Multiple Determinants Direct the Orientation of Signal–Anchor Proteins: The Topogenic Role of the Hydrophobic Signal Domain

The orientation of signal–anchor proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane is largely determined by the charged residues flanking the apolar, membrane-spanning domain and is influenced by the folding properties of the NH2-terminal sequence. However, these features are not generally sufficient to ensure a unique topology. The topogenic role of the hydrophobic signal domain was studied in vivo by expressing mutants of the asialoglycoprotein receptor subunit H1 in COS-7 cells. By replacing the 19-residue transmembrane segment of wild-type and mutant H1 by stretches of 7–25 leucine residues, we found that the length and hydrophobicity of the apolar sequence significantly affected protein orientation. Translocation of the NH2 terminus was favored by long, hydrophobic sequences and translocation of the COOH terminus by short ones. The topogenic contributions of the transmembrane domain, the flanking charges, and a hydrophilic NH2-terminal portion were additive. In combination these determinants were sufficient to achieve unique membrane insertion in either orientation.

[1]  G von Heijne,et al.  The COOH-terminal ends of internal signal and signal-anchor sequences are positioned differently in the ER translocase , 1994, Journal of Cell Biology.

[2]  G. Heijne.  The distribution of positively charged residues in bacterial inner membrane proteins correlates with the trans‐membrane topology , 1986, The EMBO journal.

[3]  G. Vonheijne,et al.  Control of topology and mode of assembly of a polytopic membrane protein by positively charged residues , 1989, Nature.

[4]  W. Rutter,et al.  Replacement of insulin receptor tyrosine residues 1162 and 1163 compromises insulin-stimulated kinase activity and uptake of 2-deoxyglucose , 1986, Cell.

[5]  M. Spiess,et al.  Heads or tails — what determines the orientation of proteins in the membrane , 1995, FEBS letters.

[6]  G. Heijne,et al.  Membrane proteins: from sequence to structure. , 1994, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[7]  B. Jungnickel,et al.  Signal sequence-dependent function of the TRAM protein during early phases of protein transport across the endoplasmic reticulum membrane , 1996, The Journal of cell biology.

[8]  G. Parks.  Differential Effects of Changes in the Length of a Signal/Anchor Domain on Membrane Insertion, Subunit Assembly, and Intracellular Transport of a Type II Integral Membrane Protein (*) , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[9]  M. Spiess,et al.  Transmembrane orientation of signal‐anchor proteins is affected by the folding state but not the size of the N‐terminal domain. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[10]  H. Lodish,et al.  An internal signal sequence: The asialoglycoprotein receptor membrane anchor , 1986, Cell.

[11]  R. Lamb,et al.  Topology of eukaryotic type II membrane proteins: Importance of N-terminal positively charged residues flanking the hydrophobic domain , 1991, Cell.

[12]  S. Munro,et al.  An investigation of the role of transmembrane domains in Golgi protein retention. , 1995, The EMBO journal.

[13]  J. Wahlberg,et al.  trans-Golgi retention of a plasma membrane protein: mutations in the cytoplasmic domain of the asialoglycoprotein receptor subunit H1 result in trans-Golgi retention , 1995, The Journal of cell biology.

[14]  R. Dalbey.  Positively charged residues are important determinants of membrane protein topology. , 1990, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[15]  K. Mihara,et al.  The amino‐terminal structures that determine topological orientation of cytochrome P‐450 in microsomal membrane. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[16]  B. Cullen.  Use of eukaryotic expression technology in the functional analysis of cloned genes. , 1987, Methods in enzymology.

[17]  H. Lodish,et al.  Sequence of human asialoglycoprotein receptor cDNA. An internal signal sequence for membrane insertion. , 1985, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[18]  K. Mihara,et al.  Functions of signal and signal-anchor sequences are determined by the balance between the hydrophobic segment and the N-terminal charge. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  M. Spiess,et al.  Deletion analysis of the internal signal‐anchor domain of the human asialoglycoprotein receptor H1. , 1987, The EMBO journal.

[20]  R. Doolittle,et al.  A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  G. Kreibich,et al.  Signals for the incorporation and orientation of cytochrome P450 in the endoplasmic reticulum membrane , 1988, The Journal of cell biology.

[22]  D. Andrews,et al.  The role of the N region in signal sequence and signal-anchor function. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[23]  E. Szczesna-Skorupa,et al.  NH2-terminal substitutions of basic amino acids induce translocation across the microsomal membrane and glycosylation of rabbit cytochrome P450IIC2 , 1989, The Journal of cell biology.

[24]  G von Heijne,et al.  Membrane proteins: from sequence to structure. , 1990, Protein engineering.

[25]  J. Beltzer,et al.  Charged residues are major determinants of the transmembrane orientation of a signal-anchor sequence. , 1991, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[26]  G. von Heijne,et al.  Topogenic signals in integral membrane proteins. , 1988, European journal of biochemistry.

[27]  T A Rapoport,et al.  Predicting the orientation of eukaryotic membrane-spanning proteins. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  P. Walter,et al.  Signal sequence recognition and protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. , 1994, Annual review of cell biology.

[29]  D. Mead,et al.  Positive charges at the NH2 terminus convert the membrane-anchor signal peptide of cytochrome P-450 to a secretory signal peptide. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  G. Blobel,et al.  Translocation of secretory proteins across the microsomal membrane occurs through an environment accessible to aqueous perturbants , 1985, Cell.

[31]  R. Lamb,et al.  Role of NH2-terminal positively charged residues in establishing membrane protein topology. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[32]  M. Spiess,et al.  Deletion of the amino-terminal domain of asialoglycoprotein receptor H1 allows cleavage of the internal signal sequence. , 1988, The Journal of biological chemistry.