Evaluation of an AI system for the automated detection of glaucoma from stereoscopic optic disc photographs: the European Optic Disc Assessment Study

To evaluate the performance of a deep learning based Artificial Intelligence (AI) software for detection of glaucoma from stereoscopic optic disc photographs, and to compare this performance to the performance of a large cohort of ophthalmologists and optometrists. A retrospective study evaluating the diagnostic performance of an AI software (Pegasus v1.0, Visulytix Ltd., London UK) and comparing it with that of 243 European ophthalmologists and 208 British optometrists, as determined in previous studies, for the detection of glaucomatous optic neuropathy from 94 scanned stereoscopic photographic slides scanned into digital format. Pegasus was able to detect glaucomatous optic neuropathy with an accuracy of 83.4% (95% CI: 77.5–89.2). This is comparable to an average ophthalmologist accuracy of 80.5% (95% CI: 67.2–93.8) and average optometrist accuracy of 80% (95% CI: 67–88) on the same images. In addition, the AI system had an intra-observer agreement (Cohen’s Kappa, κ) of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.63–0.85), compared with 0.70 (range: −0.13–1.00; 95% CI: 0.67–0.73) and 0.71 (range: 0.08–1.00) for ophthalmologists and optometrists, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the performance of the deep learning system and ophthalmologists or optometrists. The AI system obtained a diagnostic performance and repeatability comparable to that of the ophthalmologists and optometrists. We conclude that deep learning based AI systems, such as Pegasus, demonstrate significant promise in the assisted detection of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.

[1]  H. Quigley Number of people with glaucoma worldwide. , 1996, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  C Fenerty,et al.  Agreement between ophthalmologists and optometrists in optic disc assessment: training implications for glaucoma co-management , 2001, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[3]  B A Teitelbaum,et al.  Interobserver variability in the estimation of the cup/disk ratio among observers of differing educational background. , 2001, Optometry.

[4]  H. Quigley,et al.  The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020 , 2006, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[5]  J. Kirwan,et al.  Optometrists referrals for glaucoma assessment: a prospective survey of clinical data and outcomes , 2010, Eye.

[6]  Jost B Jonas,et al.  Clinical assessment of stereoscopic optic disc photographs for glaucoma: the European Optic Disc Assessment Trial. , 2010, Ophthalmology.

[7]  S. Trikha,et al.  The Portsmouth-based glaucoma refinement scheme: a role for virtual clinics in the future? , 2012, Eye.

[8]  Daniel E Grigera,et al.  Level of agreement among Latin American glaucoma subspecialists on the diagnosis and treatment of glaucoma: results of an online survey. , 2013, Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia.

[9]  Tony Redmond,et al.  Assessment of optic disc photographs for glaucoma by UK optometrists: the Moorfields Optic Disc Assessment Study (MODAS) , 2013, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[10]  E. O'Neill,et al.  Glaucomatous optic neuropathy evaluation (GONE) project: the effect of monoscopic versus stereoscopic viewing conditions on optic nerve evaluation. , 2014, American journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  Jiang Liu,et al.  Glaucoma detection based on deep convolutional neural network. , 2015, Conference proceedings : ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference.

[12]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.

[13]  Tien Yin Wong,et al.  Glaucoma detection based on deep convolutional neural network , 2015, 2015 37th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[14]  Jian Sun,et al.  Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).

[15]  Subhashini Venugopalan,et al.  Development and Validation of a Deep Learning Algorithm for Detection of Diabetic Retinopathy in Retinal Fundus Photographs. , 2016, JAMA.

[16]  G Ratnarajan,et al.  Evaluating and optimising glaucoma referral refinement pathways with specific reference to the changes scheme , 2016 .

[17]  E. Finkelstein,et al.  Development and Validation of a Deep Learning System for Diabetic Retinopathy and Related Eye Diseases Using Retinal Images From Multiethnic Populations With Diabetes , 2017, JAMA.

[18]  Xiaochun Cao,et al.  Disc-Aware Ensemble Network for Glaucoma Screening From Fundus Image , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[19]  Yoshinori Mitamura,et al.  Topical Ripasudil Suppresses Retinal Ganglion Cell Death in a Mouse Model of Normal Tension Glaucoma. , 2018, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[20]  Geraint Rees,et al.  Clinically applicable deep learning for diagnosis and referral in retinal disease , 2018, Nature Medicine.

[21]  Louis R. Pasquale,et al.  Automated Evaluation of Optic Disc Images for Manifest Glaucoma Detection Using a Deep-Learning, Neural Network-Based Algorithm , 2018 .