Applying the lessons of the attack on the world trade center, 11th September 2001, to the design and use of interactive evacuation simulations

The collapse of buildings, such as terminal 2E at Paris' Charles de Gaule Airport, and of fires, such as the Rhode Island, Station Night Club tragedy, has focused public attention on the safety of large public buildings. Initiatives in the United States and in Europe have led to the development of interactive simulators that model evacuation from these buildings. The tools avoid some of the ethical and legal problems from simulating evacuations; many people were injured during the 1993 evacuation of the World Trade Center (WTC) complex. They also use many concepts that originate within the CHI communities. For instance, some simulators use simple task models to represent the occupants' goal structures as they search for an available exit. However, the recent release of the report from the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks upon the United States (the '9/11 commission') has posed serious questions about the design and use of this particular class of interactive systems. This paper argues that simulation research needs to draw on insights from the CHI communities in order to meet some the challenges identified by the 9/11 commission.

[1]  Wendy E. Mackay,et al.  Users and customizable software : a co-adaptive phenomenon , 1990 .

[2]  Roy Rada,et al.  Interactive Media , 1995, Springer New York.

[3]  B. Nardi Context and consciousness: activity theory and human-computer interaction , 1995 .

[4]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[5]  M. Batty,et al.  Safety in Numbers? Modelling Crowds and Designing Control for the Notting Hill Carnival , 2003 .

[6]  Marilyn Tremaine,et al.  Experiences in the use of a media space , 1991, CHI.

[7]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers , 1994, CACM.

[8]  H. Murray,et al.  Explorations in Personality , 2007 .

[9]  John M. Carroll,et al.  Making Use: Scenario-Based Design of Human-Computer Interactions , 2000 .

[10]  Thomas W. Mastaglio,et al.  The role of critiquing in cooperative problem solving , 1991, TOIS.

[11]  Elizabeth D. Mynatt,et al.  Supporting communication and collaboration practices in safety-critical situations , 2000, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[12]  Sandip Sen,et al.  Learning cases to resolve conflicts and improve group behavior , 1998, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[13]  L. Clark,et al.  Relations between personality traits and self-reports of daily behavior , 2003 .

[14]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  Scalable nonlinear dynamical systems for agent steering and crowd simulation , 2001, Comput. Graph..

[15]  Jonathan J. Cadiz,et al.  Coordination, overload and team performance: effects of team communication strategies , 1998, CSCW '98.

[16]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Binding objects to scenarios of use , 1994, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[17]  E. W. Marchant,et al.  Computer and fluid modelling of evacuation , 1995 .