Statistical DNA Forensics

[1]  W. Fung,et al.  Power of exclusion revisited: probability of excluding relatives of the true father from paternity , 2002, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[2]  Madhuri S. Mulekar,et al.  Weight-of Evidence for Forensic DNA Profiles , 2008, Technometrics.

[3]  M. Hammer,et al.  Population structure of Y chromosome SNP haplogroups in the United States and forensic implications for constructing Y chromosome STR databases. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[4]  Tsewei Wang,et al.  Least‐Square Deconvolution: A Framework for Interpreting Short Tandem Repeat Mixtures * , 2006, Journal of forensic sciences.

[5]  Yue-Qing Hu,et al.  On statistical analysis of forensic DNA: theory, methods and computer programs. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[6]  R. J. Herrera,et al.  Iranian STR variation at the fringes of biogeographical demarcation. , 2006, Forensic science international.

[7]  A. Carracedo,et al.  DNA Commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics (ISFG): an update of the recommendations on the use of Y-STRs in forensic analysis , 2006, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[8]  R. Lessig,et al.  Experiences in tsunami victim identification , 2006, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[9]  John Buckleton,et al.  Relatedness and DNA: are we taking it seriously enough? , 2005, Forensic science international.

[10]  Power of excluding an elder brother of a child from paternity. , 2005, Forensic science international.

[11]  S. Zegura,et al.  Human Evolutionary Genetics: Origins, Peoples and Disease. , 2005 .

[12]  Twk Fung,et al.  Evaluating mixed DNA profiles with the presence of relatives: Theory, method, and computer software , 2005 .

[13]  Wing K. Fung,et al.  Evaluation of DNA mixtures involving two pairs of relatives , 2004, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[14]  J. Buckleton,et al.  Forensic DNA Evidence Interpretation , 2004 .

[15]  W. Fung,et al.  Full siblings impersonating parent/child prove most difficult to discredit with DNA profiling alone , 2004, Transfusion.

[16]  Franco Taroni,et al.  Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists , 2004 .

[17]  W. Fung,et al.  On the power of excluding relatives of the true father from paternity , 2004 .

[18]  Wing K. Fung,et al.  Interpreting DNA Mixtures with Related Contributors in Subdivided Populations , 2004 .

[19]  Twk Fung,et al.  Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA): statistical analysis , 2004 .

[20]  Fabio Corradi,et al.  The evaluation of DNA evidence in pedigrees requiring population inference , 2003 .

[21]  T. Egeland,et al.  Estimating the number of contributors to a DNA profile , 2003, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[22]  Yue-Qing Hu,et al.  Testing for kinship in a subdivided population. , 2003, Forensic science international.

[23]  James M Curran,et al.  What is the magnitude of the subpopulation effect? , 2003, Forensic science international.

[24]  W. Fung,et al.  How well do serial tandem repeat loci perform in excluding paternity in relatives of the biologic father among immigration cases? , 2003, Transfusion.

[25]  Wing K. Fung,et al.  Evaluating forensic DNA mixtures with contributors of different structured ethnic origins: a computer software , 2003, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[26]  Wing K. Fung,et al.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF FORENSIC DNA: COMPUTATIONAL PROBLEMS SOLVED AND TO BE SOLVED , 2003 .

[27]  Paolo Garbolino,et al.  A graphical model for the evaluation of cross-transfer evidence in DNA profiles. , 2003, Theoretical population biology.

[28]  W. Fung,et al.  Interpreting DNA mixtures with the presence of relatives , 2003, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[29]  Dw Van Boxel,et al.  Probabilistic Expert Systems for Forensic Inference from Genetic Markers , 2002 .

[30]  B. Vastag.  Out of tragedy, identification innovation. , 2002, JAMA.

[31]  Frances Fiorino.  CRASH SPURS REVAMP OF CHINA AIRLINES , 2002 .

[32]  D. Sweet,et al.  Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of sibship calculations using AmpFlSTR Profiler Plus , 2002, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[33]  Jonathan Whitaker,et al.  Interpreting small quantities of DNA: the hierarchy of propositions and the use of Bayesian networks. , 2002, Journal of forensic sciences.

[34]  M. Stoneking,et al.  Online Y-chromosomal short tandem repeat haplotype reference database (YHRD) for U.S. populations. , 2002, Journal of forensic sciences.

[35]  Paolo Garbolino,et al.  Evaluation of scientific evidence using Bayesian networks. , 2002, Forensic science international.

[36]  Angel Carracedo,et al.  Motherless case in paternity testing by Lee et al. , 2002, Forensic science international.

[37]  B Brinkmann,et al.  DNA Commission of the International Society of Forensic Genetics: recommendations on forensic analysis using Y-chromosome STRs. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[38]  A. Dawid,et al.  Non-fatherhood or mutation? A probabilistic approach to parental exclusion in paternity testing. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[39]  B Brinkmann,et al.  Considerations by the European DNA profiling (EDNAP) group on the working practices, nomenclature and interpretation of mitochondrial DNA profiles. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[40]  J. Thomson,et al.  Analysis of disputed single-parent/child and sibling relationships using 16 STR loci , 2001, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[41]  A P Dawid,et al.  Comment on Stockmarr's "Likelihood ratios for evaluating DNA evidence when the suspect is found through a database search". , 2001, Biometrics.

[42]  R. Fimmers,et al.  Paternity testing using Y-STR haplotypes: assigning a probability for paternity in cases of mutations , 2001, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[43]  James Robertson,et al.  Statistical Science in the Courtroom , 2001 .

[44]  V. Pascali,et al.  Online reference database of European Y-chromosomal short tandem repeat (STR) haplotypes. , 2001, Forensic science international.

[45]  B Budowle,et al.  CODIS STR loci data from 41 sample populations. , 2001, Journal of forensic sciences.

[46]  Ranajit Chakraborty,et al.  Population variation at the CODIS core short tandem repeat loci in Europeans. , 2001, Legal medicine.

[47]  C. T. Chiu,et al.  Population data for 12 STR loci in Hong Kong Chinese , 2001, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[48]  V. Pascali,et al.  A new method for the evaluation of matches in non-recombining genomes: application to Y-chromosomal short tandem repeat (STR) haplotypes in European males. , 2000, Forensic science international.

[49]  H. Polesky,et al.  The use and abuse of the full‐sibling and half‐sibling indices , 2000, Transfusion.

[50]  B Brinkmann,et al.  DNA commission of the international society for forensic genetics: guidelines for mitochondrial DNA typing. , 2000, Forensic science international.

[51]  T Egeland,et al.  Beyond traditional paternity and identification cases. Selecting the most probable pedigree. , 2000, Forensic science international.

[52]  A Sajantila,et al.  Characteristics and frequency of germline mutations at microsatellite loci from the human Y chromosome, as revealed by direct observation in father/son pairs. , 2000, American journal of human genetics.

[53]  J W Lee,et al.  Motherless case in paternity testing. , 2000, Forensic science international.

[54]  Anders Stockmarr.  The Choice of Hypotheses in the Evaluation of DNA Profile Evidence , 2000 .

[55]  Twk Fung.  User Friendly Programs for Paternity Calculations , 2000 .

[56]  J Buckleton,et al.  The calculation of DNA match probabilities in mixed race populations. , 2000, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[57]  Á. Carracedo,et al.  Genetic diversity of nine STRs in two northwest Iberian populations: Galicia and northern Portugal , 2000, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[58]  C. Pu,et al.  Genetic variation at nine STR loci in populations from the Philippines and Thailand living in Taiwan. , 1999, Forensic science international.

[59]  J. W. Lee,et al.  Paternity probability when a relative of the father is an alleged father. , 1999, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[60]  J M Curran,et al.  Interpreting DNA mixtures in structured populations. , 1999, Journal of forensic sciences.

[61]  M. Holland,et al.  Mitochondrial DNA Sequence Analysis - Validation and Use for Forensic Casework. , 1999, Forensic science review.

[62]  V. Pilotti,et al.  Validation of short tandem repeat analysis for the investigation of cases of disputed paternity. , 1999, Forensic science international.

[63]  A. Linacre,et al.  The use of mitochondrial DNA and short tandem repeat typing in the identification of air crash victims , 1999, Electrophoresis.

[64]  D N Stivers,et al.  The utility of short tandem repeat loci beyond human identification: Implications for development of new DNA typing systems , 1999, Electrophoresis.

[65]  M. Sjerps,et al.  On the consequences of DNA profile mismatches for close relatives of an excluded suspect , 1999, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[66]  J S Buckleton,et al.  Applications and extensions of subpopulation theory: a caseworkers guide. , 1998, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[67]  I. Evett,et al.  Interpreting DNA Evidence: Statistical Genetics for Forensic Scientists , 1998 .

[68]  B Brinkmann,et al.  Mutation rate in human microsatellites: influence of the structure and length of the tandem repeat. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.

[69]  J Buckleton,et al.  Interpreting simple STR mixtures using allele peak areas. , 1998, Forensic science international.

[70]  A Jamieson,et al.  Comparisons of three probability formulae for parentage exclusion. , 1997, Animal genetics.

[71]  P. de Knijff,et al.  Estimating Y chromosome specific microsatellite mutation frequencies using deep rooting pedigrees. , 1997, Human molecular genetics.

[72]  C. Brenner.  Symbolic kinship program. , 1997, Genetics.

[73]  D. Klarkowski,et al.  DNA analysis in disputed parentage: The occurrence of two apparently false exclusions of paternity, both at short tandem repeat (STR) loci, in the one child , 1997, Electrophoresis.

[74]  A. P. Dawid,et al.  Coherent Analysis of Forensic Identification Evidence , 1996 .

[75]  R. Chakraborty,et al.  Paternity exclusion by DNA markers: effects of paternal mutations. , 1996, Journal of forensic sciences.

[76]  D. Wong,et al.  Allele frequencies of four VNTR loci in the Chinese population in Hong Kong. , 1996, Forensic science international.

[77]  Wing K. Fung,et al.  10% or 5% match window in DNA profiling , 1996 .

[78]  Twk Fung,et al.  Determination of both parents using DNA profiling , 1996 .

[79]  S. Geisser,et al.  Testing independence when the form of the bivariate distribution is unspecified. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[80]  P. Donnelly.  Nonindependence of matches at different loci in DNA profiles: quantifying the effect of close relatives on the match probability , 1995, Heredity.

[81]  P. Gill,et al.  Identification of the remains of the Romanov family by DNA analysis , 1994, Nature Genetics.

[82]  B S Weir,et al.  The effects of inbreeding on forensic calculations. , 1994, Annual review of genetics.

[83]  B S Weir,et al.  Independence tests for VNTR alleles defined as quantile bins. , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[84]  N. Freimer,et al.  Allele frequencies at microsatellite loci: the stepwise mutation model revisited. , 1993, Genetics.

[85]  S. Geisser,et al.  Testing Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium on allelic data from VNTR loci. , 1992, American Journal of Human Genetics.

[86]  E. Thompson,et al.  Performing the exact test of Hardy-Weinberg proportion for multiple alleles. , 1992, Biometrics.

[87]  Max P. Baur,et al.  How to Deal with Mutations in DNA-Testing , 1992 .

[88]  B Budowle,et al.  Fixed-bin analysis for statistical evaluation of continuous distributions of allelic data from VNTR loci, for use in forensic comparisons. , 1991, American journal of human genetics.

[89]  Michael O. Finkelstein,et al.  Statistics for Lawyers , 2002 .

[90]  Robert A. Stine,et al.  An Introduction to Bootstrap Methods , 1989 .

[91]  David H. Kaye.  The Probability of an Ultimate Issue: The Strange Cases of Paternity Testing , 1989 .

[92]  Jody Hey,et al.  Principles of population genetics (2nd edn) , 1989 .

[93]  C. Brenner,et al.  The Avuncular Index and the Incest Index , 1988 .

[94]  M. Nei.  Molecular Evolutionary Genetics , 1987 .

[95]  I. M. Sebetan,et al.  A simple method for calculating the probability of excluding paternity with any number of codominant alleles. , 1982, Forensic science international.

[96]  R. A. Groeneveld,et al.  Practical Nonparametric Statistics (2nd ed). , 1981 .

[97]  L. Lebeck,et al.  Exclusion of paternity without testing the mother. , 1980, American journal of clinical pathology.

[98]  A Usher,et al.  Paternity testing. , 1977, British medical journal.

[99]  W. R. Buckland,et al.  Distributions in Statistics: Continuous Multivariate Distributions , 1973 .

[100]  D A Jones,et al.  Blood samples: probability of discrimination. , 1972, Journal - Forensic Science Society.

[101]  A. S. Wiener,et al.  Studies in Isohemagglutination: IV. On the Chances of Proving Non-Paternity: With Special Reference to Blood Groups , 1930 .