Examination of the use of fuzzy sets to describe relative speed perception

In recent years a range of new methods have been proposed with which to describe and evaluate driver behaviour. One such method is that of fuzzy logic, where variables used in the driver decision-making process may be described linguistically, allowing a quantifiable degree of uncertainty to be introduced. This paper explores the use of such a formalism to describe the driver perception of ‘closing speed’ between two vehicles engaged in ‘car-following’ on a motorway, and by using data from an instrumented vehicle experiment, it tests a number of models using relative speed, visual angle and the time to collision. Several of these models fit the data quite well, and there is both a small positive perception bias present and a number of reversals in sign judgement. Additionally, a brief examination is made of potential variations on the methodology that may both make data collection easier and/or allow a ‘more fuzzy’ representation to be made.

[1]  D. Gazis,et al.  Nonlinear Follow-the-Leader Models of Traffic Flow , 1961 .

[2]  Paul L. Olson,et al.  Driver judgments of relative car velocities. , 1961 .

[3]  Charles A. Baker,et al.  Perceived Movement in Depth as a Function of Luminance and Velocity , 1961 .

[4]  C A BAKER,et al.  Perceived Movement in Depth as a Function of Stimulus Size , 1962, Human factors.

[5]  R. M. Michaels,et al.  Perceptual Factors in Car-Following , 1963 .

[6]  Ernest Peter Todosiev,et al.  The action point model of the driver-vehicle system / , 1963 .

[7]  Leonard Evans,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL MEASUREMENTS OF PERCEPTUAL THRESHOLDS IN CAR-FOLLOWING , 1973 .

[8]  T. Saaty Measuring the Fuzziness of Sets , 1974 .

[9]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[10]  Leonard Evans,et al.  Perceptual Thresholds in Car-Following---A Comparison of Recent Measurements with Earlier Results , 1977 .

[11]  D. C. Rubin On measuring fuzziness: a comment on "A fuzzy set approach to modifiers and vagueness in natural language". , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[12]  Jean-Michel Hoc,et al.  Subsequent verbalization in the study of cognitive processes , 1981 .

[13]  U Kramer,et al.  A model of driver behaviour. , 1982, Ergonomics.

[14]  W Leutzbach,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND APPLICATIONS OF TRAFFIC SIMULATION MODELS AT THE KARLSRUHE INSTITUT FUR VERKEHRWESEN , 1986 .

[15]  I. B. Turksen,et al.  Measurement of Membership Functions , 1986 .

[16]  B. Kosko Fuzziness vs. probability , 1990 .

[17]  Waldemar Karwowski,et al.  Complexity, fuzziness, and ergonomic incompatibility issues in the control of dynamic work environments , 1991 .

[18]  Haris N. Koutsopoulos,et al.  APPROXIMATE REASONING MODELS FOR ROUTE CHOICE BEHAVIOR IN THE PRESENCE OF INFORMATION , 1993 .

[19]  Partha Chakroborty,et al.  MODELING OF DRIVER ANXIETY DURING SIGNAL CHANGE INTERVALS , 1993 .

[20]  R. Mortimer,et al.  Drivers' estimates of time to collision. , 1994, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[21]  Jianping Wu,et al.  Development of a fuzzy logic based microscopic motorway simulation model , 1997, Proceedings of Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[22]  Beshr Sultan,et al.  Dynamic Behavioral Data Collection Using an Instrumented Vehicle , 1999 .

[23]  A. Caramazza,et al.  A Fuzzy Set Approach to Modifiers and Vagueness in Natural Language , 2005 .