Generating variable shapes of salt geobodies from seismic images and prior geological knowledge

We have developed an implicit method to automatically generate several possible models of salt top surfaces with varying geometries and topologies. This method can be conditioned to available data such as well markers and seismic picks. Because seismic imaging of salt is prone to velocity uncertainty and Fresnel zone effects, the input of the method is a seismic image that is segmented into three regions: salt, sediments, and uncertain. The uncertain region contains the salt boundary, and all further computations focus within this zone. A monotonic scalar field, ranging from zero on the edge of the certain salt body to one on the maximal possible salt boundary, defines the cumulated probability for a point to be outside the salt body. A random scalar field, also bounded between zero and one, is then used as a threshold for the first scalar field. The salt boundary is implicitly defined by the zero isovalue of the difference between the two fields, and it can be further extracted using marching cubes. The random field parameters have a geometric and topological impact on the simulated salt volumes. They can be adapted to reproduce specific geological features, but their inference remains difficult. The application of the method for the reconstruction of diapir boundaries from a set of partly interpreted sections indicates that it is well-suited to honor numerous constraining data while proposing different possible structural scenarios in the uninterpreted parts.

[1]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[2]  M. R. Johnson Structural geology , 1977, Nature.

[3]  Donald Geman,et al.  Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[4]  J. Sethian,et al.  Fronts propagating with curvature-dependent speed: algorithms based on Hamilton-Jacobi formulations , 1988 .

[5]  J. Claerbout Earth Soundings Analysis: Processing Versus Inversion , 1992 .

[6]  B. Vendeville,et al.  The fall of diapirs during thin-skinned extension , 1992 .

[7]  P. Abrahamsen Bayesian Kriging for Seismic Depth Conversion of a Multi-Layer Reservoir , 1993 .

[8]  A. Soares,et al.  Geostatistics Tróia '92 , 1993 .

[9]  R. M. Srivastava,et al.  Multivariate Geostatistics: Beyond Bivariate Moments , 1993 .

[10]  C. Tilke Geostatistics Troia '92 , 1994 .

[11]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Normalized Cuts and Image Segmentation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[12]  P. Thore,et al.  Modelling of stochastic faults and fault networks in a structural uncertainty study , 2001, Petroleum Geoscience.

[13]  Pierre Thore,et al.  Structural uncertainties: Determination, management, and applications , 2002 .

[14]  Dengliang Gao,et al.  Volume texture extraction for 3D seismic visualization and interpretation , 2003 .

[15]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Snakes: Active contour models , 2004, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[16]  J. Mallet Space–Time Mathematical Framework for Sedimentary Geology , 2004 .

[17]  Z. Shipton,et al.  What do you think this is? "Conceptual uncertainty" in geoscience interpretation , 2007 .

[18]  Robert G. Clapp,et al.  Application of image segmentation to tracking 3D salt boundaries , 2007 .

[19]  G. Caumon,et al.  Elements for Stochastic Structural Perturbation of Stratigraphic Models , 2007 .

[20]  M. Jackson,et al.  Terra infirma: Understanding salt tectonics , 2007 .

[21]  J. Warren,et al.  Subsurface seismic record of salt glaciers in an extensional intracontinental setting (Late Triassic of northwestern Germany) , 2007 .

[22]  M. Jackson,et al.  Inflation and deflation of deeply buried salt stocks during lateral shortening , 2009 .

[23]  G. Caumon,et al.  ODSIM: An Object-Distance Simulation Method for Conditioning Complex Natural Structures , 2010 .

[24]  A. Solberg,et al.  Salt diapirs without well defined boundaries – a feasibility study of semi‐automatic detection , 2011 .

[25]  A. A. Aqrawi,et al.  Detecting Salt Domes Using a Dip Guided 3D Sobel Seismic Attribute , 2011 .

[26]  K. Giles,et al.  Concepts in halokinetic-sequence deformation and stratigraphy , 2012 .

[27]  C. Jackson,et al.  Origin of an anhydrite sheath encircling a salt diapir and implications for the seismic imaging of steep-sided salt structures, Egersund Basin, Northern North Sea , 2012, Journal of the Geological Society.

[28]  Xinming Wu,et al.  Generating a relative geologic time volume by 3D graph-cut phase unwrapping method with horizon and unconformity constraints , 2012 .

[29]  B. H. Fotland,et al.  Automated salt body extraction from seismic data using the level set method , 2013 .

[30]  D. Nichols,et al.  Model‐uncertainty quantification in seismic tomography: method and applications , 2013 .

[31]  Anne H. Schistad Solberg,et al.  Texture attributes for detection of salt , 2013 .

[32]  J. callot,et al.  Salt tectonics in the Sivas Basin, Turkey: outstanding seismic analogues from outcrops , 2013 .

[33]  P. Collon-Drouaillet,et al.  Simulation of 3D karst conduits with an object-distance based method integrating geological knowledge , 2014 .

[34]  E. Landa,et al.  Structural uncertainty of time-migrated seismic images , 2014 .

[35]  I. Jones,et al.  Seismic imaging in and around salt bodies , 2014 .

[36]  I. Jones,et al.  Seismic Imaging in and around Salt Bodies - Problems and Pitfalls Update , 2015 .

[37]  Amin Asjad,et al.  A new approach for salt dome detection using a 3D multidirectional edge detector , 2015, Applied Geophysics.

[38]  Xinming Wu Methods to compute salt likelihoods and extract salt boundaries from 3D seismic images , 2016 .

[39]  A. Escalona,et al.  The use of seismic attributes to enhance imaging of salt structures in the Barents Sea , 2016 .

[40]  Samuel T. Thiele,et al.  The topology of geology 1: Topological analysis , 2016 .

[41]  Xinming Wu Methods to compute salt likelihoods and extract salt boundaries from 3D seismic images , 2016 .

[42]  G. AlRegib,et al.  A texture-based interpretation workflow with application to delineating salt domes , 2017 .

[43]  M. Jackson,et al.  Salt Tectonics: Principles and Practice , 2017 .

[44]  Jeff B. Boisvert,et al.  Iterative refinement of implicit boundary models for improved geological feature reproduction , 2017, Comput. Geosci..

[45]  A. Bounaim,et al.  Automated salt interpretation: Part 2 - Smooth surface wrapping of volume attribute , 2017 .

[46]  J. R. Sandschaper,et al.  The Garden Banks Model Experience , 2015 .

[47]  Tao Ju,et al.  Topology-controlled reconstruction of multi-labelled domains from cross-sections , 2017, ACM Trans. Graph..

[48]  S. Fomel,et al.  Fast salt-boundary interpretation with optimal path picking , 2017 .

[49]  G. Caumon,et al.  Finite Difference Implicit Modeling of Geological Structures , 2018, 80th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2018.

[50]  S. Fomel,et al.  Fast salt boundary interpretation with optimal path picking , 2018 .

[51]  Anne H. Schistad Solberg,et al.  Convolutional neural networks for automated seismic interpretation , 2018, The Leading Edge.

[52]  Guillaume Caumon,et al.  3-D Structural geological models: Concepts, methods, and uncertainties , 2018 .

[53]  G. AlRegib,et al.  Multi-attribute k-means clustering for salt-boundary delineation from three-dimensional seismic data , 2018, Geophysical Journal International.

[54]  Mohamed A. Deriche,et al.  A comparative study of texture attributes for characterizing subsurface structures in seismic volumes , 2018, Interpretation.

[55]  S. Fomel,et al.  SaltSeg: Automatic 3D salt segmentation using a deep convolutional neural network , 2019, Interpretation.