Determinants and performance of the quadruple helix model and the mediating role of civil society

[1]  C. Griffy-Brown,et al.  Technology perceptions, innovations and effects in society: Technology in Society Briefing , 2023, Technology in Society.

[2]  M. Al-Emran,et al.  The role of technology adoption in sustainable development: Overview, opportunities, challenges, and future research agendas , 2023, Technology in Society.

[3]  Mingyue Wang,et al.  The role of government-industry-academia partnership in business incubation: Evidence from new R&D institutions in China , 2022, Technology in Society.

[4]  M. Sarstedt,et al.  PLS-SEM’s most wanted guidance , 2022, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.

[5]  Léo-Paul Dana,et al.  The triple helix in developed countries: when knowledge meets innovation? , 2022, Heliyon.

[6]  M. Jackson,et al.  Social capital I: measurement and associations with economic mobility , 2022, Nature.

[7]  Néstor Vercher.  The Role of Actors in Social Innovation in Rural Areas , 2022, Land.

[8]  Mattia Casula,et al.  How to frame the governance dimension of social innovation: theoretical considerations and empirical evidence , 2022, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research.

[9]  S. Böhm,et al.  The collaborative and contested interplay between business and civil society in circular economy transitions , 2022, Business Strategy and the Environment.

[10]  I. Fazey,et al.  Building community resilience in a context of climate change: The role of social capital , 2022, Ambio.

[11]  A. Abubakar,et al.  Impact of business analytics and π-shaped skills on innovative performance: Findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA , 2022, Technology in Society.

[12]  Domingo García‐Pérez‐de‐Lema,et al.  Systematic Review of The Literature on The Concept of Civil Society in The Quadruple Helix Framework , 2021, Journal of technology management & innovation.

[13]  Yuzhuo Cai,et al.  Triple Helix or Quadruple Helix: Which Model of Innovation to Choose for Empirical Studies? , 2021, Minerva.

[14]  A. Washizu,et al.  Will smart cities enhance the social capital of residents? The importance of smart neighborhood management , 2021 .

[15]  J. Morawska-Jancelewicz.  The Role of Universities in Social Innovation Within Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Model: Practical Implications from Polish Experience , 2021, Journal of the Knowledge Economy.

[16]  Arch G. Woodside,et al.  Fuzzy-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): Guidelines for research practice in Information Systems and marketing , 2021, Int. J. Inf. Manag..

[17]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  The combined use of symmetric and asymmetric approaches: partial least squares-structural equation modeling and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis , 2021 .

[18]  G. Porto,et al.  Cooperation and technological areas in the state universities of São Paulo: An analysis from the perspective of the triple helix model , 2021 .

[19]  Laura Zapata-Cantú,et al.  Challenges for Innovation and Sustainable Development in Latin America: The Significance of Institutions and Human Capital , 2021, Sustainability.

[20]  J. Ntayi,et al.  Citizens’ Behaviour and Compliance in Sub Saharan Africa Local Governments: the Role of Social Capital , 2021, Public Organization Review.

[21]  M. Bellandi,et al.  Social innovation governance and the role of universities: Cases of quadruple helix partnerships in Italy , 2021 .

[22]  B. Gerhart,et al.  The Resource-Based View of the Firm, Human Resources, and Human Capital: Progress and Prospects , 2021 .

[23]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Executing and interpreting applications of PLS-SEM: Updates for family business researchers , 2020 .

[24]  Mehran Badin Dahesh,et al.  Reviewing the intellectual structure and evolution of the innovation systems approach: A social network analysis , 2020 .

[25]  K. Rong,et al.  Exploring regional innovation ecosystems: an empirical study in China , 2020, Industry and Innovation.

[26]  Zongjun Wang,et al.  Configurational differences of national innovation capability: a fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis approach , 2020, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[27]  José Antonio Pedraza-Rodríguez,et al.  From strategies to innovation: an empirical study from Spain , 2020, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[28]  William C. McDowell,et al.  Essential new PLS-SEM analysis methods for your entrepreneurship analytical toolbox , 2020 .

[29]  A. Reid,et al.  Quadruple Helix Models for Sustainable Regional Innovation: Engaging and Facilitating Civil Society Participation , 2020, Economies.

[30]  W. Dhewanto,et al.  Quadruple Helix Approach to Achieve International Product Quality for Indonesian Food SMEs , 2020 .

[31]  Walter Lugo Ruiz Castañeda,et al.  Participación de la sociedad civil en las dinámicas de innovación para el logro de los ODS. Un marco de análisis , 2020 .

[32]  A. Kuzior,et al.  The Quadruple Helix Model as a Smart City Design Principle , 2020, Virtual Economics.

[33]  D. Rehfeld,et al.  Favourable social innovation ecosystem(s)? – An explorative approach , 2020 .

[34]  K. Murphy,et al.  Driving innovation: Public policy and human capital , 2019, Research Policy.

[35]  Dalia Vidickienė,et al.  Unused potential for Smart Specialization development through collaboration: Lithuanian case , 2019, Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika).

[36]  Gabriel Linton,et al.  Quadruple helix as a network of relationships: creating value within a Swedish regional innovation system , 2019, Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship.

[37]  M. Schraudner,et al.  Co-shaping the Future in Quadruple Helix Innovation Systems: Uncovering Public Preferences toward Participatory Research and Innovation , 2019, She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation.

[38]  Sotirios Paroutis,et al.  Understanding Smart Cities: Innovation ecosystems, technological advancements, and societal challenges , 2019, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[39]  P. Faria,et al.  Human capital and innovation: the importance of the optimal organizational task structure , 2019, Research Policy.

[40]  W. Hameed,et al.  Antecedents of Sustainable Social Entrepreneurship Initiatives in Pakistan and Outcomes: Collaboration between Quadruple Helix Sectors , 2018, Sustainability.

[41]  P. Jackson,et al.  National innovation performance: the role of human capital and social capital , 2018, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research.

[42]  M. Mazzucato,et al.  Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunities , 2018, Industrial and Corporate Change.

[43]  Christopher M. Harris,et al.  The emergence of human capital: Roles of social capital and coordination that drive unit performance , 2018, Human Resource Management Journal.

[44]  Thomas Greckhamer,et al.  Studying configurations with qualitative comparative analysis: Best practices in strategy and organization research , 2018, Strategic Organization.

[45]  Sayyed Mohsen Allameh.  Antecedents and consequences of intellectual capital , 2018, Journal of Intellectual Capital.

[46]  Namhyun Kim,et al.  Social capital, knowledge sharing and innovation of small- and medium-sized enterprises in a tourism cluster , 2018, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management.

[47]  A. Trachuk,et al.  Innovation and Performance: An Empirical Study of Russian Industrial Companies , 2018, Emerging Issues and Trends in Innovation and Technology Management.

[48]  James A. Cunningham,et al.  Macro, meso and micro perspectives of technology transfer , 2018 .

[49]  J. Henseler.  Partial least squares path modeling: Quo vadis? , 2018, Quality & Quantity.

[50]  A. Kriz,et al.  Readying a Region: Temporally Exploring the Development of an Australian Regional Quadruple Helix , 2018 .

[51]  Gianluca Elia,et al.  Living Lab as an Approach to Activate Dynamic Innovation Ecosystems and Networks: An Empirical Study , 2017 .

[52]  Maximilian Unger,et al.  The Knowledge Triangle between Research, Education and Innovation – A Conceptual Discussion , 2017 .

[53]  Ricardo Gouveia Rodrigues,et al.  A quadruple helix model of entrepreneurship, innovation and stages of economic development , 2017 .

[54]  J. Knoben,et al.  Human capital and innovation in Sub-Saharan countries: a firm-level study , 2017 .

[55]  S. Law,et al.  Roles of Formal Institutions and Social Capital in Innovation Activities: A Cross-Country Analysis , 2017 .

[56]  Christian Felzensztein,et al.  Proximity as determinant of business cooperation for technological and non-technological innovations: a study of an agribusiness cluster , 2017 .

[57]  Katharina Fellnhofer,et al.  Facilitating entrepreneurial discovery in smart specialisation via stakeholder participation within online mechanisms for knowledge-based policy advice , 2017 .

[58]  Luciana Lazzeretti,et al.  How proximity matters in innovation networks dynamics along the cluster evolution. A study of the high technology applied to cultural goods , 2016 .

[59]  Karl Wennberg,et al.  Why Family Matters: The Impact of Family Resources on Immigrant Entrepreneurs’ Exit from Entrepreneurship , 2016 .

[60]  Mohd Rafi Yaacob,et al.  Perception Towards Factors that Affect the Effectiveness of an Entrepreneurship Training Program , 2016, Journal of Entrepreneurship and Business.

[61]  R. A. Hassan.  Self-efficacy and self-independence in promoting self-employment intention among university students , 2016 .

[62]  Abdul Rahim Anuar,et al.  The Effectiveness of the Entrepreneurship Education Program in Upgrading Entrepreneurial Skills among Public University Students , 2016 .

[63]  Weiwei Song,et al.  Research on Innovation of Science and Technology Investment and Financing of SMEs in Intellectual Property , 2016 .

[64]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: establishing the framework conditions , 2016, The Journal of Technology Transfer.

[65]  D. Archibugi,et al.  The Retreat of Public Research and Its Adverse Consequences on Innovation , 2016 .

[66]  Panos E. Kourouthanassis,et al.  Explaining online shopping behavior with fsQCA: The role of cognitive and affective perceptions , 2016 .

[67]  A. Rodríguez‐Pose,et al.  Networking, Context and Firm-Level Innovation: Cooperation Through the Regional Filter in Norway , 2015 .

[68]  M. Laužikas,et al.  Impacts of social capital on transformation from efficiency to innovation-driven business , 2014 .

[69]  Pilar Marques,et al.  Exploring how social capital facilitates innovation: The role of innovation enablers , 2014 .

[70]  M. Wright,et al.  Entrepreneurial innovation: The importance of context , 2014 .

[71]  P. Ståhle,et al.  Societal innovation at the interface of the state and civil society , 2014 .

[72]  Steven B. Kraines,et al.  Beyond the third mission: Exploring the emerging university function of co-creation for sustainability , 2014 .

[73]  Colin Porlezza,et al.  Innovation in Creative Industries: from the Quadruple Helix Model to the Systems Theory , 2012 .

[74]  Elias G. Carayannis,et al.  Open Innovation Diplomacy and a 21st Century Fractal Research, Education and Innovation (FREIE) Ecosystem: Building on the Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Concepts and the “Mode 3” Knowledge Production System , 2011 .

[75]  M. Frese,et al.  Human capital and entrepreneurial success: A meta-analytical review , 2011 .

[76]  Peer C. Fiss.  Building Better Causal Theories: A Fuzzy Set Approach to Typologies in Organization Research , 2011 .

[77]  Raffaele Filieri,et al.  Investigating the role of social capital in innovation: sparse versus dense network , 2010, J. Knowl. Manag..

[78]  Steven P. MacGregor,et al.  Gauging Readiness for the Quadruple Helix: A Study of 16 European Organizations , 2010 .

[79]  Wynne W. Chin,et al.  A Comparison of Approaches for the Analysis of Interaction Effects Between Latent Variables Using Partial Least Squares Path Modeling , 2010 .

[80]  Robert J. Vandenberg,et al.  12 Structural Equation Modeling in Management Research: A Guide for Improved Analysis , 2009 .

[81]  Wei Zheng.  A Social Capital Perspective of Innovation from Individuals to Nations: Where is Empirical Literature Directing Us? , 2008 .

[82]  Airong Zhang,et al.  Study on Motivation Mechanism of Citizens' Participation under the Conditions of E-government , 2008, 2008 International Conference on Management of e-Commerce and e-Government.

[83]  K. Provan,et al.  Modes of Network Governance: Structure, Management, and Effectiveness , 2007 .

[84]  Diego Lanzi.  Capabilities, human capital and education , 2007 .

[85]  Nuria González-Álvarez,et al.  APPROPRIABILITY OF INNOVATION RESULTS: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY IN SPANISH MANUFACTURING FIRMS , 2007 .

[86]  A. Novy,et al.  Participatory Budgeting in Porto Alegre: Social Innovation and the Dialectical Relationship of State and Civil Society , 2005 .

[87]  Mary Mathew,et al.  Definition Of Innovation Revisited: An Empirical Study On Indian Information Technology Industry , 2005 .

[88]  Daniel Jiménez-Jiménez,et al.  Innovation and human resource management fit: an empirical study , 2005 .

[89]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage , 2004 .

[90]  John de la Mothe,et al.  The institutional governance of technology, society, and innovation , 2004 .

[91]  Mourad Dakhli,et al.  Human capital, social capital, and innovation: a multi-country study , 2004 .

[92]  P. Davidsson,et al.  The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs , 2003 .

[93]  H. Gintis,et al.  Social Capital and Community Governance , 2002 .

[94]  Réjean Landry,et al.  Does social capital determine innovation? To what extent? , 2002 .

[95]  D. Doloreux,et al.  What we should know about regional systems of innovation , 2002 .

[96]  H. Etzkowitz.  Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations , 2002 .

[97]  Andrew A. Toole,et al.  Is Public R&D a Complement or Substitute for Private R&D? A Review of the Econometric Evidence , 2000 .

[98]  S. Ghoshal,et al.  Social Capital and Value Creation: The Role of Intrafirm Networks , 1998 .

[99]  Stephen F. Knack,et al.  Does Social Capital Have an Economic Payoff? A Cross-Country Investigation , 1997 .

[100]  S. Vitell,et al.  Ethics and Social Responsibility in Marketing: An Examination of the Ethical Evaluation of Advertising Strategies , 1997 .

[101]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[102]  B. Budiyanto,et al.  The effect of innovation capability on business performance: The role of social capital and entrepreneurial leadership on SMEs in Indonesia , 2021 .

[103]  Jesús Manuel Palma-Ruiz,et al.  Entrepreneurship in the Solidarity Economy: A Valuation of Models Based on the Quadruple Helix and Civil Society , 2019, Contributions to Management Science.

[104]  Munshi Naser Ibne Afzal,et al.  A panel investigation of the triple helix (TH), quadruple helix (QH) relationship in ASEAN-5 economies , 2018 .

[105]  Marko Sarstedt,et al.  Multigroup Analysis in Partial Least Squares (PLS) Path Modeling: Alternative Methods and Empirical Results , 2011 .

[106]  P. Adler,et al.  Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept , 2002 .

[107]  J. Henseler,et al.  Computational Statistics and Data Analysis Consistent and Asymptotically Normal Pls Estimators for Linear Structural Equations , 2022 .