Efficacy, Safety, and Cost-Minimization Analysis of Continuous Infusion of Low-Dose Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin in Patients With Unresectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma

Background Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is rare and aggressive neoplasia, with a poor prognosis; furthermore, the monetary cost of its treatment represents a major challenge for many patients. The economic burden this malignancy imposes is underscored by the fact that asbestos exposure, which is the most frequent risk factor, is much more prevalent in the lower socioeconomic population of developing countries. The aims of the present study were to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cost of continuous infusion of low-dose Gemcitabine plus Cisplatin (CIGC) as a treatment strategy for patients with unresectable MPM. Methods We performed a prospective cohort study to determine efficacy and safety of continuous infusion gemcitabine at a dose of 250 mg/m2 in a 6-h continuous infusion plus cisplatin 35 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle in patients with unresectable MPM. We also performed a cost-minimization analysis to determine if this chemotherapy regimen is less expensive than other currently used regimens. Results The median number of chemotherapy cycles was six (range 1–11 cycles); objective response rate was documented in 46.2%, and disease control rate was seen in 81.2%. Median PFS was 8.05 months (CI 95% 6.97–9.13); median OS was 16.16 months (CI 95% 12.5–19.9). The cost minimization analysis revealed savings of 66.4, 61.9, and 97.7% comparing CIGC with short-infusion gemcitabine plus cisplatin (SIGC), cisplatin plus pemetrexed (CP), and cisplatin plus pemetrexed and bevacizumab (CPB), respectively. Furthermore, this chemotherapy regimen proved to be safe at the administered dosage. Conclusion CIGC is an effective and safe treatment option for patients with unresectable MPM; besides, this combination is a cost-saving option when compared with other frequently used chemotherapy schemes. Therefore, this treatment scheme should be strongly considered for patients with unresectable MPM and limited economic resources.

[1]  A. Mansfield,et al.  First-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (CheckMate 743): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial , 2021, The Lancet.

[2]  J. Aerts,et al.  Emerging Treatments for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Where Are We Heading? , 2020, Frontiers in Oncology.

[3]  L. Crinò,et al.  Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: State-of-the-Art on Current Therapies and Promises for the Future , 2020, Frontiers in Oncology.

[4]  E. Borrelli,et al.  Costs of medical care for mesothelioma , 2019, Rare tumors.

[5]  K. Rosenzweig,et al.  Current and Future Management of Malignant Mesothelioma: A Consensus Report from the National Cancer Institute Thoracic Malignancy Steering Committee, International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, and Mesothelioma Applied Research Foundation , 2018, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[6]  P. Demers,et al.  The economic burden of lung cancer and mesothelioma due to occupational and para-occupational asbestos exposure , 2017, Occupational and Environmental Medicine.

[7]  Nick A Maskell,et al.  Malignant pleural mesothelioma: an update on investigation, diagnosis and treatment , 2016, European Respiratory Review.

[8]  N. Rahman,et al.  Modern Management of Malignant Pleural Effusions , 2016 .

[9]  E. Yorke,et al.  Phase II Study of Hemithoracic Intensity-Modulated Pleural Radiation Therapy (IMPRINT) As Part of Lung-Sparing Multimodality Therapy in Patients With Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  R. Lemen Mesothelioma from asbestos exposures: Epidemiologic patterns and impact in the United States , 2016, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part B, Critical reviews.

[11]  D. Ettinger,et al.  NCCN Guidelines Insights: Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma, Version 3.2016. , 2016, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[12]  B. Milleron,et al.  Bevacizumab for newly diagnosed pleural mesothelioma in the Mesothelioma Avastin Cisplatin Pemetrexed Study (MAPS): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial , 2016, The Lancet.

[13]  O. Arrieta,et al.  A phase II trial of prolonged, continuous infusion of low-dose gemcitabine plus cisplatin in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma , 2014, Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology.

[14]  M. Drummond,et al.  Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force. , 2013, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[15]  E. Yorke,et al.  Pleural intensity-modulated radiotherapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  S. Armato,et al.  Multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase II trial of gemcitabine/cisplatin plus bevacizumab or placebo in patients with malignant mesothelioma. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  M. Rajer,et al.  A phase II trial of low-dose gemcitabine in a prolonged infusion and cisplatin for malignant pleural mesothelioma , 2012, Anti-cancer drugs.

[18]  I. Alvarado-Cabrero,et al.  Case-control study of pleural mesothelioma in workers with social security in Mexico. , 2009, American journal of industrial medicine.

[19]  A. Bezjak,et al.  The Management of Thymoma: A Systematic Review and Practice Guideline , 2009, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[20]  C. Obasaju,et al.  Multicenter phase II trial of neoadjuvant pemetrexed plus cisplatin followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy and radiation for malignant pleural mesothelioma. , 2009, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[21]  X. Badia,et al.  Can the Spanish care system assume the new costs of medications against cancer? , 2008, Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico.

[22]  E. Borden,et al.  Gemcitabine and cisplatin in unresectable malignant mesothelioma of the pleura: a phase II study of the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG 9810). , 2008, Lung cancer.

[23]  A. Davies,et al.  The Use of Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Systematic Review and Practice Guideline , 2006, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[24]  B. Robinson,et al.  Advances in malignant mesothelioma. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[25]  G. Giaccone,et al.  Randomized phase III study of cisplatin with or without raltitrexed in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: an intergroup study of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Lung Cancer Group and the National Cancer Institute of Canada. , 2005, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[26]  S. Bretti,et al.  Cisplatin and Gemcitabine in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A Phase II Study , 2005, American journal of clinical oncology.

[27]  D. Maziak,et al.  Surgical management of malignant pleural mesothelioma: a systematic review and evidence summary. , 2005, Lung cancer.

[28]  M. Johnston,et al.  The treatment of lymphedema related to breast cancer: a systematic review and evidence summary , 2004, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[29]  M. Byrne,et al.  Modified RECIST criteria for assessment of response in malignant pleural mesothelioma. , 2004, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[30]  U. Gatzemeier,et al.  Phase III study of pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin versus cisplatin alone in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[31]  D. Fielding,et al.  A multicentre phase II study of cisplatin and gemcitabine for malignant mesothelioma , 2002, British Journal of Cancer.

[32]  P. Fayers Interpreting quality of life data: population-based reference data for the EORTC QLQ-C30. , 2001, European journal of cancer.

[33]  J. Herndon,et al.  Factors predictive of survival among 337 patients with mesothelioma treated between 1984 and 1994 by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B. , 1998, Chest.

[34]  H. Niitani,et al.  [Phase II study]. , 1995, Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy.

[35]  A. Ardizzoni,et al.  Chemotherapy treatment in malignant pleural mesothelioma: a difficult history. , 2018, Journal of thoracic disease.

[36]  J. Álvarez Evaluación económica de medicamentos y tecnologías sanitarias , 2012 .

[37]  A. Smala,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of pemetrexed plus cisplatin: malignant pleural mesothelioma treatment in UK clinical practice. , 2008, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[38]  James J. Rusthoven,et al.  Measuring quality of life in patients with pleural mesothelioma using a modified version of the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (LCSS): psychometric properties of the LCSS-Meso , 2005, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[39]  A. Ceribelli,et al.  Prolonged infusion gemcitabine: a clinical phase I study at low- (300 mg/m2) and high-dose (875 mg/m2) levels , 2004, Investigational New Drugs.

[40]  A. Musk,et al.  Cisplatin and gemcitabine treatment for malignant mesothelioma: a phase II study. , 1999, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[41]  G. Giaccone,et al.  Prognostic factors in patients with pleural mesothelioma: the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer experience. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[42]  G. Giaccone,et al.  The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer experience with teniposide: preliminary results of a randomized study in non-small cell lung cancer. , 1992, Seminars in oncology.