Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communication

This paper examines electronic mail in organizational communication. Based on ideas about how social context cues within a communication setting affect information exchange, it argues that electronic mail does not simply speed up the exchange of information but leads to the exchange of new information as well. In a field study in a Fortune 500 company, we used questionnaire data and actual messages to examine electronic mail communication at all levels of the organization. Based on hypotheses from research on social communication, we explored effects of electronic communication related to self-absorption, status equalization, and uninhibited behavior. Consistent with experimental studies, we found that decreasing social context cues has substantial deregulating effects on communication. And we found that much of the information conveyed through electronic mail was information that would not have been conveyed through another medium. (ELECTRONIC MAIL; INFORMATION EXCHANGE; SOCIAL CONTEXT)

[1]  C. O'Reilly Individuals and Information Overload in Organizations: Is More Necessarily Better? , 1980 .

[2]  Kathleen M. Watson An Analysis of Communication Patterns: A Method for Discriminating Leader and Subordinate Roles , 1982 .

[3]  Stephen I. Cohen,et al.  Information Flow in Research and Development Laboratories. , 1969 .

[4]  R. Johansen,et al.  Computer conferencing. , 1975, Science.

[5]  A. B. Crawford,et al.  SIM Competition Paper: Corporate Electronic Mail - A Communication-Intensive Application of Information Technology , 1982, MIS Q..

[6]  Avi Shlaim Failures in National Intelligence Estimates: The Case of the Yom Kippur War , 1976 .

[7]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Communication networking in computer-conferencing systems: a longitudinal study of group roles and s , 1982 .

[8]  A. Tesser,et al.  On reluctance to communicate undesirable information: The MUM effect. , 1970 .

[9]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Group Communication Networking in an Information Environment: Applying Metric Multidimensional Scaling , 1986 .

[10]  R. Kanter Some Effects of Proportions on Group Life: Skewed Sex Ratios and Responses to Token Women , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[11]  Elizabeth G. Cohen,et al.  Modification of Interracial Interaction Disability: An Application of Status Characteristic Theory , 1972 .

[12]  John Z. De Lorean,et al.  On a clear day you can see General Motors : John Z. de Lorean's look inside the automotive giant , 1979 .

[13]  C. O'Reilly,et al.  Information filtration in organizations: Three experiments , 1974 .

[14]  S. Kiesler,et al.  Response Effects in the Electronic Survey , 1986 .

[15]  A. Vezza,et al.  Applications of information networks , 1978, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[16]  A. L. Beaman,et al.  Effects of deindividuation variables on stealing among Halloween trick-or-treaters. , 1976 .

[17]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Using Electronic Mail for Data Collection in Organizational Research , 1986 .

[18]  Dean C. Barnlund,et al.  Propinquity and Prestige as Determinants of Communication Networks , 1963 .

[19]  J. Singer,et al.  Some aspects of deindividuation: Identification and conformity , 1965 .

[20]  Guy L. Steele,et al.  The hacker's dictionary: a guide to the world of computer wizards , 1983 .

[21]  N. B. Cottrell,et al.  Social facilitation of dominant responses by the presence of an audicence and the mere presence of others. , 1968, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  L. Festinger Informal social communication. , 1950, Psychological review.

[23]  M. Tushman,et al.  Uncertainty, Social Location and Influence in Decision Making: A Sociometric Analysis , 1983 .

[24]  James M. Utterback,et al.  The Effects of Communication on Technological Innovation , 1984 .

[25]  J. Siegel,et al.  Managers' communication and telecommunications technology use , 1988 .

[26]  G. Allison,et al.  Essence of Decision , 1971 .

[27]  Philip H. Dorn,et al.  The Soul of a New Machine , 1982, Annals of the History of Computing.