Project Performance and the Enabling Role of Information Technology: An Exploratory Study on the Role of Alignment

As firms focus on new product, process, and service innovations, improving the performance and productivity of projects that help deliver these innovations assumes greater importance. Information technology (IT) has been an enabler of manufacturing productivity improvement, but its effect on improving the productivity of innovation-intensive operational activities has been mixed. In this paper, we explore the pathways through which IT impacts project-level performance measured in terms of speed, quality, and cost. Specifically, in this exploratory study we seek to present a theory of how the fit between enabling IT and the core characteristics of the project impacts project performance. We test our research hypotheses empirically, using a relatively large, cross-sectional sample of project data. The central contribution is the development and testing of a research model to improve our understanding of the relationship between enabling IT-project alignment, project competencies, and project performance. In doing so, our study clarifies the role of information technologies in project management, providing insights into how to integrate IT into innovation-intensive operational activities for improving project execution competence and productivity.

[1]  David Robertson,et al.  Product development performance: Strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry , 1992 .

[2]  Charles H. Kriebel,et al.  Information Technologies and Business Value: An Analytic and Empirical Investigation , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  S. Thomke,et al.  Agile Product Development: Managing Development Flexibility in Uncertain Environments , 1998 .

[4]  W. Stephenson.  The study of behavior : Q-technique and its methodology , 1955 .

[5]  Peter T. Ward,et al.  Fit, Flexibility and Performance in Manufacturing: Coping with Dynamic Environments , 2004 .

[6]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  One Size Does Not Fit All Projects: Exploring Classical Contingency Domains , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[7]  M. Levine.  Canonical Analysis and Factor Comparison , 1977 .

[8]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  New service development competence in retail banking: Construct development and measurement validation , 2007 .

[9]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  On Uncertainty, Ambiguity, and Complexity in Project Management , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[10]  Ram Narasimhan,et al.  Process-technology fit and its implications for manufacturing performance , 2001 .

[11]  Cheryl Gaimon,et al.  The Creation of Output and Quality in Services: A Framework to Analyze Information Technology‐Worker Systems , 2004 .

[12]  Dale Goodhue,et al.  What Happens After ERP Implementation: Understanding the Impact of Interdependence and Differentiation on Plant-Level Outcomes , 2005, MIS Q..

[13]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  A Model-Based Framework to Overlap Product Development Activities , 1997 .

[14]  Joseph A. Cote,et al.  Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Reality or artifact? , 1989 .

[15]  Nicholas Argyres,et al.  The Impact of Information Technology on Coordination: Evidence From the B-2 , 1999 .

[16]  B P O'Connor,et al.  SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test , 2000, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[17]  Peter W. G. Morris,et al.  The Wiley Guide to Managing Projects , 2004 .

[18]  M. Iansiti.  Shooting the Rapids: Managing Product Development in Turbulent Environments , 1995 .

[19]  W. D. Perreault,et al.  Reliability of Nominal Data Based on Qualitative Judgments , 1989 .

[20]  James D. Thompson.  Organizations in Action , 1967 .

[21]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Exchanging Preliminary Information in Concurrent Engineering: Alternative Coordination Strategies , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[22]  John Preston,et al.  Winning at New Products , 1988 .

[23]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Data analysis in social psychology. , 1998 .

[24]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[25]  A. Roth,et al.  Strategic Determinants of Service Quality and Performance: Evidence from the Banking Industry , 1995 .

[26]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[27]  B. Kintz,et al.  Computational Handbook of Statistics , 1968 .

[28]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) Competence Constructs: Two-Stage Multi-Item Scale Development and Validation , 2002, Decis. Sci..

[29]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  Envisioning IT-Enabled Innovation , 1998 .

[30]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  The Concept of Fit in Contingency Theory. , 1984 .

[31]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Strategic decision processes in high velocity environments: four cases in the microcomputer industry , 1988 .

[32]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  Special Issue on Design and Development: Developing Products on "Internet Time": The Anatomy of a Flexible Development Process , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[33]  Mohan V. Tatikonda,et al.  Integrating Operations and Marketing Perspectives of Product Innovation: The Influence of Organizational Process Factors and Capabilities on Development Performance , 2001 .

[34]  Willy Herroelen,et al.  Project scheduling under uncertainty: Survey and research potentials , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[35]  T. S. Ragu-Nathan,et al.  The Q-Sort Method: Assessing Reliability And Construct Validity Of Questionnaire Items At A Pre-Testing Stage , 2002 .

[36]  Robert G. Cooper,et al.  Winning at new products : accelerating the process from idea to launch , 2001 .

[37]  Donald C. Hambrick,et al.  Operationalizing the Concept of Business-Level Strategy in Research , 1980 .

[38]  Paul S. Adler,et al.  From project to process management: an empirically-based framework for analyzing product development time , 1995 .

[39]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Paradox Lost? Firm-Level Evidence on the Returns to Information Systems Spending , 1996 .

[40]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Configurations of inter-organizational relationships : a comparison between US and Japanese automakers , 1995 .

[41]  Mohanbir Sawhney,et al.  New Offering Realization in the Networked Digital Environment , 2001 .

[42]  Charles W. Hofer.  Toward a Contingency Theory of Business Strategy , 1975 .

[43]  Michael A. Cusumano,et al.  How Microsoft Makes Large Teams Work Like Small Teams , 1997 .

[44]  Aaron J. Shenhar,et al.  How Projects Differ, And What to Do About It , 2007 .

[45]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  Agility in Retail Banking: A Numerical Taxonomy of Strategic Service Groups , 2001, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[46]  Jay R. Galbraith.  Designing Complex Organizations , 1973 .

[47]  A. Roth,et al.  A taxonomy of manufacturing strategies , 1994 .

[48]  Traci Carte,et al.  A Capabilities-Based Theory of Technology Deployment in Diverse Teams: Leapfrogging the Pitfalls of Diversity and Leveraging Its Potential with Collaborative Technology , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[49]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  Strategy‐making and environment: The third link , 1983 .

[50]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Product development performance : strategy, organization, and management in the world auto industry / Kim B. Clark, Tahahiro Fujimoto , 1991 .

[51]  K. Eisenhardt,et al.  Accelerating Adaptive Processes: Product Innovation in the Global Computer Industry , 1995 .

[52]  Mohan V. Tatikonda,et al.  Successful execution of product development projects: Balancing firmness and flexibility in the innovation process , 2000 .

[53]  Christopher A. Voss,et al.  Alternative paradigms for manufacturing strategy , 1995 .

[54]  Catherine Maguire,et al.  The Relationship between Job and Life Satisfaction: Evidence from a Remote Mining Community , 2000 .

[55]  J. Barney,et al.  CAPABILITIES, BUSINESS PROCESSES, AND COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: CHOOSING THE DEPENDENT VARIABLE IN EMPIRICAL TESTS OF THE RESOURCE-BASED VIEW , 2004 .

[56]  Robert P. Smith,et al.  A model-based method for organizing tasks in product development , 1994 .

[57]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Measuring the Effectiveness of Overlapping Development Activities , 1999 .

[58]  James C. Anderson,et al.  Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validities. , 1991 .

[59]  Roland T. Rust,et al.  Feature Fatigue: When Product Capabilities Become Too Much of a Good Thing , 2005 .

[60]  F. W. McFarlan,et al.  Portfolio approach to information systems , 1989 .

[61]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[62]  Paul M. Swamidass,et al.  Manufacturing strategy, environmental uncertainty and performance: a path analytic model , 1987 .

[63]  G. Hamilton,et al.  Coordination: Evidence from the B-2 "Stealth " Bomber , 2008 .

[64]  Victoria L. Mitchell,et al.  The Effects of Coupling it and Work Process Strategies in Redesign Projects , 1999 .

[65]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  Information-Processing Alternatives for Coping with Manufacturing Environment Complexity , 1999 .

[66]  T. Allen.  Managing the flow of technology , 1977 .

[67]  Christoph H. Loch,et al.  Communication and Uncertainty in Concurrent Engineering , 1998 .

[68]  Vish Krishnan,et al.  Designing a Family of Development-Intensive Products , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[69]  E. H. Neilsen,et al.  The subordinate's predicaments. , 1979, Harvard business review.

[70]  Stefan H. Thomke,et al.  Capturing the real value of innovation tools , 2006 .

[71]  Barrie R. Nault,et al.  An Information Processing Model of Information Systems Impact on Interorganizational Coordination , 2008 .