Ten-year Successful Results of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Cross-linked Polyethylene

Introduction: Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) has been used for over a decade in total hip arthroplasty and has been shown to significantly reduce wear phenomena. At the knee, data are rare and the advantage of HXLPE inserts remains hypothetical because the stress regimen and wear mechanism are different. HXLPE has been accused of notwithstanding shear and peak compressive stresses. Our assumption was that the use of HXLPE would not compromise 10-year results compared to standard polyethylene. We asked whether[1] it would affect 10-year survival of primary total knee arthroplasty; [2] it would impair 10-year radiographic and clinical results. Methods: We examined 97 patients (Group 1) who underwent total knee arthroplasty with HXLPE (Durasul) over 10 years ago. These patients were retrospectively compared to 50 patients operated on in the same period using the same implant (Natural Knee 2, Zimmer) with standard polyethylene (sterilized in inert atmosphere) by other surgeons from the same institution (Group 2). Functional and radiographic results (from standard radiographs) were compared in terms of survival, clinical outcomes, and osteolysis. Sixty-four patients from Group 1 and 30 patients from Group 2 were examined with a follow-up of more than 10 years. Seventeen of Groups 1 and 12 in Group 2 died. Five and 14 patients, respectively, were lost. Results: 10-year survival rates, including revision for any cause, were 97 ± 3 and 91 ± 10%, respectively (P = 0.19). Two patients in Group 1 were reviewed due to instability and stiffness of the knee, and three patients in Group 2 were reviewed due to infection, instability, and patellar pain. Otherwise, the International Knee Society, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and mobility interval scores were not significantly different (P-values of 0.6, 0.7, and 0.7, respectively). None of the radiographs of the two groups showed osteolysis or widening radiolucencies. Conclusions: 10-year functional and radiographic results were not compromised by the use of HXLPE in cemented primary knee arthroplasty. On the other hand, the advantage of using HCLP in total knee arthroplasty is not yet proven. Longer monitoring and more accurate wear assessment are needed.

[1]  O. Diamond,et al.  Five cases of tibial post fracture in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty using Prolong highly cross-linked polyethylene. , 2018, The Knee.

[2]  P. Lachiewicz,et al.  Highly Cross-linked Polyethylene Provides Decreased Osteolysis and Reoperation at Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up. , 2016, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[3]  R. Meneghini,et al.  Multicenter Study of Highly Cross-linked vs Conventional Polyethylene in Total Knee Arthroplasty. , 2016, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[4]  P. Lachiewicz,et al.  Is There a Benefit to Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene in Posterior-stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Randomized Trial , 2016, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  C. Clark,et al.  In Vivo Performance of Moderately Crosslinked, Thermally Treated Polyethylene in a Prospective Randomized Controlled Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Trial. , 2015, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[6]  O. Muratoglu,et al.  Lower prosthesis-specific 10-year revision rate with crosslinked than with non-crosslinked polyethylene in primary total knee arthroplasty , 2015, Acta orthopaedica.

[7]  Young-Hoo Kim,et al.  Highly Crosslinked-remelted versus Less-crosslinked Polyethylene in Posterior Cruciate-retaining TKAs in the Same Patients , 2015, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[8]  Young-Hoo Kim,et al.  Comparison of highly cross-linked and conventional polyethylene in posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty in the same patients. , 2014, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  N. Caplan,et al.  The Knee Society Total Knee Arthroplasty Roentgenographic Evaluation and Scoring System , 2014 .

[10]  G. Gil-Gómez,et al.  Highly crosslinked polyethylene does not reduce the wear in total knee arthroplasty: in vivo study of particles in synovial fluid. , 2013, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[11]  B. Pijls,et al.  Polyethylene thickness is a risk factor for wear necessitating insert exchange , 2011, International Orthopaedics.

[12]  K. Takaoka,et al.  In vivo comparison of wear particles between highly crosslinked polyethylene and conventional polyethylene in the same design of total knee arthroplasties. , 2009, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[13]  A. Hofmann,et al.  Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene is Safe for Use in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2008, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[14]  J. Heizmann,et al.  Accuracy and reproducibility of computer-assisted measurement of polyethylene wear in knee arthroplasty. , 2008, Acta orthopaedica Belgica.

[15]  Murali Jasty,et al.  Knee-simulator testing of conventional and cross-linked polyethylene tibial inserts. , 2004, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[16]  E. Roos,et al.  The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS): from joint injury to osteoarthritis , 2003, Health and quality of life outcomes.

[17]  D. D’Lima,et al.  Polyethylene cross‐linking by two different methods reduces acetabular liner wear in a hip joint wear simulator , 2003, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[18]  W. Harris,et al.  Aggressive Wear Testing of a Cross-Linked Polyethylene in Total Knee Arthroplasty , 2002, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  G Lewis,et al.  Effect of crosslinking UHMWPE on its tensile and compressive creep performance. , 2001, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[20]  L. Pruitt,et al.  Study of fatigue resistance of chemical and radiation crosslinked medical grade ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene. , 1999, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[21]  F. Shen,et al.  Development of an extremely wear‐resistant ultra high molecular weight polythylene for total hip replacements , 1999, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[22]  L. Dorr,et al.  Rationale of the Knee Society clinical rating system. , 1989, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.