Coping with Isolation: the role of culture in adult distance learners' use of surrogates

Conceptions of learning and preferred learning approaches have been suggested to vary cross-culturally. The extent to which learning is ‘student-centred’ or ‘teacher-centred’ also appears subject to cultural variation. This has led some to conclude that particular cultures exhibit learning preferences more suited to distance learning than do other cultures. This article examines the strategies that students from varying cultural backgrounds use to manage the experience of the isolation of distance learning. Two distinct isolation experiences emerge that reflect differences in the perceptions of the student–teacher relationship. These, it is argued, can be classified as a ‘surrogate teacher’ model in the Asian cultures of Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia and a ‘student identity’ model in Europe.

[1]  H. Reinert.  One picture is worth a thousand words? Not necessarily. , 1976 .

[2]  S. Chan.  The Chinese Learner--A Question of Style. , 1999 .

[3]  J. Biggs,et al.  The Chinese Learner: Cultural, Psychological, and Contextual Influences. , 1996 .

[4]  N. Entwistle,et al.  Understanding Student Learning , 1983 .

[5]  M. Keaney.  Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Cultural Diversity in Business , 1999 .

[6]  Oliver H. M. Yau,et al.  Consumer Behaviour in China: Customer Satisfaction and Cultural Values , 1994 .

[7]  M. Bond.  Beyond the Chinese face , 1991 .

[8]  Cross‐cultural perspectives on higher education in East Asia: Psychological effects upon Asian students , 1989 .

[9]  Diana Laurillard,et al.  Rethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology , 1993 .

[10]  P. Kennedy,et al.  Lifelong Learning in Action: Hong Kong Practitioners' Perspectives. , 2002 .

[11]  G. Boulton‐Lewis,et al.  Variations in Conceptions of Learning in Construction Technology: Implications for learning , 2000 .

[12]  Dee G. Appley.  Beyond Culture , 1977 .

[13]  J. Biggs.  Student Approaches to Learning and Studying , 1987 .

[14]  T. Parsons,et al.  Toward a General Theory of Action , 1952 .

[15]  Olugbemiro J. Jegede,et al.  Differences between low and high achieving distance learners in locus of control and metacognition , 1999 .

[16]  H. A. Witkin,et al.  Studies in space orientation; further experiments on perception of the upright with displaced visual fields. , 1948, Journal of experimental psychology.

[17]  G. Hofstede,et al.  Culture′s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values , 1980 .

[18]  R. Dunn,et al.  Research on the Learning Style Characteristics of Selected Racial and Ethnic Groups. , 1990 .

[19]  F. Strodtbeck,et al.  Variations in value orientations. , 1961 .

[20]  David Kember,et al.  Misconceptions about the learning approaches, motivation and study practices of Asian students , 2000 .

[21]  F. Marton,et al.  Conceptions of learning , 1993 .

[22]  N. Entwistle.  Contrasting Perspectives on Learning , 2005 .

[23]  Victoria Chan.  Learning Autonomously: The learners' perspectives , 2001 .

[24]  E. Sadler‐Smith.  ‘Learning Style’: frameworks and instruments , 1997 .

[25]  楊國樞,et al.  Chinese Values and the Search for Culture-Free Dimensions of Culture , 1987 .

[26]  David Kember,et al.  Towards self‐direction in study methods: The ways in which new students learn to study part‐time , 2000 .

[27]  Neil J. Anderson,et al.  A crosscultural view of learning styles , 1995, Language Teaching.

[28]  Inn Youn.  The Culture Specificity of Epistemological Beliefs about Learning , 2000 .

[29]  Fiona Hyland,et al.  Providing Effective Support: Investigating feedback to distance language learners , 2001 .

[30]  John T. E. Richardson.  Field independence in higher education and the case of distance learning , 1998 .

[31]  Eugene Sadler-Smith,et al.  Learning Preferences and Cognitive Style , 2000 .

[32]  R. Riding,et al.  Cognitive Styles—an overview and integration , 1991 .

[33]  Elaine Martin,et al.  SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT AND SIXTH FORM PUPILS‘ APPROACHES TO LEARNING , 1989 .

[34]  P. Ramsden,et al.  THE EXPERIENCE OF LEARNING THE CONTEXT OF LEARNING IN ACADEMIC DEPARTMENTS 199198 CHAPTER THIRTEEN The Context of Learning in Academic Departments , 2005 .

[35]  David Smith,et al.  Classroom Learning Environments and Students' Approaches to Learning , 1999 .

[36]  C. Phillips,et al.  Culture, Style, and the Educative Process , 1989 .

[37]  Steven Albert,et al.  A New Approach to Computer-aided Distance Learning: The 'Automated Tutor' , 2000 .

[38]  O. Jegede,et al.  Gender Differences in Factors Influencing Achievement of Distance Education Students , 2001 .

[39]  P. Young.  'I Might as Well Give Up': Self-esteem and mature students' feelings about feedback on assignments , 2000 .