Towards optimal user involvement in innovation processes: A panel-centered Living Lab-approach

Living Labs as seen as a rather new research area with only a limited amount of supporting theories for understanding this concept. The absence of supporting theories, or rather the lack of agreement regarding the supporting theories has induced on the one hand a proliferation of papers and articles on Living Labs and on the other hand a wide variety of approaches and projects carried out under the Living Labs-umbrella. In short, on a theoretical as well as on a practical level, a further narrowing and specifying of the Living Lab-concept remains a task in progress. Within this research paper, we will show that the Living Lab-approach is in many ways a logical extension of some of the principles of the Open Innovation-concept. In order to aid to the concrete conceptualization of Living Labs, we will give an overview of history of the Living Lab-concept with a focus on characteristics and applications. This allows us to make a meta-analysis of discerning elements that, according to the most recent literature, should or should not be present in best practice Living Labs-research. Based on this meta-analysis and on the literature review, we will construct a modified consensus-definition of the Living Lab-concept as it is currently understood, described and practiced. By adding the `panel-centered' characteristic, we also add a Living Lab-characteristic that remained overlooked in most literature on Living Labs that however bears a large potential in terms of sustainability and added value of Living Labs.

[1]  D. Edge,et al.  The social shaping of technology , 1988 .

[2]  Marc van Lieshout,et al.  User‐led, citizen innovation at the interface of services , 2009 .

[3]  Lieven De Marez,et al.  A living lab research approach for mobile TV , 2009, EuroITV '09.

[4]  P. Trott,et al.  WHY 'OPEN INNOVATION' IS OLD WINE IN NEW BOTTLES , 2009, International Journal of Innovation Management.

[5]  Pieter Ballon,et al.  Fostering Innovation in Networked Communications: Test and Experimentation Platforms for Broadband Systems , 2007 .

[6]  Karl A. Hribernik,et al.  Living labs as a multi-contextual R&D methodology , 2006, 2006 IEEE International Technology Management Conference (ICE).

[7]  S. Hyysalo Social Learning in Technological Innovation: Experimenting with Information and Communication Technologies , 2005 .

[8]  Nathan,et al.  The influence of market demand upon innovation: A critical review of some recent empirical studies , 1993 .

[9]  Dominik Mahr,et al.  Innovation with Living Labs : a conceptualization of learning from user experiences , 2011 .

[10]  Pelle Ehn,et al.  Work-oriented design of computer artifacts , 1989 .

[11]  Leslie Haddon,et al.  Design and the domestication of information and communication technologies: technical change and everyday life , 1996 .

[12]  Esteve Almirall,et al.  Innovation : A question of Fit – The Living Labs approach , 2009 .

[13]  Anna Ståhlbröst,et al.  FormIT : an approach to user involvement , 2008 .

[14]  D. McDowell Foreword , 1999 .

[15]  Jo Pierson,et al.  Configuring Living Labs For A ‘Thick’ Understanding Of Innovation , 2005 .

[16]  Asbjørn Følstad,et al.  Living Labs for Innovation and Development of Information and Communication Technology: A Literature Review , 2008 .

[17]  Kent Larson,et al.  A living laboratory for the design and evaluation of ubiquitous computing technologies , 2005, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[18]  Petra Turkama Nordic Network of User-Driven Innovation and Livinglabbing , 2010 .

[19]  P. Duin,et al.  The evolution of innovation management towards contextual innovation , 2008 .

[20]  Dimitri Schuurman,et al.  USER-CENTERED INNOVATION: TOWARDS A CONCEPTUAL INTEGRATION OF LEAD USERS AND LIVING LABS , 2009 .