Méthodes et évolution de la certification de sites de santé sur le Web à travers l’expérience du HONcode

Today, the Web is a media with increasing pervasiveness around the world. Its use is constantly growing and the medical field is no exception. According to the Pew Internet & American Life Project, 80% of Internet users have searched for American medical information in 2006. However, the problem is no longer about finding information but assessing the credibility of the publishers as well as the relevance and accuracy of the documents retrieved from the web. This problem is particularly relevant in the medical area which has a direct impact on the well-being of citizens and in the Web 2.0 context where information publishing is easier than ever. To address the quality of the medical Internet, the HONcode certification proposed by the Health On the Net Foundation (HON) is certainly the most successful initiative. The aims of this paper are to present certification activity through the HONcode experience and to show that certification is more complex than a simple code of conduct. Therefore, we first present the HONcode, its application and its current evolutions. Following that, we give some quantitative results and describe how the final user can access the certified information.

[1]  Natalia Grabar,et al.  Machine Learning Approach for Automatic Quality Criteria Detection of Health Web Pages , 2007, MedInfo.

[2]  Tony Sheldon Trust mark launched as a guarantee of safety in the Netherlands , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  William R. Hersh,et al.  Filtering Web pages for quality indicators: an empirical approach to finding high quality consumer health information on the World Wide Web , 1999, AMIA.

[4]  Gerard Salton,et al.  Research and Development in Information Retrieval , 1982, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[5]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  The PageRank Citation Ranking : Bringing Order to the Web , 1999, WWW 1999.

[6]  Yindalon Aphinyanagphongs,et al.  Text Categorization Models for Identifying Unproven Cancer Treatments on the Web , 2007, MedInfo.

[7]  J E Backus,et al.  MEDLINEplus: building and maintaining the National Library of Medicine's consumer health Web service. , 2000, Bulletin of the Medical Library Association.

[8]  Petra Wilson,et al.  How to find the good and avoid the bad or ugly: a short guide to tools for rating quality of health information on the internet. , 2002, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[9]  Ahmad Risk,et al.  Review Of Internet Health Information Quality Initiatives , 2001, Journal of medical Internet research.

[10]  Natalia Grabar,et al.  Automatic Retrieval of Web Pages with Standards of Ethics and Trustworthiness Within a Medical Portal: What a Page Name Tells Us , 2007, AIME.

[11]  Stéfan Jacques Darmoni,et al.  CISMeF: Cataloque and Index of French speaking health resources , 1999, MIE.

[12]  Loren G. Terveen,et al.  Does “authority” mean quality? predicting expert quality ratings of Web documents , 2000, SIGIR '00.