Understanding the NIMBY and LULU Phenomena: Reassessing Our Knowledge Base and Informing Future Research

A substantial amount of research relative to the not in my backyard (NIMBY) and locally unwanted land use (LULU) phenomena has been conducted during the past two decades. The article begins by illustrating the complex nature of these phenomena, noting variation in the types of facilities considered LULUs, the range of participants who exhibit NIMBY responses, and the varied manner in which these phenomena have been described. The focus of the article then moves to the influence of perceptions relative to NIMBY and methods available to respond to NIMBY concerns. The article summarizes research in these areas with the purpose of reminding us of what we know about NIMBY and LULU phenomena and what continues to challenge planning practitioners. The literature review points to research opportunities and the need to integrate the findings of previously distinct areas of inquiry to inform planning practice.

[1]  S. Tesh,et al.  Citizen experts in environmental risk , 1999 .

[2]  Douglas J. Lober,et al.  Resolving the Siting Impasse: Modeling social and Environmental Locational Criteria with a Geographic Information System , 1995 .

[3]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Entanglement of Interests and Motives: Assumptions behind the NIMBY-theory on Facility Siting , 1994 .

[4]  P Slovic,et al.  Perceived risk, stigma, and potential economic impacts of a high-level nuclear waste repository in Nevada. , 1991, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  Michael Dear,et al.  The Changing Dynamics of Community Opposition to Human Service Facilities , 1997 .

[6]  A. Fleischmann,et al.  Politics, Administration, and Local Land-Use Regulation: Analyzing Zoning as a Policy Process , 1989 .

[7]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[8]  Joel Huber,et al.  The Efficiency of Political Mechanisms for Siting Nuisance Facilities: Are Opponents More Likely to Participate than Supporters? , 2001 .

[9]  James C. Clingermayer.  Heresthetics and Happenstance: Intentional and Unintentional Exclusionary Impacts of the Zoning Decision-making Process , 2004 .

[10]  Rolf Pendall,et al.  Opposition to Housing , 1999 .

[11]  I. Young,et al.  Justice, Democracy, and Hazardous Siting , 1998 .

[12]  G. Busenberg,et al.  Collaborative and adversarial analysis in environmental policy , 1999 .

[13]  F. Deng.  The Rebound of Private Zoning: Property Rights and Local Governance in Urban Land Use , 2003 .

[14]  Michal Heiman,et al.  From ‘Not in My Backyard!’ to ‘Not in Anybody's Backyard!’ , 1990 .

[15]  Douglas J. Lober,et al.  Why Protest?. Public Behavioral and Attitudinal Response to Siting a Waste Disposal Facility , 1995 .

[16]  Charles Piller.  The Fail-Safe Society: Community Defiance and the End of American Technological Optimism , 1991 .

[17]  M. Kraft.  Public And State Responses To High‐Level Nuclear Waste Disposal: Learning From Policy Failure , 1991 .

[18]  Baruch Fischhoff,et al.  Why Study Risk Perception , 1982 .

[19]  R. C. Kearney,et al.  The low-level radioactive waste siting process in Connecticut: Anatomy of a failure , 1994 .

[20]  Roy F. Baumeister,et al.  Self-Regulation of Cognitive Inference and Decision Processes , 1994 .

[21]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  The Dilemma of Siting a High-Level Nuclear Waste Repository , 1995 .

[22]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[23]  Euston Quah,et al.  The Siting Problem of Nimby Facilities: Cost – Benefit Analysis and Auction Mechanisms , 1998 .

[24]  J. Maantay,et al.  Zoning Law, Health, and Environmental Justice: What's the Connection? , 2002, Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

[25]  Timothy L Nyerges,et al.  Promoting transparency of long-term environmental decisions: the Hanford Decision Mapping System pilot project. , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[26]  Chris Zeiss,et al.  Waste Facility Impacts on Residential Property Values , 1989 .

[27]  Robert Futrell,et al.  Framing Processes, Cognitive Liberation, and NIMBY Protest in the U.S. Chemical‐Weapons Disposal Conflict , 2003 .

[28]  W. Freudenburg,et al.  NIMBYs and LULUs: Stalking the Syndromes , 1992 .

[29]  R. Lake,et al.  Planners' Alchemy Transforming NIMBY to YIMBY: Rethinking NIMBY , 1993 .

[30]  S. Cowan.  NIMBY syndrome and public consultation policy: the implications of a discourse analysis of local responses to the establishment of a community mental health facility. , 2003, Health & social care in the community.

[31]  L. Takahashi,et al.  Controversial Facility Siting in the Urban Environment , 1998 .

[32]  James C. Clingermayer.  Quasi-Judicial Decision Making and Exclusionary Zoning , 1996 .

[33]  B. Frey,et al.  The Old Lady Visits Your Backyard: A Tale of Morals and Markets , 1996, Journal of Political Economy.

[34]  S. Farber.  Undesirable facilities and property values: a summary of empirical studies , 1998 .

[35]  Don Luymes,et al.  PRIVATOPIA: HOMEOWNER ASSOCIATIONS AND THE RISE OF RESIDENTIAL PRIVATE GOVERNMENT , 1996, Landscape Journal.

[36]  Gail Bingham,et al.  Facility Siting and Public Opposition , 1985 .

[37]  L. Takahashi.  Homelessness, Aids, and Stigmatization: The Nimby Syndrome in the United States at the End of the Twentieth Century , 1999 .

[38]  J. Bryson,et al.  Fighting the Not-In-My-Backyard Syndrome in Minneapolis , 1991 .

[39]  Gary H. McClelland,et al.  The Effect of Risk Beliefs on Property Values: A Case Study of a Hazardous Waste Site1 , 1990 .

[40]  R. Rosenman,et al.  Perception costs and NIMBY , 1993 .

[41]  Howard Kunreuther,et al.  Public Attitudes Toward Siting a High‐Level Nuclear Waste Repository in Nevada , 1990 .

[42]  Z. Neeman,et al.  Effective Siting of Waste Treatment Facilities , 2002 .

[43]  R. Kasperson,et al.  Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks , 1992 .

[44]  V T Covello,et al.  The Determinants of Trust and Credibility in Environmental Risk Communication: An Empirical Study , 1997, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[45]  Susan Hunter,et al.  Beyond NIMBY. Explaining Opposition to Hazardous Waste Facilities , 1995 .

[46]  Christopher Snary,et al.  Understanding Risk: The Planning Officers' Perspective , 2004 .

[47]  Ruth Patrick,et al.  Managing the Risks of Hazardous Waste , 1991 .

[48]  Gregory E. McAvoy,et al.  Controlling Technocracy: Citizen Rationality and the NIMBY Syndrome , 1999 .

[49]  D. Brion,et al.  Essential Industry and the NIMBY Phenomenon , 1991 .

[50]  D. Green,et al.  NIMBY or NIABY: a logit model of opposition to solid-waste-disposal facility siting , 1994 .

[51]  Peter A. Groothuis,et al.  Locating Hazardous Waste Facilities: The Influence of NIMBY Beliefs , 1994 .

[52]  V. Basolo,et al.  Obstacles to Regional Housing Solutions: A Comparison of Four Metropolitan Areas , 2003 .

[53]  Sidney Plotkin,et al.  Property, policy and politics: towards a theory of urban land-use conflict , 1987 .

[54]  Gregory E. Mcavoy.  Partisan Probing and Democratic Decisionmaking Rethinking the Nimby Syndrome , 1998 .

[55]  R. Warland,et al.  Don’t Burn it Here: Grassroots Challenges to Trash Incinerators , 1997 .

[56]  C. Boone,et al.  Creating a Toxic Neighborhood in Los Angeles County , 1999 .

[57]  K. Pijawka,et al.  Reversing NIMBY: An Assessment of State Strategies for Siting Hazardous-Waste Facilities , 1999 .

[58]  B. Frey,et al.  Fair siting procedures: An empirical analysis of their importance and characteristics , 1996 .

[59]  B. Illsley,et al.  Good Neighbour Agreements: The first step to environmental justice? , 2002 .

[60]  Michael Dear,et al.  Understanding and Overcoming the NIMBY Syndrome , 1992 .

[61]  H. Bacot,et al.  Managing the Solid Waste Crisis , 1994 .

[62]  Michal Heiman,et al.  Science by the People: Grassroots Environmental Monitoring and the Debate Over Scientific Expertise , 1997 .

[63]  W. Fischel.  Why Are There NIMBYs? , 2001, Land Economics.

[64]  Frank J. Popper,et al.  The Environmentalist and the LULU , 1985 .

[65]  J. Mumpower,et al.  Risk Analysis and Risk Management: An Historical Perspective , 1985 .

[66]  R. Schiffer,et al.  INTRODUCTION , 1988, Neurology.

[67]  Gary Bryner,et al.  Beyond Nimby: Hazardous Waste Siting in Canada and the United States , 1995 .

[68]  James C. Clingermayer.  Electoral Representation, Zoning Politics, and the Exclusion of Group Homes , 1994 .

[69]  Eric R. A. N. Smith,et al.  The Other Side of the NIMBY Syndrome , 2000 .