An analysis of industry capability for the implementation of a software-based compliance approach for the UK Building Regulations 2006

In support of the movement towards the integration of modelling in the building design process, a unified software-based methodology for the demonstration of compliance with energy performance standards was introduced in the UK Building and Approved Inspectors (Amendment) Regulations 2006 (England and Wales). This paper reports the conclusions drawn from a longitudinal two-stage industry survey undertaken at key implementation stages of the methodology to gauge industry adaptability in accommodating the new requirements followed by subsequent in-depth interviews with relevant professionals to explore the challenges associated with application and enforcement. Key findings include shortcomings in the technical capabilities of accredited software, the quantification of the effect of their shortcomings on user assessment of the methodology and the lack of clarity and consistency of enforcement. Practical application: This work provides an analysis of the adaptive capability of the UK construction industry in accommodating integrated energy performance modelling as a legislative requirement associated with performance based standards. The analysis of firsthand feedback from practitioners involved in the implementation of the new regulatory requirements provides both an overview of key industry indicators and detailed insights into the practical implementation and enforcement of the methodology, the feedback of which is used to establish future priorities and improvements for future regulatory revisions.

[1]  J. Creswell Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five traditions. , 1998 .

[2]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[3]  Jlm Jan Hensen,et al.  Simulation tools for building energy design , 2004 .

[4]  Bilal M. Ayyub,et al.  Probability, Statistics, and Reliability for Engineers and Scientists , 2003 .

[5]  Patrick Dattalo,et al.  Determining Sample Size , 2008 .

[6]  Jon A. Krosnick,et al.  An introduction to survey research, polling, and data analysis , 1996 .

[7]  Erniel B. Barrios,et al.  Estimation Under Purposive Sampling , 2006 .

[8]  Joseph Andrew Clarke,et al.  A CO-OPERATING SOLVER APPROACH TO BUILDING SIMULATION , 2004 .

[9]  Nigel King,et al.  The qualitative research interview , 1994 .

[10]  Neveen Hamza,et al.  Energy conservation regulations: Impacts on design and procurement of low energy buildings , 2009 .

[11]  Maria Dolores C. Tongco,et al.  Purposive Sampling as a Tool for Informant Selection , 2007 .

[12]  A. Mahdavi,et al.  AN INQUIRY INTO THE BUILDING PERFORMANCE SIMULATION TOOLS USAGE BY ARCHITECTS IN AUSTRIA , 2003 .

[13]  Dennis L. Loveday,et al.  Towards the efficient use of simulation in building performance analysis: a user survey , 2003 .

[14]  Jon Hand,et al.  CONTRASTING THE CAPABILITIES OF BUILDING ENERGY PERFORMANCE SIMULATION PROGRAMS , 2008 .

[15]  Marta Rocha Camargo,et al.  A grounded theory study of the relationship between e-mail and burnout , 2008, Inf. Res..

[16]  Graham R. Gibbs,et al.  Analyzing Qualitative Data , 2014 .

[17]  Floyd J. Fowler,et al.  Survey Research Methods , 1984 .

[18]  William M. K. Trochim,et al.  Research methods knowledge base , 2001 .

[19]  James E. Bartlett,et al.  Organizational research: Determining appropriate sample size in survey research , 2001 .

[20]  Komalsingh Rambaree,et al.  Bringing Rigour in Qualitative Social Research: The Use of a CAQDAS , 2007 .

[21]  Patrick Dattalo,et al.  Determining Sample Size: Balancing Power, Precision, and Practicality , 2007 .

[22]  Luis Pérez-Lombard,et al.  A review on buildings energy consumption information , 2008 .

[23]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[24]  Tim Rapley,et al.  Doing Conversation, Discourse and Document Analysis , 2008 .