Extreme Risk Analysis of Interdependent Economic and Infrastructure Sectors

Willful attacks or natural disasters pose extreme risks to sectors of the economy. An extreme‐event analysis extension is proposed for the Inoperability Input‐Output Model (IIM) and the Dynamic IIM (DIIM), which are analytical methodologies for assessing the propagated consequences of initial disruptions to a set of sectors. The article discusses two major risk categories that the economy typically experiences following extreme events: (i) significant changes in consumption patterns due to lingering public fear and (ii) adjustments to the production outputs of the interdependent economic sectors that are necessary to match prevailing consumption levels during the recovery period. Probability distributions associated with changes in the consumption of directly affected sectors are generated based on trends, forecasts, and expert evidence to assess the expected losses of the economy. Analytical formulations are derived to quantify the extreme risks associated with a set of initially affected sectors. In addition, Monte Carlo simulation is used to handle the more complex calculations required for a larger set of sectors and general types of probability distributions. A two‐sector example is provided at the end of the article to illustrate the proposed extreme risk model formulations.

[1]  Eric O'N. Fisher,et al.  The Structure of the American Economy , 2008 .

[2]  Yacov Y Haimes,et al.  Systemic Valuation of Strategic Preparedness Through Application of the Inoperability Input‐Output Model with Lessons Learned from Hurricane Katrina , 2007, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[3]  Yacov Y. Haimes,et al.  Managing the risk of terrorism to interdependent infrastructure systems through the dynamic inoperability input–output model , 2006, Syst. Eng..

[4]  James H. Lambert,et al.  Inoperability Input-Output Model for Interdependent Infrastructure Sectors. I: Theory and Methodology , 2005 .

[5]  James H. Lambert,et al.  Inoperability Input-Output Model for Interdependent Infrastructure Sectors. II: Case Studies , 2005 .

[6]  Y. Haimes Risk Modeling, Assessment, and Management: Haimes/Risk Modeling, Assessment 2e , 2005 .

[7]  A. Rose,et al.  Modeling Regional Economic Resilience to Disasters: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis of Water Service Disruptions , 2005 .

[8]  Douglas S. Meade,et al.  Wassily Leontief and Input -- Output Economics , 2005 .

[9]  Joost R. Santos,et al.  Modeling the Demand Reduction Input‐Output (I‐O) Inoperability Due to Terrorism of Interconnected Infrastructures * , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[10]  Seung-Jun Kwak,et al.  The role of the four electric power sectors in the Korean national economy: an input–output analysis , 2004 .

[11]  Stephanie E. Chang,et al.  Modeling spatial and economic impacts of disasters , 2004 .

[12]  Vicent Alcántara,et al.  "Key" sectors in final energy consumption: an input-output application to the Spanish case , 2003 .

[13]  Manfred Lenzen,et al.  Environmental impact assessment including indirect effects—a case study using input–output analysis , 2003 .

[14]  Y. Haimes,et al.  Leontief-Based Model of Risk in Complex Interconnected Infrastructures , 2001 .

[15]  Michael L. Lahr,et al.  Input-output analysis: frontiers and extensions , 2001 .

[16]  Y F Huang,et al.  Total waste-load control and allocation based on input-output analysis for Shenzhen, south China. , 2001, Journal of environmental management.

[17]  Phhilippe Jorion Value at Risk: The New Benchmark for Managing Financial Risk , 2000 .

[18]  Shin Ta Liu,et al.  Risk Modeling, Assessment, and Management , 1999, Technometrics.

[19]  Stephanie E. Chang,et al.  The Regional Economic Impact of an Earthquake: Direct and Indirect Effects of Electricity Lifeline Disruptions , 1997 .

[20]  C. S. Holling Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems , 1973 .

[21]  W. Leontief Input-output economics , 1967 .