A focus on students’ use of Twitter – their interactions with each other, content and interface

In their advertising campaigns, universities depict students using computers, laptops, mobile phones, iPads and tablets as learning devices. Regardless of the marketing used, there is value in enlisting the advantages of any medium that can aid deep thinking and increase student engagement. This study offers new knowledge about conceptualising Twitter as a knowledge construction tool leveraged through mobile devices. A qualitative approach was conducted to investigate the learning outcomes of students’ use of Twitter when it was implemented as a learning device. The use of Twitter was investigated to provide insight into the ways students and instructors interacted in this environment, how the content was made active and how the functionality of the tool and its conceptualisation impedes and/or supports the learning process. The results indicate that student-initiated interaction supported by instructor use of participatory pedagogies enables substantive dialogue through Twitter and that paraphrasing was the most common way students made learning active.

[1]  Christian Dalsgaard,et al.  Social software: E-learning beyond learning management systems , 2006 .

[2]  Anthony Betrus.  Historical Evolution of Instructional Technology in Teacher Education Programs: A Ten-Year Update , 2012 .

[3]  M. Moore.  Editorial: Three types of interaction , 1989 .

[4]  Brent I Fox,et al.  TECHNOLOGY IN PHARMACY EDUCATION Use of Twitter to Encourage Interaction in a Multi-campus Pharmacy Management Course , 2011 .

[5]  Lori B. Holcomb,et al.  The Use of Alternative Social Networking Sites in Higher Educational Settings: A Case Study of the E-Learning Benefits of Ning in Education , 2010 .

[6]  Márta Turcsányi-Szabó.  Aiming at sustainable innovation in teacher education - From theory to practice , 2012, Informatics Educ..

[7]  Danah Boyd,et al.  I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience , 2011, New Media Soc..

[8]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Learning to Solve Problems with Technology: A Constructivist Perspective , 2002 .

[9]  Roger Burrows,et al.  Sociology and, of and in Web 2.0: Some Initial Considerations , 2007 .

[10]  John H. Mott,et al.  Envisioning the Post-LMS Era: The Open Learning Network , 2010 .

[11]  Royce Kimmons,et al.  Instructor experiences with a social networking site in a higher education setting: expectations, frustrations, appropriation, and compartmentalization , 2013 .

[12]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[13]  E. Kassens-Noor.  Twitter as a teaching practice to enhance active and informal learning in higher education: The case of sustainable tweets , 2012 .

[14]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Social Network Sites: Definition, History, and Scholarship , 2007, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[15]  David A. Erlandson.  Doing Naturalistic Inquiry: A Guide to Methods , 1993 .

[16]  J. Brown,et al.  Minds on Fire: Open Education, the Long Tail, and Learning 2.0 , 2008 .

[17]  Mark Bullen,et al.  What is Instructional Design , 2014 .

[18]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[19]  Cesar C. Navarrete,et al.  Online social networks as formal learning environments: Learner experiences and activities , 2012 .

[20]  Thomas C. Reeves,et al.  Online learning as information delivery: Digital myopia , 2004 .

[21]  Martin Ebner,et al.  Microblogs in Higher Education - A chance to facilitate informal and process-oriented learning? , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[22]  Rachel Reuben.  The Use of Social Media in Higher Education for Marketing and Communications: A Guide for Professionals in Higher Education , 2008 .

[23]  David Ley,et al.  6 – Emerging technologies for learning , 2010 .

[24]  Thomas A. Schwandt.  Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. , 1994 .

[25]  Daniel C. A. Hillman,et al.  Learner-Interface Interaction in Distance Education: An Extension of Contemporary Models and Strategies for Practitioners , 1994 .

[26]  Petter Bae Brandtzæg,et al.  A typology of social networking sites users , 2011, Int. J. Web Based Communities.

[27]  Ian Mugridge.  Growth and Structure of Distance Education , 1987 .

[28]  J. Reid.  "We don't Twitter, we Facebook": An alternative pedagogical space that enables critical practices in relation to writing , 2011 .

[29]  E. Guba,et al.  Naturalistic inquiry: Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985, 416 pp., $25.00 (Cloth) , 1985 .

[30]  K. Askins.  In and beyond the classroom: research ethics and participatory pedagogies , 2008 .

[31]  Partnerships in Action: Self-directed Community Learning , 2004 .

[32]  Sarah Prestridge.  ICT professional development for teachers in online forums: analysing the role of discussion , 2010 .

[33]  S. Cobb,et al.  Social Presence and Online Learning: A Current View from a Research Perspective. , 2009 .

[34]  G. Veletsianos,et al.  Scholars and faculty members' lived experiences in online social networks , 2013, Internet High. Educ..

[35]  E. Guba,et al.  Competing paradigms in qualitative research. , 1994 .

[36]  S. Minocha.  Role of Social Software Tools in Education: A Literature Review. , 2009 .

[37]  A. Ellis,et al.  Assuring the quality of online learning in Australian higher education , 2001 .

[38]  유창조.  Naturalistic Inquiry , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[39]  Sarah Prestridge,et al.  Teachers’ talk in professional development activity that supports change in their ICT pedagogical beliefs and practices , 2009 .

[40]  Beverly D. Payne,et al.  A Vygotskian-based theory of teacher cognition: Toward the acquisition of mental reflection and self-regulation , 1993 .

[41]  N. Denzin,et al.  Handbook of Qualitative Research , 1994 .

[42]  S Al-KhalifaHend.  Twitter in academia , 2008 .

[43]  Nicholas M. Allix.  Book Review: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 2000 .

[44]  What Factors Influence the Formation of Teachers' Professional Communities and Why Should We Care?. , 2002 .

[45]  Michael DeSchryver,et al.  Moodle vs. Facebook: Does using Facebook for Discussions in an Online Course Enhance Perceived Social Presence and Student Interaction? , 2009 .