Hybrid simulation approach for improving railway capacity and train schedules

Timetable management is one of the operational methodologies commonly applied in the highly structured European rail system to improve the capacity utilization while maintaining acceptable level of service (LOS) parameters; but their potential benefits to the less structured U.S. system have received little attention. The objective of this study was to investigate the use of timetable management features to analyze the trade-off between LOS parameters and capacity utilization in the U.S. The research applies a hybrid simulation approach, where output from RTC, a simulation tool developed in the U.S., was used as an input for timetable compression by RailSys, a simulation tool developed in Europe. 28 scenarios were developed in RailSys to identify a preferred scenario with reasonable LOS parameters while maintaining the capacity utilization under the recommended threshold, and the selected scenario of RailSys was then validated in RTC. The results of the study revealed that 10-min maximum allowed dwell time provided the best corridor capacity utilization. Also, the LOS parameters were significantly improved for total number of stops (55% reduction), total dwell times (80% reduction) and average dwell time (65% reduction); while the timetable duration was increased (capacity utilization was degraded) by 18% compared to the initial schedule.

[1]  Jörn Pachl,et al.  Railway Operation and Control , 2002 .

[2]  Ralf Borndörfer,et al.  Micro-macro transformation of railway networks , 2011, J. Rail Transp. Plan. Manag..

[3]  Thomas Siefer,et al.  Sophisticated Capacity Determination Using Simulation , 2013 .

[4]  Maged Dessouky,et al.  A delay estimation technique for single and double-track railroads , 2010 .

[5]  Hans Sipilä Evaluation of Single Track Timetables Using Simulation , 2014 .

[6]  Mohd Rapik Saat,et al.  IMPACT OF PASSENGER TRAINS IN DOUBLE TRACK NETWORKS , 2012 .

[7]  Miguel A. Salido,et al.  An Assessment of Railway Capacity , 2008 .

[8]  Alex Landex,et al.  Evaluation of railway capacity , 2006 .

[9]  Lance R Grenzeback,et al.  Development of a Rail Freight Demand Model for the National Rail Freight Infrastructure Capacity and Investment Study , 2007 .

[10]  Pasi Lautala,et al.  Railroad capacity tools and methodologies in the U.S. and Europe , 2015 .

[11]  Giovanni Longo,et al.  Approach for Calibrating and Validating the Simulation of Complex Rail Networks , 2013 .

[12]  John Preston,et al.  Profit-Generating Capacity for a Freight Railroad , 2011 .

[13]  C. Tyler Dick,et al.  Siding Spacing and the Incremental Capacity of the Transition From Single to Double Track , 2014 .

[14]  C. Tyler Dick,et al.  Comparison of Capacity Expansion Strategies for Single-Track Railway Lines with Sparse Sidings , 2014 .

[15]  Alex Landex,et al.  Revising the UIC 406 Method: Revenue Generating Capacity , 2010 .

[16]  Pasi Lautala,et al.  Review of Capacity Measurement Methodologies: Similarities and Differences in U.S. and European Railroads , 2013 .