Comparing life cycle assessments of different biofuel options.

Life cycle assessment (LCA) has shown that first generation biofuels provide a little to no benefit for greenhouse gas (GHG) reductions compared to petroleum fuels, particularly when indirect effects are considered. Second generation fuels are intended to achieve greater GHG reductions and avoid other sustainability issues. LCAs of second generation biofuels exhibit great variability and uncertainty, leading to inconclusive results for the performance of particular pathways (combinations of feedstocks and fuels). Variability arises in part because of the prospective nature of LCAs for future fuels; however, a review of recent articles on biofuel LCA methodology indicates two additional sources of variability: real sources such as spatiotemporal heterogeneity, and methodological sources such as choices for co-product allocation methods and system boundary definition.

[1]  Russell W Stratton,et al.  Environmental performance of algal biofuel technology options. , 2012, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  M. Kaltschmitt,et al.  Analysis of greenhouse gas emissions from microalgae-based biofuels , 2012, Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery.

[3]  Y. Chisti.  Biodiesel from microalgae. , 2007, Biotechnology advances.

[4]  Corinne Le Quéré,et al.  Rapid growth in CO2 emissions after the 2008-2009 global financial crisis , 2011 .

[5]  A. Horvath,et al.  Grand challenges for life-cycle assessment of biofuels. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[6]  Alissa Kendall,et al.  Time-adjusted global warming potentials for LCA and carbon footprints , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[7]  Seungdo Kim,et al.  Life cycle assessment of corn grain and corn stover in the United States , 2009 .

[8]  Anoop Singh,et al.  Renewable fuels from algae: an answer to debatable land based fuels. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[9]  Hong Huo,et al.  Methods of dealing with co-products of biofuels in life-cycle analysis and consequent results within the U.S. context , 2011 .

[10]  Michael Q. Wang,et al.  Methane and nitrous oxide emissions affect the life-cycle analysis of algal biofuels , 2012 .

[11]  Ruedi Müller-Wenk,et al.  Climatic impact of land use in LCA—carbon transfers between vegetation/soil and air , 2010 .

[12]  J. Fargione,et al.  The Ecological Impact of Biofuels , 2010 .

[13]  Daniel Sperling,et al.  Low Carbon Fuel Standards: Implementation Scenarios and Challenges , 2010 .

[14]  Andrew D. Jones,et al.  Supporting Online Material for: Ethanol Can Contribute To Energy and Environmental Goals , 2006 .

[15]  A. Monti,et al.  The contribution of switchgrass in reducing GHG emissions , 2012 .

[16]  Francesco Cherubini,et al.  GHG balances of bioenergy systems – Overview of key steps in the production chain and methodological concerns , 2010 .

[17]  André Faaij,et al.  Greenhouse gas footprints of different biofuel production systems , 2010 .

[18]  Simone P. Souza,et al.  Life cycle assessment of sugarcane ethanol and palm oil biodiesel joint production. , 2012 .

[19]  Ben Wu,et al.  Resource demand implications for US algae biofuels production scale-up , 2011 .

[20]  C. Rosen,et al.  Fertilizer Nitrogen Rate Effects on Nutrient Removal by Corn Stover and Cobs , 2013 .

[21]  Jacinto F. Fabiosa,et al.  Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change , 2008, Science.

[22]  Heather L MacLean,et al.  Characterizing model uncertainties in the life cycle of lignocellulose-based ethanol fuels. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[23]  Oliver R. Inderwildi,et al.  Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas analysis for algae-derived biodiesel , 2011 .

[24]  Christian Solli,et al.  Alternative "global warming" metrics in life cycle assessment: a case study with existing transportation data. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[25]  Mark A. White,et al.  Environmental impacts of algae-derived biodiesel and bioelectricity for transportation. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[26]  Joaquim E. A. Seabra,et al.  Life cycle assessment of Brazilian sugarcane products: GHG emissions and energy use , 2011 .

[27]  Mark A. White,et al.  Environmental life cycle comparison of algae to other bioenergy feedstocks. , 2010, Environmental science & technology.

[28]  Douglas J. Reinemann,et al.  Applying life-cycle assessment to low carbon fuel standards--How allocation choices influence carbon intensity for renewable transportation fuels , 2010 .

[29]  Nicholas E. Korres,et al.  Key issues in life cycle assessment of ethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass: Challenges and perspectives. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[30]  Pascal Lesage,et al.  Valuing temporary carbon storage , 2012 .

[31]  Kimberley A Mullins,et al.  Policy implications of uncertainty in modeled life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of biofuels. , 2011, Environmental science & technology.

[32]  Ken E. Giller,et al.  Resource use efficiency and environmental performance of nine major biofuel crops, processed by first-generation conversion techniques , 2010 .

[33]  T. Searchinger,et al.  Land-Use Change Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases , 2008 .

[34]  S. Polasky,et al.  Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt , 2008, Science.

[35]  Humberto Blanco-Canqui,et al.  Energy Crops and Their Implications on Soil and Environment , 2010 .

[36]  D. Batten,et al.  Life cycle assessment of biodiesel production from microalgae in ponds. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[37]  Anders Hammer Strømman,et al.  Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[38]  S. Davis,et al.  Changes in soil organic carbon under biofuel crops , 2008 .

[39]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  LCA of second generation bioethanol: A review and some issues to be resolved for good LCA practice , 2012 .

[40]  N. Pelletier,et al.  An Ecological Economic Critique of the Use of Market Information in Life Cycle Assessment Research , 2011 .

[41]  Philip Owende,et al.  Biofuels from microalgae—A review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products , 2010 .

[42]  F. V. Stappen,et al.  Direct and indirect land use changes issues in European sustainability initiatives: State-of-the-art, open issues and future developments , 2011 .

[43]  C. Howe,et al.  Life-Cycle Assessment of Potential Algal Biodiesel Production in the United Kingdom: A Comparison of Raceways and Air-Lift Tubular Bioreactors , 2010 .