Detecting Spatial Orientation Demands during Virtual Navigation using EEG Brain Sensing

This study shows how brain sensing can offer insight to the evaluation of human spatial orientation in virtual reality (VR) and establish a role for electroencephalogram (EEG) in virtual navigation. Research suggests that the evaluation of spatial orientation in VR benefits by going beyond performance measures or questionnaires to measurements of the user’s cognitive state. While EEG has emerged as a practical brain sensing technology in cognitive research, spatial orientation tasks often rely on multiple factors (e.g., reference frame used, ability to update simulated rotation, and/or left-right confusion) which may be inaccessible to this measurement. EEG has been shown to correlate with human spatial orientation in previous research. In this paper, we use convolutional neural network (CNN), an advanced technique in machine learning, to train a detection model that can identify moments in which VR users experienced some increase in spatial orientation demands in real-time. Our results demonstrate that we can indeed use machine learning technique to detect such cognitive state of increasing spatial orientation demands in virtual reality research with 96% accurate on average. CCS Concepts • Human-centered computing → Virtual reality; • Human-centered computing → Systems and tools for interaction design

[1]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  Feasibility and pragmatics of classifying working memory load with an electroencephalograph , 2008, CHI.

[2]  Roy A. Ruddle,et al.  Movement Around Real and Virtual Cluttered Environments , 2005, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[3]  Bernhard E. Riecke Simple user-generated motion cueing can enhance self-motion perception (Vection) in virtual reality , 2006, VRST '06.

[4]  F. Bremmer,et al.  The use of optical velocities for distance discrimination and reproduction during visually simulated self motion , 1999, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  W. Klimesch,et al.  Phase synchronization between theta and upper alpha oscillations in a working memory task. , 2005, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[6]  Timothy P. McNamara,et al.  Do We Need to Walk for Effective Virtual Reality Navigation? Physical Rotations Alone May Suffice , 2010, Spatial Cognition.

[7]  Bernhard E. Riecke,et al.  Moving in a box: Improving spatial orientation in virtual reality using simulated reference frames , 2017, 2017 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI).

[8]  Mohammed Yeasin,et al.  Spectrotemporal dynamics of the EEG during working memory encoding and maintenance predicts individual behavioral capacity , 2014, The European journal of neuroscience.

[9]  Sarah S. Chance,et al.  Spatial Updating of Self-Position and Orientation During Real, Imagined, and Virtual Locomotion , 1998 .

[10]  Bruce Bridgeman,et al.  Perception & control of self-motion , 1991 .

[11]  U. Neisser Cognition and reality: principles and implications , 1976 .

[12]  J. Bhattacharya,et al.  Deconstructing Insight: EEG Correlates of Insightful Problem Solving , 2008, PloS one.

[13]  Fred G. W. C. Paas,et al.  The Efficiency of Instructional Conditions: An Approach to Combine Mental Effort and Performance Measures , 1992 .

[14]  Oswaldo Baffa,et al.  Theta Oscillations and Human Navigation: A Magnetoencephalography Study , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  C. Wickens,et al.  Dissociation of Performance and Subjective Measures of Workload , 1988 .

[16]  Behrang Keshavarz,et al.  Illusory Self-Motion in Virtual Environments , 2014, Handbook of Virtual Environments, 2nd ed..

[17]  U. Neisser Cognitive Psychology. (Book Reviews: Cognition and Reality. Principles and Implications of Cognitive Psychology) , 1976 .

[18]  Neil Burgess,et al.  Human spatial navigation: cognitive maps, sexual dimorphism, and neural substrates , 1999, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[19]  Bernhard E. Riecke,et al.  Is seeing a virtual environment like seeing the real thing? , 2009, APGV '09.

[20]  Joseph R. Madsen,et al.  Human theta oscillations exhibit task dependence during virtual maze navigation , 1999, Nature.

[21]  D. O. Walter,et al.  Temporal stability and individual differences in the human EEG: an analysis of variance of spectral values. , 1968, IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering.

[22]  J. Dichgans,et al.  Visual-Vestibular Interaction: Effects on Self-Motion Perception and Postural Control , 1978 .

[23]  W. Klimesch Memory processes, brain oscillations and EEG synchronization. , 1996, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[24]  Bernhard E. Riecke,et al.  Influence of Ethnicity, Gender and Answering Mode on a Virtual Point-to-Origin Task , 2016, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[25]  Hermann J Müller,et al.  Evidence of separable spatial representations in a virtual navigation task. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[26]  Dick de Waard,et al.  The measurement of drivers' mental workload , 1996 .

[27]  John H. Bailey,et al.  Virtual spaces and real world places: transfer of route knowledge , 1996, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[28]  Walter F. Bischof,et al.  Spatial Navigation in Virtual Reality Environments: An EEG Analysis , 2003, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[29]  Anthony E. Richardson,et al.  Spatial knowledge acquisition from maps and from navigation in real and virtual environments , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[30]  M Congedo,et al.  A review of classification algorithms for EEG-based brain–computer interfaces , 2007, Journal of neural engineering.

[31]  M. Corner,et al.  Individual differences in the human electroencephalogram during quiet wakefulness. , 1979, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[32]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Spatial updating in virtual reality: the sufficiency of visual information , 2007, Psychological research.

[33]  John L. Sibert,et al.  Heart rate variability: indicator of user state as an aid to human-computer interaction , 1998, CHI.

[34]  J. Loomis,et al.  Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[35]  William H. Warren,et al.  Optic flow is used to control human walking , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[36]  Weidong Huang,et al.  Measuring Effectiveness of Graph Visualizations: A Cognitive Load Perspective , 2009, Inf. Vis..

[37]  Arne D. Ekstrom,et al.  Human hippocampal theta activity during virtual navigation , 2005, Hippocampus.

[38]  Weidong Huang,et al.  Using eye tracking to investigate graph layout effects , 2007, 2007 6th International Asia-Pacific Symposium on Visualization.

[39]  Simon Lessels,et al.  For Efficient Navigational Search, Humans Require Full Physical Movement, but Not a Rich Visual Scene , 2006, Psychological science.

[40]  A. Newell You can't play 20 questions with nature and win : projective comments on the papers of this symposium , 1973 .