Spatial relationship between large aspect angle VHF radio aurora and 557.7‐nm emissions: Evidence for refraction

A recently proposed explanation for large aspect angle VHF backscatter observations, based on refraction through auroral ionization structures in the E region (Moorcroft, 1989), has been confirmed by an experimental comparison of observations of auroral E region coherent backscatter at 48.5 MHz (made with the Bistatic Auroral Radar System or BARS) with simultaneous 557.7-nm emissions detected with a CCD-based all-sky imager. The apparently large aspect angle radio auroral echoes are found to occur predominantly on the side of the visual aurora away from the radar for both the premidnight and the postmidnight sectors. For the Red Lake BARS radar this means that the strongest echoes occur to the north of the visual form, in sharp contrast with previous comparisons, particularly for the premidnight sector, which found that radar echoes occur predominantly southward of the visual aurora. These results are consistent with the proposed explanation based on refraction in the auroral E region.

[1]  D. Moorcroft,et al.  Bistatic auroral radar system and three‐receiver‐ionospheric‐motions velocities: A comparison , 1990 .

[2]  J. Watermann Refraction of 50‐MHz radar waves in a realistic ionospheric model , 1990 .

[3]  J. St.‐Maurice,et al.  First results on the observation of 440‐MHz high‐latitude coherent echoes from the E region with the Millstone Hill Radar , 1989 .

[4]  D. Moorcroft Reflection and refraction by tilted layers: An explanation for VHF auroral backscatter at large aspect angles , 1989 .

[5]  D. Moorcroft,et al.  EISCAT as a tristatic auroral radar , 1989 .

[6]  A. G. McNamara,et al.  Flow and aspect angle dependence of 3‐m irregularities in the auroral E region , 1989 .

[7]  D. Moorcroft,et al.  E region coherent backscatter at short wavelength and large aspect angle , 1988 .

[8]  P. Williams,et al.  The amplitude of auroral backscatter—I. Model estimates of the dependence on electron density , 1988 .

[9]  D. T. Farley,et al.  Plasma irregularities associated with a morning discrete auroral arc: Radar interferometer observations and theory , 1985 .

[10]  D. Moorcroft An examination of radio-auroral aspect sensitivity , 1985 .

[11]  R. Vondrak,et al.  Simultaneous Chatanika radar and S3-2 satellite measurements of ionospheric electrodynamics in the diffuse aurora , 1982 .

[12]  T. Hughes,et al.  Eccentric dipole coordinates for MAGSAT data presentation and analysis of external current effects , 1982 .

[13]  R. Vondrak,et al.  Chatanika Radar observations of the electrostatic potential distribution of an auroral arc , 1982 .

[14]  A. G. McNamara,et al.  Bars — A dual bistatic auroral radar system for the study of electric fields in the Canadian sector of the auroral zone , 1982 .

[15]  W. Weiss,et al.  STARE: A new radar auroral backscatter experiment in northern Scandinavia , 1978 .

[16]  Y. Kamide,et al.  Relationship of radar aurora, visual aurora, and auroral electrojets in the evening sector , 1976 .

[17]  E. Fremouw,et al.  Radar auroral substorm signatures, 1. Expansive and recovery phases , 1976 .

[18]  R. Vondrak,et al.  Radar measurements of the latitudinal variation of auroral ionization , 1976 .

[19]  D. Mcdiarmid On errors in the measurement of the aspect sensitivity of radio aurora , 1976 .

[20]  E. Fremouw,et al.  An all-sky-camera format for radar auroral studies , 1975 .

[21]  R. Greenwald,et al.  Auroral currents, irregularities, and luminosity , 1973 .

[22]  Warner L. Ecklund,et al.  VHF Doppler spectra of radar echoes associated with a visual auroral form: observations and implications , 1973 .

[23]  D. Mcdiarmid On the aspect sensitivity of radio aurora. , 1972 .

[24]  P. E. Kelly THE ASSOCIATION BETWEEN RADIO AND VISUAL AURORA , 1965 .

[25]  G. Lyon THE ASSOCIATION OF VISIBLE AURORAL FORMS WITH RADAR ECHOES , 1960 .