The influence of language on theory of mind: a training study.

This study investigated the role of language in the development of theory of mind. It was hypothesized that the acquisition of the syntactic and semantic properties of sentential complements would facilitate the development of a representational theory of mind. Sixty preschoolers who failed false belief and sentential complement pretests were randomly assigned to training on false belief, sentential complements, or relative clauses (as a control group). All the children were post-tested on a set of different theory of mind tasks, sentential complements and relative clauses. The main findings were that the group trained on sentential complements not only acquired the linguistic knowledge fostered by the training, but also significantly increased their scores on a range of theory of mind tasks. In contrast, false belief training only led to improved theory of mind scores but had no influence on language. The control group, trained on relative clauses, showed no improvement on theory of mind posttests. These findings are taken as evidence that the acquisition of sentential complements contributes to the development of theory of mind in preschoolers.

[1]  Kimberly A. Townsend A study of comparisons between the Joliet three minute speech and language screen and the Test of early language development (TELD) , 1985 .

[2]  V. Slaughter,et al.  Children's understanding of pictorial and mental representations. , 1998, Child development.

[3]  A. Gopnik How we know our minds: The illusion of first-person knowledge of intentionality , 1993, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[4]  T. Charman,et al.  TEACHING FALSE BELIEF AND VISUAL PERSPECTIVE TAKING SKILLS IN YOUNG CHILDREN: CAN A THEORY OF MIND BE TRAINED? , 2000 .

[5]  J. Astington,et al.  A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory-of-mind development. , 1999, Developmental psychology.

[6]  Simon Baron-Cohen,et al.  Understanding other minds: Perspectives from developmental cognitive neuroscience, 2nd ed. , 2000 .

[7]  D. Zaitchik,et al.  When representations conflict with reality: The preschooler's problem with false beliefs and “false” photographs , 1990, Cognition.

[8]  J. Perner,et al.  Theory of mind and executive function: Is there a developmental relationship? , 2000 .

[9]  A. Leslie,et al.  Inhibitory processing in the false belief task: Two conjectures , 1998 .

[10]  J. Astington,et al.  Cognitive Factors and Family Structure Associated with Theory of Mind Development in Young Children. , 1996 .

[11]  Jennie E. Pyers,et al.  Complementing Cognition: The Relationship between Language and Theory of Mind , 1997 .

[12]  H. Wimmer,et al.  Young children's conception of lying: Lexical realism—Moral subjectivism , 1984 .

[13]  Alan M. Leslie,et al.  How to acquire a ‘representational theory of mind’ , 1999 .

[14]  J. Perner Understanding the Representational Mind , 1993 .

[15]  M. Siegal,et al.  Children's theory of mind and the conversational territory of cognitive development. , 1994 .

[16]  Daniel C. Dennett,et al.  Beliefs about beliefs [P&W, SR&B] , 1978, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[17]  M. Siegal,et al.  Deafness, conversation and theory of mind. , 1995, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[18]  J. Flavell The development of children's knowledge about the appearance-reality distinction. , 1986, The American psychologist.

[19]  Alison Gopnik,et al.  How we know our minds , 1993 .

[20]  Alison Gopnik,et al.  Theoretical explanations of children's understanding of the mind , 1991 .

[21]  M. Siegal,et al.  Preschoolers' understanding of lies and innocent and negligent mistakes. , 1998, Developmental psychology.

[22]  H. Wimmer,et al.  Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception , 1983, Cognition.

[23]  L. Moses,et al.  Individual differences in inhibitory control and children's theory of mind. , 2001, Child development.

[24]  P. Mitchell,et al.  Children's early understanding of false belief , 1991, Cognition.

[25]  Jill de Villiers,et al.  Language and theory of mind: What are the developmental relationships? , 2000 .

[26]  John H. Flavell,et al.  Development of the appearance-reality distinction , 1983, Cognitive Psychology.

[27]  J. Dunn,et al.  Theory of mind, emotion understanding, language, and family background: individual differences and interrelations. , 1999, Child development.

[28]  B. Scholl,et al.  Minds, modules, and meta-analysis. , 2001, Child development.

[29]  J. Villiers,et al.  Linguistic determinism and the understanding of false beliefs. , 2000 .

[30]  A. Leslie,et al.  Solving belief problems: toward a task analysis , 1998, Cognition.

[31]  A. Leslie,et al.  Competence and performance in false belief understanding: A comparison of autistic and normal 3-year-old children. , 1999 .

[32]  H. Wellman,et al.  Knowledge acquisition in foundational domains. , 1998 .

[33]  H. Wellman,et al.  Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: the truth about false belief. , 2001, Child development.

[34]  J. Dunn,et al.  “Pretend you didn't know”: Preschoolers' talk about mental states in pretend play ☆ , 1997 .

[35]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Children's understanding of representational change and its relation to the understanding of false belief and the appearance-reality distinction. , 1988, Child development.

[36]  L. Moses,et al.  The role of inhibitory processes in young children's difficulties with deception and false belief. , 1998, Child development.

[37]  A. Gopnik,et al.  The theory theory. , 1994 .

[38]  R. Gordon,et al.  Theories of theories of mind: ‘Radical’ simulationism , 1996 .

[39]  M. Forrester Agency: Its role in mental development , 1999 .

[40]  Henry M. Wellman,et al.  Developing understandings of mind , 2000 .

[41]  Young children's conception of lying: Moral intuition and the denotation and connotation of "to lie." , 1985 .

[42]  J. Astington,et al.  Theory of mind development and social understanding. , 1995 .

[43]  B. Bower A Child's Theory of Mind , 1993 .

[44]  P. Bloom,et al.  Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind , 2000, Cognition.

[45]  L J Moses,et al.  Executive accounts of theory-of-mind development. , 2001, Child development.

[46]  Claire Hughes,et al.  Executive function in preschoolers: Links with theory of mind and verbal ability , 1998 .

[47]  Brian J. Scholl,et al.  Modularity, Development and ‘Theory of Mind’ , 1999 .

[48]  H. Wimmer,et al.  Three-year-olds' difficulty with false belief: The case for a conceptual deficit , 1987 .

[49]  J. A. Fodor A theory of the child's theory of mind , 1992, Cognition.

[50]  S. Carey Conceptual Change in Childhood , 1985 .

[51]  A. Gopnik,et al.  Conceptual coherence in the child's theory of mind: training children to understand belief. , 1996, Child development.

[52]  M. Siegal,et al.  Where to look first for children's knowledge of false beliefs , 1991, Cognition.

[53]  N. Freeman,et al.  Making explicit 3-year-olds' implicit competence with their own false beliefs , 1995, Cognition.

[54]  Paul L. Harris,et al.  From Simulation to Folk Psychology: The Case for Development , 1992 .