Source localization of tone perception in alcoholic brain indexed by standardized low-resolution electromagnetic tomography

Alcohol consumption is known to associate with several diseases, injuries, and social problems. The long-term, excessive alcohol exposure can lead to liver cirrhosis and pancreatitis. After repating alcohol exposure, alcohol dependence would develop an individually behavioral, cognitive, and physiological phenomenon. Previous studies indicated that although the left hemisphere was selectively employed for processing linguistic information irrespectively of acoustic cues or subtype of phonological unit, the right hemisphere was employed for prosody-specific cues. These previous studies provided the impetus for future investigations of tone perception and temporal integration differences in tonal brain speaker who had long-term, excessive alcohol exposure such as Thai in the present study. The present study used both an auditory mismatch negativity (MMN) component of event-related potentials (ERPs) recording and the standardized Low-resolution Electromagnetic Tomography (sLORETA) techniques to measure the degree of cortical activation and to localize the brain area contributing to the scalp recorded auditory MMN component during the passive oddball paradigm. Ten healthy right-handed adults participated in this study. The findings showed that both [kha:] - mid tone perception and [kha:] - high tone perception elicited a strong MMN between 215-284 ms with reference to the standard-stimulus ERPs. Source localization was obtained in the middle temporal gyrus of the right hemisphere for both [kha:] - mid tone perception and [kha:] - high tone perception. Automatic detection of tone perception in alcoholic tonal brain is a useful index of language universal auditory memory traces.

[1]  S. Bradbury Lexicon of alcohol and drug terms, 1st edition , 1995 .

[2]  Fredrik H. Karlsson,et al.  Gut metagenome in European women with normal, impaired and diabetic glucose control , 2013, Nature.

[3]  A. Hajeer,et al.  Book Reviews Importance of Maintaining the Services Which Currently Exist in Scotland , 2022 .

[4]  Stephen M. Rao,et al.  Human Brain Language Areas Identified by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  K Mori,et al.  Task‐dependent laterality for cue decoding during spoken language processing , 1998, Neuroreport.

[6]  G Nyman,et al.  Mismatch negativity (MMN) for sequences of auditory and visual stimuli: evidence for a mechanism specific to the auditory modality. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[7]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Intermodal selective attention. II. Effects of attentional load on processing of auditory and visual stimuli in central space. , 1992, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[8]  B. Sivamaruthi,et al.  Influence of Probiotic Supplementation on Brain Function: Involvement of Gut Microbiome, Inflammation, and Stress Pathway , 2018, Gut Microbiota - Brain Axis.

[9]  C. Manichanh,et al.  Reduced diversity of faecal microbiota in Crohn’s disease revealed by a metagenomic approach , 2005, Gut.

[10]  B. Sivamaruthi,et al.  A Review on Role of Microbiome in Obesity and Antiobesity Properties of Probiotic Supplements , 2019, BioMed research international.

[11]  B. Naliboff,et al.  Consumption of fermented milk product with probiotic modulates brain activity. , 2013, Gastroenterology.

[12]  E. Amenedo,et al.  MMN in the visual modality: a review , 2003, Biological Psychology.

[13]  R. Näätänen,et al.  Early selective-attention effect on evoked potential reinterpreted. , 1978, Acta psychologica.

[14]  Risto Näätänen,et al.  Mismatch negativity and behavioural discrimination in humans as a function of the magnitude of change in sound duration , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[15]  M. Lamb,et al.  The Two Sides of Perception , 1998, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  G. Huffnagle,et al.  Does the microbiota regulate immune responses outside the gut? , 2004, Trends in microbiology.

[17]  C. Manichanh,et al.  Review article: the role of bacteria in onset and perpetuation of inflammatory bowel disease , 2006, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[18]  Li Juan Zhang,et al.  Effect of alcohol on miR-212 expression in intestinal epithelial cells and its potential role in alcoholic liver disease. , 2008, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[19]  Eunseog Youn,et al.  Pyrosequencing study of fecal microflora of autistic and control children. , 2010, Anaerobe.

[20]  Risto N t nen Attention and brain function , 1992 .

[21]  K Alho,et al.  Mismatch negativity to auditory stimulus change recorded directly from the human temporal cortex. , 1995, Psychophysiology.

[22]  D. Lehmann,et al.  Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain. , 1994, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[23]  D. Javitt,et al.  The Mismatch Negativity of Event‐Related Potentials as a Probe of Transient Auditory Memory: A Review , 1995, Ear and hearing.

[24]  K. McCoy,et al.  The intestinal microbiota affect central levels of brain-derived neurotropic factor and behavior in mice. , 2011, Gastroenterology.

[25]  M. Kubota,et al.  Neuromagnetic auditory cortex responses to duration and pitch changes in tones: cross-linguistic comparisons of human subjects in directions of acoustic changes , 2002, Neuroscience Letters.

[26]  A. Paton,et al.  The risk of alcohol. , 1993, Addiction.

[27]  R Näätänen,et al.  Pre-attentive detection of vowel contrasts utilizes both phonetic and auditory memory representations. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[28]  K. Reinikainen,et al.  Do event-related potentials to infrequent decrements in duration of auditory stimuli demonstrate a memory trace in man? , 1989, Neuroscience Letters.

[29]  K. Barry,et al.  The alcohol use disorders identification test (AUDIT) in a college sample. , 1991, The International journal of the addictions.

[30]  Timothy P. L. Roberts,et al.  Magnetic mismatch fields elicited by vowel duration and pitch changes in Japanese words in humans: comparison between native- and non-speakers of Japanese , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[31]  S. Kuitunen-Paul,et al.  Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) and mortality risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis , 2018, Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health.

[32]  P. Angus,et al.  The role of the gut microbiota in NAFLD , 2016, Nature Reviews Gastroenterology &Hepatology.

[33]  G. Dehaene-Lambertz Electrophysiological correlates of categorical phoneme perception in adults , 1997, Neuroreport.

[34]  P. Alku,et al.  An event-related potential (ERP) study of duration changes in speech and non-speech sounds , 1999 .

[35]  D. Lancker,et al.  A Crosslinguistic PET Study of Tone Perception , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[36]  J. Schwaber,et al.  The role of the gut–brain axis in alcohol use disorders , 2016, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry.

[37]  A. Fort,et al.  Is the auditory sensory memory sensitive to visual information? , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[38]  R. Näätänen The perception of speech sounds by the human brain as reflected by the mismatch negativity (MMN) and its magnetic equivalent (MMNm). , 2001, Psychophysiology.