Transient-Evoked and 2F1-F2 Distortion Product Oto-Acoustic Emissions in Dogs:Preliminary Findings

Transient (click)-evoked oto-acoustic emissions (TEOAEs) and distortion product oto-acoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were recorded in a feasibility study in 7 healthy mixed-breed dogs using the ILO 92 OAE analyser (Otodynamics, Hartfield, UK). Five dogs were found to have normal hearing in both ears and 2 dogs in the left ear only following otoscopy, tympanometry and auditory brainstem response audiometry. Twelve sets of TEOAEs (click-evoked) to 80 dB peSPL click stimulus and 9 sets of DPOAEs (2F1-F2) to 8 different stimulus levels of the primary tones (L1/L2) were collected at 11 test frequencies (F2) in these normal-hearing dogs. TEOAEs were successfully recorded in 11 of the 12 ears using the default user setting and in all 12 ears using the quickscreen program. DPOAEs were successfully recorded in all 9 ears tested. While the TEOAEs parameters matched those for humans, the average signal-to-noise ratio of DPOAEs was considerably higher in the dogs. Stimulus levels at 55/55, 55/45 and 55/35 dB SPL were demonstrated to produce DPOAEs that seem to reflect the active dynamic status of the outer hair cell system. Postmortem DPOAEs at these stimulus levels and TEOAEs at 80 Db peSPL could not be elicited 5 min following euthanasia of dogs. However, DPOAEs could still be recorded albeit with reduced amplitude at stimulus levels where L1 > 55 dB SPL. The results suggest that TEOAEs and DPOAEs in dogs have the potential to provide valuable insights into their mechanisms of generation, and the specific role and behaviour of outer hair cells of the cochlea in certain pathological conditions, particularly in drug-induced ototoxicity, in humans.

[1]  R Probst,et al.  A review of otoacoustic emissions. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  B L Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  The Clinical Utility of Distortion‐Product Otoacoustic Emissions , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[3]  B. Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  Altered susceptibility of 2f 1—f 2 acoustic-distortion products to the effects of repeated noise exposure in rabbits , 1991, Hearing Research.

[4]  J. P. Wilson,et al.  Model for cochlear echoes and tinnitus based on an observed electrical correlate , 1980, Hearing Research.

[5]  K. Munro,et al.  Investigation of hearing impairment in Cavalier King Charles spaniels using auditory brainstem response audiometry. , 1997, The Journal of small animal practice.

[6]  D. Kemp Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. , 1978, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  G. K. Martin,et al.  Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions in a nonhuman primate. I. Basic features and relations to other emissions , 1988, Hearing Research.

[8]  M. J. McCoy,et al.  Otoacoustic emissions in otologic practice , 1994 .

[9]  P Bray,et al.  An advanced cochlear echo technique suitable for infant screening. , 1987, British journal of audiology.

[10]  H. Wit,et al.  Frequency analysis of stimulated cochlear acoustic emissions in monkey ears , 1982, Hearing Research.

[11]  W. W. Clark,et al.  The behavior of acoustic distortion products in the ear canals of chinchillas with normal or damaged ears. , 1982, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  D A Nelson,et al.  Distortion-product emissions and auditory sensitivity in human ears with normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[13]  M. Whitehead,et al.  Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in normal and impaired ears: insight into generation processes. , 1993, Progress in brain research.

[14]  P. Bonfils,et al.  Clinical Applications of Evoked Acoustic Emissions: Results in Normally Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Subjects , 1989, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[15]  P. Avan,et al.  Evoked otoacoustic emissions in guinea pig: Basic characteristics , 1990, Hearing Research.

[16]  H. Sohmer,et al.  Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions can be recorded in the rat , 1996, Hearing Research.

[17]  E. Rubel,et al.  Development of otoacoustic emissions in gerbil: Evidence for micromechanical changes underlying development of the place code , 1991, Hearing Research.

[18]  B. Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. I. Basic features and physiological vulnerability , 1987, Hearing Research.

[19]  B L Lonsbury-Martin,et al.  Acoustic distortion products in humans: systematic changes in amplitudes as a function of f2/f1 ratio. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  M. Whitehead,et al.  Actively and Passively Generated Acoustic Distortion at 2f1-f2 in Rabbits , 1990 .

[21]  M. Whitehead,et al.  Relevance of Animal Models to the Clinical Application of Otoacoustic Emissions , 1992 .

[22]  A. M. Brown,et al.  Acoustic distortion from rodent ears: A comparison of responses from rats, guinea pigs and gerbils , 1987, Hearing Research.

[24]  The effect of furosemide on evoked otoacoustic emissions in guinea pigs , 1992, Hearing Research.

[25]  R Probst,et al.  Reporting click-evoked and distortion-product otoacoustic emission results with respect to the pure-tone audiogram. , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[26]  M. Furst,et al.  Characteristics of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions in ears with normal hearing and with noise-induced hearing loss. , 1993, British journal of audiology.

[27]  R. Salvi,et al.  Effects of kainic acid on the cochlear potentials and distortion product otoacoustic emissions in chinchilla , 1996, Hearing Research.

[28]  William E. Brownell,et al.  Outer Hair Cell Electromotility and Otoacoustic Emissions , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[29]  Edwin W Rubel,et al.  Variation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions with furosemide injection , 1994, Hearing Research.

[30]  P. Avan,et al.  Transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and high-frequency acoustic trauma in the guinea pig. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  Martin S. Robinette Clinical Observations with Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions with Adults , 1992 .

[32]  F. Harris Distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans with high frequency sensorineural hearing loss. , 1990, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[33]  David T. Kemp,et al.  The Use of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions in Neonatal Hearing Screening Programs , 1993 .