Abandonment of Low-Vision Devices in an Outpatient Population

Purpose. To investigate abandonment rate of prescribed low-vision devices for near tasks and factors associated with abandonment in a U.S. outpatient population. Methods. A telephone survey was administered to 88 patients with low vision from four clinical sites about 1 year after examination and prescription of devices. Patients were surveyed on timing and frequency of use and reasons for abandonment of devices. The main outcome measure (abandonment) was defined as patient report of no use of prescribed device in the previous 3 months. Multivariate logistic regression was used to investigate significant vision and demographic factors related to abandonment. Results. Of 119 prescribed devices, 19% (95% CI, 12 to 26) had not been used within the previous 3 months. Mean (±SD) better eye visual acuity at examination was 0.61 ± 0.29 logMAR, and mean age was 77 ± 17 years. Mean time between device prescription and survey was 11 ± 3 months. Device abandonment was not associated with age (p = 0.863), time since prescription (p = 0.125), visual acuity (p = 0.804), or category of magnification device (spectacle, handheld, stand, or video) (p = 0.412). There was a significant association between documented non-central visual field loss and abandonment of magnification device (p = 0.046). Repeat administration of the survey resulted in the same abandonment classification in 15 of 15 patients (100%). Conclusions. Abandonment rate was similar for this outpatient population to those previously reported in the U.S. veteran inpatient population and in other countries. Patients with visual field loss may be more likely to abandon prescribed devices.

[1]  H. Mallot,et al.  Assessment of vision-related quality of life in patients with homonymous visual field defects , 2007, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[2]  N J Rumney,et al.  Outcome of Low Vision Aid Provision: The Effectiveness of a Low Vision Clinic , 1994, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[3]  B. Brorsson,et al.  Quality of life among patients with glaucoma in Sweden. , 2009, Acta ophthalmologica Scandinavica.

[4]  Olga Overbury,et al.  Quebec model for low vision rehabilitation. , 2006, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[5]  Gale R. Watson,et al.  Veterans' Use of Low Vision Devices for Reading , 1997, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[6]  S.Chaturvedi,et al.  GLAUCOMAS IMPACT ON QUALITY-OF-LIFE AND ITS RELATION TO CLINICAL INDICATORS , 2003 .

[7]  R. Harper,et al.  Evaluating the outcomes of low vision rehabilitation , 1999, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[8]  Cynthia Owsley,et al.  Characteristics of low-vision rehabilitation services in the United States. , 2009, Archives of ophthalmology.

[9]  M. Meltzer,et al.  Glaucoma's impact on quality of life and its relation to clinical indicators. A pilot study. , 1998, Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn.).

[10]  R. Klein,et al.  Causes and prevalence of visual impairment among adults in the United States. , 2004, Archives of ophthalmology.

[11]  Robert W Massof A Model of the Prevalence and Incidence of Low Vision and Blindness among Adults in the U.S. , 2002, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[12]  R. Kammer,et al.  Survey of optometric low vision rehabilitation training methods for the moderately visually impaired. , 2007, Optometry.

[13]  E B Mehr,et al.  Parameters in the Use of CCTV's and Optical Aids , 1980, American journal of optometry and physiological optics.

[14]  Roberta McKean-Cowdin,et al.  Severity of visual field loss and health-related quality of life. , 2007, American journal of ophthalmology.

[15]  J. Stelmack,et al.  Quality of Life of Low-Vision Patients and Outcomes of Low-Vision Rehabilitation , 2001, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[16]  S. Trauzettel-Klosinski Rehabilitation for visual disorders. , 2010, Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.

[17]  Gale R. Watson,et al.  National Survey of the Impact of Low Vision Device Use among Veterans , 1997, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[18]  C. Owsley,et al.  Visual Field Defects and Vision-specific Health-related Quality of Life in African Americans and Whites With Glaucoma , 2006, Journal of glaucoma.

[19]  G. Fonda Report of five hundred patients examined for low vision. , 1956, A.M.A. archives of ophthalmology.

[20]  Jeffrey W Jutai,et al.  Age-related macular degeneration and low-vision rehabilitation: a systematic review. , 2008, Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie.

[21]  Chris A. Johnson,et al.  Influence of glaucomatous visual field loss on health-related quality of life. , 1997, Archives of ophthalmology.