Adaptation pathways in planning for uncertain climate change: Applications in Portugal, the Czech Republic and the Netherlands

Adaptation pathways are developed to design adaptive policies to handle climate change uncertainty. Use of this tool varies across planning practices and adaptation challenges and adjusting the tool to particular practices can foster its adequate use. To gain insight into the use of adaptation pathways, we compared four initiatives (one each in Portugal and the Czech Republic and two in the Netherlands) with regard to design choices made. We found six design choices which need to be considered when adjusting adaptation pathways. Design choices about the geographic scale, inclusion of sectors, the generation and delineation of adaptation options, specification of possible pathways, the related performance metrics and the type of assessment are interdependent, but they are also influenced by contextual aspects. Analysis of the institutional diversity, planning culture and framing shows that the use of adaptation pathways is flexible enough to be adjusted for diverging planning practices. However, the tool is best suited to deliver local adaptation solutions, and adequate use depends on consensus about the adaptation problem, setting objective thresholds and determining uncertainty about future change. We conclude that understanding the customised use of tools for local planning practices is essential for adaptive policy design.

[1]  P. Driessen,et al.  "Cool" governance of a "hot" climate issue: public and private responsibilities for the protection of vulnerable citizens against extreme heat , 2015, Regional Environmental Change.

[2]  F. Klijn,et al.  Explaining differences in flood management approaches in Europe and in the USA – a comparative analysis , 2017 .

[3]  J. Barton.  Climate Change Adaptive Capacity in Santiago de Chile: Creating a Governance Regime for Sustainability Planning , 2013 .

[4]  Antje Bruns,et al.  Urban planning lock-in: implications for the realization of adaptive options towards climate change risks , 2014 .

[5]  Ringo Ossewaarde,et al.  Decentralization , 2012 .

[6]  M. Trnka,et al.  Projection of drought-inducing climate conditions in the Czech Republic according to Euro-CORDEX models , 2016 .

[7]  Marjolijn Haasnoot,et al.  What it took to catalyse uptake of dynamic adaptive pathways planning to address climate change uncertainty , 2017 .

[8]  Johannes Klein,et al.  Climate change adaptation in practice: from strategy development to implementation. , 2013 .

[9]  M. Hajer.  Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void , 2003 .

[10]  Warren E. Walker,et al.  Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: A method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world , 2013 .

[11]  Marjolijn Haasnoot,et al.  Lessons learnt from adaptation planning in four deltas and coastal cities , 2015 .

[12]  J. Špilková,et al.  Czech Physical Planning at the Crossroads: Towards the Regulation of Large-Scale Retail Developments? , 2010 .

[13]  Mark Zandvoort,et al.  The replacement of hydraulic structures in light of tipping points , 2015 .

[14]  F. D. Santos,et al.  Participation, scenarios and pathways in long-term planning for climate change adaptation , 2016 .

[15]  S. Karstens.  Bridging Boundaries: Making scale choices in multi-actor policy analysis on water management , 2009 .

[16]  W. Deursen,et al.  Exploring pathways for sustainable water management in river deltas in a changing environment , 2010, Climatic Change.

[17]  R. Pielke.  Rethinking the role of adaptation in climate policy , 1998 .

[18]  Andreas Faludi.  The Netherlands: A country with a soft spot for planning , 2002 .

[19]  Susana Guerreiro,et al.  Are we all on the same boat? The challenge of adaptation facing Portuguese coastal communities: Risk perception, trust-building and genuine participation , 2014 .

[20]  Arwin van Buuren,et al.  Boundaries in action: a framework to analyse boundary actions in multifunctional land-use developments , 2015 .

[21]  J. Kwadijk,et al.  Using adaptation tipping points to prepare for climate change and sea level rise: a case study in the Netherlands , 2010 .

[22]  Gil Penha-Lopes,et al.  Climate adaptation, transitions, and socially innovative action-research approaches , 2016 .

[23]  Frans Klijn,et al.  Navigating amid uncertainty in spatial planning , 2018 .

[24]  Ron Janssen,et al.  Collaborative use of geodesign tools to support decision-making on adaptation to climate change , 2015, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[25]  D. Henstra,et al.  The tools of climate adaptation policy: analysing instruments and instrument selection , 2016 .

[26]  A. Jordan,et al.  What have we Learned from Policy Transfer Research? Dolowitz and Marsh Revisited , 2011 .

[27]  Kasper Kok,et al.  Combining backcasting and exploratory scenarios to develop robust water strategies in face of uncertain futures , 2013, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.