Cued in: honey bee pheromones as information flow and collective decision-making

Recent studies using diverse disciplines ranging from classical behavioral assays to quantitative trait locus mapping, have revealed that chemical communication in honey bees is generally complex. Pheromones that are blends of multiple components are the rule rather than the exception. Subsets of multiple component blends regulate common and different systems. Reviewed are recent studies in pheromone regulation of colony defense, foraging ontogeny, and retinue behavior. Honey bee chemical communication is discussed as an emergent property of a complex system with dynamic properties calling for a complex systems approach of analysis. Apis mellifera / pheromone / chemical communication / social regulation / emergent property / complex system

[1]  M. Winston,et al.  Selection on worker honeybee responses to queen pheromone (Apis mellifera L.) , 2000, Naturwissenschaften.

[2]  G. C. Eickwort,et al.  Sociochemicals of bees , 1984 .

[3]  M. Fondrk,et al.  Quantitative trait loci for honey bee stinging behavior and body size. , 1998, Genetics.

[4]  R. E. Page,et al.  Sucrose responsiveness and behavioral plasticity in honey bees (Apis mellifera) , 2004 .

[5]  R. Boch,et al.  Identification of Iso-Amyl Acetate as an Active Component in the Sting Pheromone of the Honey Bee , 1962, Nature.

[6]  C. Masson,et al.  The kairomonal esters attractive to the Varroa jacobsoni mite in the queen brood , 1994 .

[7]  P. Allison.  Survival analysis using the SAS system : a practical guide , 1995 .

[8]  T. D. Seely.  Queen substance dispersal by messenger workers in honeybee colonies , 1979, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[9]  G. Robinson,et al.  Primer effects of a brood pheromone on honeybee behavioural development , 2001, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  T. Pankiw,et al.  Brood pheromone modulates honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) sucrose response thresholds , 2001, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[11]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Survival analysis using the SAS system , 1995 .

[12]  M. Blum,et al.  Bioassay of compounds derived from the honeybee sting , 1982, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[13]  M. Blum,et al.  Eclectic chemisociality of the honeybee , 1988, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[14]  Mark L. Winston,et al.  The effect of queen pheromones on worker honey bee ovary development , 2003, Naturwissenschaften.

[15]  Y. Le Conte,et al.  Effect of a brood pheromone on honeybee hypopharyngeal glands. , 1996, Comptes rendus de l'Academie des sciences. Serie III, Sciences de la vie.

[16]  Michael D. Breed,et al.  Does Honey Bee Sting Alarm Pheromone Give Orientation Information to Defensive Bees? , 2000 .

[17]  R. E. Page,et al.  Quantitative trait loci influencing honeybee alarm pheromone levels. , 1999, The Journal of heredity.

[18]  QUEEN REARING BY HIGH AND LOW QUEEN MANDIBULAR PHEROMONE RESPONDING WORKER HONEY BEES ( APIS MELLIFERA L.) , 1997 .

[19]  M. Winston,et al.  INTRA-NEST TRANSMISSION OF AROMATIC HONEY BEE QUEEN MANDIBULAR GLAND PHEROMONE COMPONENTS: MOVEMENT AS A UNIT , 1992, The Canadian Entomologist.

[20]  G. Hunt,et al.  Discovery of 3-Methyl-2-Buten-1-Yl Acetate, a New Alarm Component in the Sting Apparatus of Africanized Honeybees , 2003, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[21]  M. Winston,et al.  Variation in worker response to honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) queen mandibular pheromone (Hymenoptera: Apidae) , 2005, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[22]  M. Winston,et al.  Semiochemical basis of the retinue response to queen honey bees , 1988, Nature.

[23]  Tanya Pankiw,et al.  Directional change in a suite of foraging behaviors in tropical and temperate evolved honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) , 2003, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[24]  K. Naumann.  Grooming behaviors and the translocation of queen mandibular gland pheromone on worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L) , 1991 .

[25]  M. Winston,et al.  Movement of honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) queen mandibular gland pheromone in populous and unpopulous colonies , 1993, Journal of Insect Behavior.

[26]  I. Williams,et al.  (Z)-11-eicosen-1-ol, an important new pheromonal component from the sting of the honey bee,Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera, Apidae.) , 2004, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[27]  C. Masson,et al.  Temporal pheromonal and kairomonal secretion in the brood of honeybees , 1991, Naturwissenschaften.

[28]  R. E. Page,et al.  Effect of pheromones, hormones, and handling on sucrose response thresholds of honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) , 2003, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[29]  M. Winston,et al.  New components of the honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) queen retinue pheromone , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  M. Winston,et al.  Honeybee response to queen mandibular pheromone in laboratory bioassays , 1990, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[31]  C. Masson,et al.  Identification of a brood pheromone in honeybees , 1990, Naturwissenschaften.

[32]  M. Winston,et al.  Queen attendance behavior of worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L.) that are high and low responding to queen mandibular pheromone , 1995, Insectes Sociaux.

[33]  Y. Le Conte,et al.  Brood Pheromone Can Modulate the Feeding Behavior of Apis mellifera Workers (Hytnenoptera: Apidae) , 1995 .

[34]  N. Koeniger.  The biology of the honey bee , 1988, Insectes Sociaux.

[35]  M. Blum,et al.  Correlation Between Amounts of 2-Heptanone and Iso-Amyl Acetate in Honeybees and their Aggressive Behaviour , 1974 .

[36]  Watmough.  A general model of pheromone transmission within honey bee hives , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[37]  M. Winston,et al.  Production and transmission of honey bee queen (Apis mellifera L.) mandibular gland pheromone , 1991, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[38]  Y. Le Conte,et al.  Effect of Aliphatic Esters on Ovary Development of Queenless Bees (Apis mellifera L.) , 1998, Naturwissenschaften.