Quantitative Quality Assessment of Microscopic Image Mosaicing

The mosaicing technique has been employed in more and more application fields, from entertainment to scientific ones. In the latter case, often the final evaluation is still left to human beings, that assess visually the quality of the mosaic. Many times, a lack of objective measurements in microscopic mosaicing may prevent the mosaic from being used as a starting image for further analysis. In this work we analyze three different metrics and indexes, in the domain of signal analysis, image analysis and visual quality, to measure the quality of different aspects of the mosaicing procedure, such as registration errors and visual quality. As the case study we consider the mosaicing algorithm we developed. The experiments have been carried out by considering mosaics with very different features: histological samples, that are made of detailed and contrasted images, and live stem cells, that show a very low contrast and low detail levels.

[1]  Yogesh G. Patel,et al.  Confocal mosaicing microscopy in skin excisions: a demonstration of rapid surgical pathology , 2009, Journal of microscopy.

[2]  Alessandro Bevilacqua,et al.  Semi-automatic Background Detection in Microscopic Images , 2010 .

[3]  J.-Y. Bouguet,et al.  Pyramidal implementation of the lucas kanade feature tracker , 1999 .

[4]  Alessandro Bevilacqua,et al.  Predicting Biological Age from a Skin Surface Capacitive Analysis , 2004 .

[5]  Changming Sun,et al.  Mosaicing of microscope images with global geometric and radiometric corrections , 2006, Journal of microscopy.

[6]  Stephan Rupp,et al.  Efficient large scale image stitching for virtual microscopy , 2008, 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[7]  A. Bovik,et al.  A universal image quality index , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[8]  Robert C. Bolles,et al.  Random sample consensus: a paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography , 1981, CACM.

[9]  Alessandro Bevilacqua,et al.  Joint Spatial and Tonal Mosaic Alignment for Motion Detection with PTZ Camera , 2006, ICIAR.

[10]  Ezzeddine Zagrouba,et al.  An efficient image-mosaicing method based on multifeature matching , 2009, Machine Vision and Applications.

[11]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  An Iterative Image Registration Technique with an Application to Stereo Vision , 1981, IJCAI.

[12]  Hassan Foroosh,et al.  Extension of phase correlation to subpixel registration , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..