Curve Prevalence of a New Classification of Operative Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Does Classification Correlate With Treatment?

Study Design. A retrospective multicenter consecutive case review of operative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Objectives. To define the curve prevalence of a large consecutive series of cases with operative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis as classified by a new system and to test the ability of this new classification system to correlate with regions of the scoliotic spine to be instrumented/fused. Summary of Background Data. A new comprehensive, two-dimensional classification system, intended to be treatment based, has been developed. However, it has not been tested whether all presenting operative cases of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis are classifiable in a large consecutive series, nor has the prevalence of specific curve types been determined. In addition, it is unknown whether this classification is truly treatment based, as to whether it can correlate with regions of the spine to be instrumented/fused. Methods. A multicenter retrospective review of 606 consecutive operative cases of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis was performed. All cases were classified by a new triad classification system, which included the following: a curve type (1–6), a lumbar spine modifier (A, B, C), and a sagittal thoracic modifier (−, N, +). Prevalence of the individual three components of the system and the classification grouping of all three components together were performed. In addition, the authors assessed whether this system could correlate with regions of the spine that should be included in the instrumentation and fusion, based on exactly which regions were fused during the operative procedure. Results. All 606 cases were classifiable by this system. Prevalence of the six curve types noted was as follows: Type 1, main thoracic (n = 305, 51%); Type 2, double thoracic (n = 118, 20%); Type 3, double major (n = 69, 11%); Type 4, triple major (n = 19, 3%); Type 5, thoracolumbar/lumbar (n = 74, 12%); and Type 6, thoracolumbar/lumbar–main thoracic (n = 17, 3%). The five most common curve classifications noted were as follows: 1AN, 1BN, 2AN, 5CN, and 1CN, which accounted for 58% of all curve classifications noted. An average of 90% of the operative cases had surgically structural regions of the spine included in the instrumentation and fusion as predicted by the curve type. Conclusions. A new comprehensive classification system for operative adolescent idiopathic scoliosis found all 606 consecutive cases of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis classifiable, with the Type 1, main thoracic curve pattern, the most common curve type found (51%). This new classification system appears to correlate with treatment of surgically structural regions of the spine fused in 90% of cases by the objective radiographic criteria used.

[1]  R R Betz,et al.  Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of the Classification of Thoracic Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis*† , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  C. L. Nash,et al.  A study of vertebral rotation. , 1969, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  R. Winter,et al.  Analysis of the Upper Thoracic Curve in Surgically Treated Idiopathic Scoliosis: A New Concept of the Double Thoracic Curve Pattern , 1993, Spine.

[4]  B. S. Richards,et al.  Lumbar Curve Response in Type II Idiopathic Scoliosis After Posterior Instrumentation of the Thoracic Curve , 1992, Spine.

[5]  R. Betz,et al.  Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: A New Classification to Determine Extent of Spinal Arthrodesis , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[6]  R. Betz,et al.  Spontaneous lumbar curve coronal correction after selective anterior or posterior thoracic fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. , 1999, Spine.

[7]  L. Lenke,et al.  Preventing Decompensation in King Type II Curves Treated With Cotrel‐Dubousset Instrumentation. Strict Guidelines for Selective Thoracic Fusion , 1992, Spine.

[8]  L. Lenke,et al.  Radiographic Results of Arthrodesis with Cotrel-Dubousset Instrumentation for the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. A Five to Ten-Year Follow-up Study*† , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  L. Lenke,et al.  Recognition and Treatment of the Proximal Thoracic Curve in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Treated with Cotrel‐Dubousset Instrumentation , 1994, Spine.

[10]  R. Betz,et al.  Sagittal Plane Analysis in Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients Treated with Cotrel-Dubousset Instrumentation , 1990, Spine.

[11]  R. Winter,et al.  The selection of fusion levels in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. , 1983, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[12]  J. Birch,et al.  Frontal Plane and Sagittal Plane Balance following Cotrel-Dubousset Instrumentation for Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1989, Spine.

[13]  R. Dickson The etiology and pathogenesis of idiopathic scoliosis. , 1992, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[14]  J. P. Thompson,et al.  Decompensation After Cotrel‐Dubousset Instrumentation of Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1990, Spine.

[15]  L. Lenke,et al.  Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. , 1992, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[16]  R. Betz,et al.  Comparison of anterior and posterior instrumentation for correction of adolescent thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. , 1999, Spine.

[17]  R. Betz,et al.  Coronal Decompensation Produced by Cotrel—Dubousset “Derotation” Maneuver for Idiopathic Right Thoracic Scoliosis , 1991, Spine.

[18]  R. Cummings,et al.  Interobserver Reliability and Intraobserver Reproducibility of the System of King et al. for the Classification of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis* , 1998, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[19]  M Bernhardt,et al.  Segmental Analysis of the Sagittal Plane Alignment of the Normal Thoracic and Lumbar Spines and Thoracolumbar Junction , 1989, Spine.

[20]  H. Shufflebarger,et al.  Fusion Levels and Hook Patterns in Thoracic Scoliosis with Cotrel‐Dubousset Instrumentation , 1990, Spine.

[21]  V. Kalen,et al.  The Behavior of the Unfused Lumbar Curve Following Selective Thoracic Fusion for Idiopathic Scoliosis , 1990, Spine.

[22]  J. Farcy,et al.  Results of Spinal Instrumentation of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis by King Type , 1992, Spine.

[23]  R. Betz,et al.  Sagittal plane analysis in idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. , 1990, Spine.