Scattered radiation in scanning slot mammography.

Monte Carlo simulations were used to quantify the amount of scattered radiation a scanning slot detector geometry designed for use in digital mammography. Ratios of the scatter to primary (S/P) x-ray photon energy absorbed in the detector were obtained for a Lucite phantom, and were investigated as a function of photon energy, phantom thickness, and slot detector width. Over a Lucite phantom thickness range of 2-6 cm, the S/P ratios range from about 0.10 to 0.17 for a 4 mm wide slot detector at the x-ray photon energies used in mammography. These ratios increased by a factor of approximately 1.8 when the slot width was increased to 10 mm. In general, 20 keV photons gave S/P ratios similar to those of a 30 kVp x-ray spectrum (Mo target + 30 microns Mo filtration). The use of a 3 cm air gap reduced the S/P ratios by a factor of between 2.5 and 3.4, depending on the phantom thickness. For a constant primary energy fluence, coherent scatter was reduced as photon energy increased, whereas Compton scatter increased with increasing photon energy. With no air gap, the contributions of coherent and Compton scatter were found to be equal at 25 keV, whereas the introduction of a 3 cm air gap resulted in equal contributions for the two scatter processes at 36 keV. A 10 mm wide slot detector consisting of a 36.7 mg/cm2 thick Gd2O2S:Tb phosphor screen was compared to an ideal detector absorbing all incident primary/scatter photons. Average differences in the S/P ratios for these two detectors were 7% with no air gap and approximately 4% with a 3 cm air gap. The results obtained in this study will assist in the design of an optimal slot detector for use in digital mammography.

[1]  S. C. Prasad,et al.  Scatter reduction in mammography with air gap. , 1996, Medical physics.

[2]  C.W.E. van Eijk,et al.  Monte Carlo modeling of coherent scattering: influence of interference , 1995 .

[3]  R Fahrig,et al.  Performance of glass fiber antiscatter devices at mammographic energies. , 1994, Medical physics.

[4]  U Neitzel,et al.  X-ray diffraction measurements of some plastic materials and body tissues. , 1987, Medical physics.

[5]  Rebecca Fahrig,et al.  Optimization of peak kilovoltage and spectral shape for digital mammography , 1992, Medical Imaging.

[6]  H Bernstein,et al.  On the significance of very small angle scattered radiation to radiographic imaging at low energies. , 1983, Medical physics.

[7]  Michele F. Piccaro,et al.  Design and development of a fiber optic TDI CCD-based slot-scan digital mammography system , 1993, Optics & Photonics.

[8]  M A King,et al.  Experimental measurements of the scatter reduction obtained in mammography with a scanning multiple slit assembly. , 1981, Medical physics.

[9]  Martin J. Yaffe,et al.  Solid state x-ray detectors for digital mammography , 1995, Medical Imaging.

[10]  D R Dance,et al.  The computation of scatter in mammography by Monte Carlo methods. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  P P Fatouros,et al.  The effect of breast composition on absorbed dose and image contrast. , 1989, Medical physics.

[12]  R Speller,et al.  A multiparameter optimization of digital mammography. , 1995, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  M J Yaffe,et al.  Coherent scatter in diagnostic radiology. , 1983, Medical physics.

[14]  I A Brezovich,et al.  The intensity of scattered radiation in mammography. , 1978, Radiology.