Static and dynamic validation of inertial measurement units.

Optical motion capture systems are used to assess human motion. While these systems provide a reliable analysis, they limit collection to a laboratory based setting. Devices such as Inertial Measurement Units (IMUs) have been developed as alternative tools. Commercially available IMUs are utilized for a variety of applications; however limited work has been done to determine the reliability of these devices. The objective of this study was to assess the accuracy and precision of a commercially available IMU, containing tri-axial accelerometers, gyroscopes, and magnetometers, under controlled static and dynamic conditions. The sensor output was validated against the gold standard measures of custom made mechanical testing apparatuses. The IMUs provide an accurate (within 0.6°) and precise (within 0.1°) measurement of static sensor orientation and an accurate (within 4.4° per second) and precise (within 0.2° per second) representation of angular velocity. The sensors are more accurate at lower velocities, but the percent error remains relatively constant across all angular velocities. Inclusion of IMUs as an appropriate measurement tool should be based on the application, specific demands and necessary reliability.

[1]  Patrick Boissy,et al.  Inertial Measures of Motion for Clinical Biomechanics: Comparative Assessment of Accuracy under Controlled Conditions - Effect of Velocity , 2013, PloS one.

[2]  M. Pain,et al.  Maximum Velocities in Flexion and Extension Actions for Sport , 2016, Journal of human kinetics.

[3]  Barry K. Gilbert,et al.  Methods for validating the performance of wearable motion-sensing devices under controlled conditions , 2009 .

[4]  Scott L Delp,et al.  Quantified self and human movement: a review on the clinical impact of wearable sensing and feedback for gait analysis and intervention. , 2014, Gait & posture.

[5]  D. Altman,et al.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies , 1999, Statistical methods in medical research.

[6]  Trevor Kingsbury,et al.  Mechanical testing for three-dimensional motion analysis reliability. , 2016, Gait & posture.

[7]  Kamiar Aminian,et al.  3D gait assessment in young and elderly subjects using foot-worn inertial sensors. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  Peter H Veltink,et al.  Accelerometer and rate gyroscope measurement of kinematics: an inexpensive alternative to optical motion analysis systems. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  V Baltzopoulos,et al.  The demands of stair descent relative to maximum capacities in elderly and young adults. , 2008, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[10]  P. Riley,et al.  Sit to stand from progressively lower seat heights -- alterations in angular velocity. , 1996, Clinical biomechanics.

[11]  S. Werner,et al.  Relationships between ball velocity and throwing mechanics in collegiate baseball pitchers. , 2008, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.