorrow. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[17]  Vincent Magnotta,et al.  The Neurodevelopmental Impact of Childhood‐onset Temporal Lobe Epilepsy on Brain Structure and Function , 2002, Epilepsia.

[18]  F. Barkhof,et al.  Interscanner variation in brain MRI lesion load measurements in MS: Implications for clinical trials , 1997, Neurology.

[19]  Robert Bartha,et al.  A novel MRI‐compatible brain ventricle phantom for validation of segmentation and volumetry methods , 2012, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[20]  G. Barker,et al.  An interleaved sequence for accurate and reproducible clinical measurement of magnetization transfer ratio. , 1996, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[21]  Ralf Deichmann,et al.  A fast B1-mapping method for the correction and normalization of magnetization transfer ratio maps at 3 T , 2010, NeuroImage.

[22]  J. Mugler,et al.  Three‐dimensional magnetization‐prepared rapid gradient‐echo imaging (3D MP RAGE) , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  R. Deichmann,et al.  Correction of systematic errors in quantitative proton density mapping , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[24]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A Voxel-Based Morphometric Study of Ageing in 465 Normal Adult Human Brains , 2001, NeuroImage.

[25]  Claude Lepage,et al.  Mapping reliability in multicenter MRI: Voxel‐based morphometry and cortical thickness , 2010, Human brain mapping.

[26]  Paul S. Tofts,et al.  Quantitative MRI of the brain : measuring changes caused by disease , 2003 .

[27]  D. Louis Collins,et al.  Sensitivity of voxel-based morphometry analysis to choice of imaging protocol at 3 T , 2009, NeuroImage.

[28]  R. Deichmann,et al.  T1 mapping using spoiled FLASH‐EPI hybrid sequences and varying flip angles , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[29]  N. Makris,et al.  Decreased volume of left and total anterior insular lobule in schizophrenia , 2006, Schizophrenia Research.

[30]  B Efron,et al.  Statistical Data Analysis in the Computer Age , 1991, Science.

[31]  Gareth J. Barker,et al.  Quantitative and qualitative assessment of structural magnetic resonance imaging data in a two-center study , 2012, BMC Medical Imaging.

[32]  T. Turkington,et al.  Accuracy of registration of PET, SPECT and MR images of a brain phantom. , 1993, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[33]  M. Tovi,et al.  Measurements of T1 and T2 over Time in Formalin-Fixed Human Whole-Brain Specimens , 1992 .

[34]  Jeremy J. Flint,et al.  Postmortem interval alters the water relaxation and diffusion properties of rat nervous tissue — Implications for MRI studies of human autopsy samples , 2009, NeuroImage.

[35]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Focal cortical atrophy in multiple sclerosis: Relation to lesion load and disability , 2007, NeuroImage.

[36]  R. Lebel,et al.  Transverse relaxometry with stimulated echo compensation , 2010, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[37]  Norbert Schuff,et al.  Measurement of MRI scanner performance with the ADNI phantom. , 2009, Medical physics.

[38]  Kevin M Johnson,et al.  Simultaneous variable flip angle–actual flip angle imaging method for improved accuracy and precision of three‐dimensional T1 and B1 measurements , 2012, Magnetic resonance in medicine.