Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to describe the problem of achieving “organizational justice” for children within integrated children's services. Justice is understood, following Byers and Rhodes discussion of Levinas as respecting the “unique and indivisible” character of a given child.Design/methodology/approach – The empirical material reported here is drawn from a large study of interagency working in children's services in the UK. Data are taken from Developmental Work Research sessions. Methodological details are outlined in Daniels et al. and Leadbetter et al.Findings – The key finding discussed here is that in order to balance the outcome measures used in children's services, participants use a further abstraction “the outcome of improved outcomes”. The logical and practical consequences of this abstraction are analysed.Originality/value – The paper offers an empirically grounded contribution to conceptual debates about otherness and ethics in organization. In particular, it argues that a c...
[1]
Anne Edwards,et al.
Learning in and for multi‐agency working
,
2007
.
[2]
Carl Rhodes,et al.
Ethics, Alterity, and Organizational Justice
,
2007
.
[3]
H. Daniels,et al.
Professional learning within multi-agency children's services: researching into practice
,
2007
.
[4]
Anne Edwards,et al.
The New Multi‐Agency Working: Collaborating to Prevent the Social Exclusion of Children and Families
,
2004
.
[5]
Randi Markussen,et al.
Reconfigured Medication: Writing Medicine in a Sociotechnical Practice
,
2004
.
[6]
Kalliopi Nikolopoulou,et al.
Homo Sacer: Sovereign Power and Bare Life
,
1998
.