Material Culture and Embodied Action: Sociological Notes on the Examination of Musical Instruments in Jazz Improvisation

This paper argues that the examination of technologies and their social contexts, which form the basis of the material culture perspective, can be strengthened through an increased awareness of the intersubjective and embodied features of social action. With reference to the ways in which jazz musicians improvise with instruments through embodied praxological skills (Sudnow, 1978) and intersubjective art world knowledge (Becker, 1982), the paper demonstrates the empirical value of these basic sociological concepts. It shows that the ‘affordances’ of usage (Gibson, 1979) that result from social actors' application of objects through orientation to normative procedure become visible through an understanding of embodied habituated social practice, and it is exactly such affordances that constitute the contextual relevance of materiality for social action.

[1]  Graham Button,et al.  Published in: Technology in Working Order: Studies of Work, Interaction, and Technology, , 2022 .

[2]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[3]  Lucy Suchman.  Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[4]  E. Goffman.  The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life , 1959 .

[5]  Jürgen Streeck,et al.  How to do things with things , 1996 .

[6]  Ingrid T. Monson.  Saying Something: Jazz Improvisation and Interaction , 1997 .

[7]  E. C. Hughes,et al.  The sociological eye;: Selected papers , 1971 .

[8]  Carl Knappett,et al.  Photographs, Skeuomorphs and Marionettes , 2002 .

[9]  Pete Martin,et al.  Ways of the Hand: The Organisation of Improvised Conduct , 1979 .

[10]  C. Heath,et al.  Technology and social interaction: the emergence of 'workplace studies'. , 2000, The British journal of sociology.

[11]  Kate Sharpe,et al.  Art and Agency: an Anthropological Theory , 2004, European Journal of Archaeology.

[12]  Ian Hutchby,et al.  Affordances and the Analysis of Technologically Mediated Interaction: , 2003 .

[13]  Jeanette Blomberg,et al.  Working artefacts: ethnomethods of the prototype. , 2002, The British journal of sociology.

[14]  Bruno Nettl,et al.  In the course of performance : studies in the world of musical improvisation , 1999 .

[15]  G. Ryle,et al.  The concept of mind. , 2004, The International journal of psycho-analysis.

[16]  Susan Miller,et al.  Is There a Text in This Class , 1982 .

[17]  D. Edge,et al.  The social shaping of technology , 1988 .

[18]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Phenomenology of perception. , 1978, Science.

[19]  Wes Sharrock,et al.  Computers, Minds and Conduct , 1995 .

[20]  Liz Marr.  Review of The Social Shaping of Technology:Second Edition , 2000 .

[21]  F. Dussart.  Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. , 2000 .

[22]  Antoine Hennion,et al.  An Intermediary Between Production and Consumption: The Producer of Popular Music , 1989 .

[23]  Antoine Hennion.  The production of success: an anti-musicology of the pop song , 1983, Popular Music.

[24]  Bob Anderson,et al.  Can organisations afford knowledge? , 1992, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[25]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  Outline of a Theory of Practice , 2020, On Violence.

[26]  N. Crossley.  The Social Body: Habit, Identity and Desire , 2001 .

[27]  P. Berger,et al.  The Social Construction of Reality , 1966 .

[28]  J. Law.  TECHNOLOGY AND HETEROGENEOUS ENGINEERING: THE CASE OF PORTUGUESE EXPANSION , 2018, SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY STUDIES.

[29]  Siegwart Lindenberg,et al.  The Blackwell companion to major social theorists , 2000 .