Geospatial tool-chains: Planning support systems for organisational teams

In practice, most planners do not make significant use of planning support systems. Although extensive research has been conducted, the focus tends to be on supporting individual tasks, and the outcomes are often the development of new stand-alone tools that are difficult to integrate into existing workflows. The knowledge contribution in this article focuses on developing a novel spatial decision support framework focusing on the workflows and tool-chains that span across different teams with varying skill sets and objectives, within an organisation. In the proposed framework, the core decision-making process uses a set of decision parameters that are combined using a weighted decision tree. The framework is evaluated by developing and testing a workflow and GIS tool-chain for a real-world case study of land suitability and mixed-use potentiality analysis.

[1]  Michael Batty,et al.  Planning support systems and the new logic of computation , 1995 .

[2]  R. Klosterman Planning Support Systems: A New Perspective on Computer-Aided Planning , 1997 .

[3]  Stan Geertman,et al.  Participatory Planning and GIS: A PSS to Bridge the Gap , 2002 .

[4]  J. Stillwell,et al.  Interactive Support Systems for Participatory Planning , 2003 .

[5]  Stan C. M. Geertman,et al.  Planning support systems: an inventory of current practice , 2004, Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..

[6]  P. Olszewski,et al.  Using Equivalent Walking Distance to Assess Pedestrian Accessibility to Transit Stations in Singapore , 2005 .

[7]  Guido Antonius Vonk,et al.  Improving Planning Support : The use of planning support systems for spatial planning , 2006 .

[8]  Paul Schot,et al.  Usage of Planning Support Systems , 2006 .

[9]  B. Hakim Sustainable Urbanism: Urban design with nature , 2010 .

[10]  Ron Janssen,et al.  Spatial decision support for collaborative land use planning workshops , 2012 .

[11]  Fred Toppen,et al.  Introduction to ‘Planning Support Systems for Sustainable Urban Development’ , 2013 .

[12]  Michael A.B. van Eggermond,et al.  The role of location in residential location choice models: a review of literature , 2014 .

[13]  Yi Zhu,et al.  Data Integration to Create Large-Scale Spatially Detailed Synthetic Populations , 2015 .

[14]  A. Erath Modelling for Walkability: understanding pedestrians’ preferences in Singapore , 2015 .

[15]  Gustavo A. Arciniegas,et al.  Planning Support Systems and Task-Technology Fit: a Comparative Case Study , 2015 .

[16]  M. C. Schilder,et al.  Planning support systems in urban development in the Netherlands , 2016 .

[17]  Hannah Badland,et al.  Improving planning analysis and decision making: The development and application of a Walkability Planning Support System , 2018 .

[18]  Pradeep Janssen Patrick and Stouffs Rudi Alva A Spatial Decision Support Framework For Planning - Creating Tool-Chains for Organisational Teams , 2019 .

[19]  Andrew Heumann,et al.  Humanizing Architectural Automation: A Case Study in Office Layouts , 2019, Impact: Design With All Senses.

[20]  S. Marshall,et al.  Digital participation – taking 'planning' into the third dimension , 2019 .

[21]  Michael B. Teitz Planning support methods: Urban and regional analysis and projection , 2020 .