Molecular Imaging of Prostate Cancer.

Prostate cancer is the most common noncutaneous malignancy among men in the Western world. The natural history and clinical course of prostate cancer are markedly diverse, ranging from small indolent intraprostatic lesions to highly aggressive disseminated disease. An understanding of this biologic heterogeneity is considered a necessary requisite in the quest for the adoption of precise and personalized management strategies. Molecular imaging offers the potential for noninvasive assessment of the biologic interactions underpinning prostate carcinogenesis. Currently, numerous molecular imaging probes are in clinical use or undergoing preclinical or clinical evaluation. These probes can be divided into those that image increased cell metabolism, those that target prostate cancer-specific membrane proteins and receptor molecules, and those that bind to the bone matrix adjacent to metastases to bone. The increased metabolism and vascular changes in prostate cancer cells can be evaluated with radiolabeled analogs of choline, acetate, glucose, amino acids, and nucleotides. The androgen receptor, prostate-specific membrane antigen, and gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (ie, bombesin) are overexpressed in prostate cancer and can be targeted by specific radiolabeled imaging probes. Because metastatic prostate cancer cells induce osteoblastic signaling pathways of adjacent bone tissue, bone-seeking radiotracers are sensitive tools for the detection of metastases to bone. Knowledge about the underlying biologic processes responsible for the phenotypes associated with the different stages of prostate cancer allows an appropriate choice of methods and helps avoid pitfalls.

[1]  M. Stampfer,et al.  The high prevalence of undiagnosed prostate cancer at autopsy: implications for epidemiology and treatment of prostate cancer in the Prostate‐specific Antigen‐era , 2015, International journal of cancer.

[2]  F. Mottaghy,et al.  [68Ga]PSMA-HBED uptake mimicking lymph node metastasis in coeliac ganglia: an important pitfall in clinical practice , 2015, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[3]  Y. Fujibayashi,et al.  Acetate/acetyl-CoA metabolism associated with cancer fatty acid synthesis: overview and application. , 2015, Cancer letters.

[4]  P. Choyke,et al.  Anti-1-Amino-3-F-18-Fluorocyclobutane-1-Carboxylic Acid: Physiologic Uptake Patterns, Incidental Findings, and Variants That May Simulate Disease , 2014 .

[5]  S. Groshen,et al.  Comparative performance of PET tracers in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a critical analysis of literature. , 2014, American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging.

[6]  K. Partanen,et al.  Preliminary Clinical Experience of trans-1-Amino-3-(18)F-fluorocyclobutanecarboxylic Acid (anti-(18)F-FACBC) PET/CT Imaging in Prostate Cancer Patients , 2014, BioMed research international.

[7]  Osman Ratib,et al.  Potential of hybrid 18F-fluorocholine PET/MRI for prostate cancer imaging , 2014, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[8]  Serge K. Lyashchenko,et al.  A prospective pilot study of (89)Zr-J591/prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in men with localized prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy. , 2014, The Journal of urology.

[9]  V. Ambrosini,et al.  18F-FACBC compared with 11C-choline PET/CT in patients with biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy: a prospective study in 28 patients. , 2014, Clinical genitourinary cancer.

[10]  S. Larson,et al.  Bone metastases in castration-resistant prostate cancer: associations between morphologic CT patterns, glycolytic activity, and androgen receptor expression on PET and overall survival. , 2014, Radiology.

[11]  K. Kairemo,et al.  Meta-analysis of 11C-choline and 18F-choline PET/CT for management of patients with prostate cancer , 2014, Nuclear medicine communications.

[12]  Jurgen J Fütterer,et al.  Accuracy of multiparametric MRI for prostate cancer detection: a meta-analysis. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[13]  Stavroula Sofou,et al.  Anti–Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Liposomes Loaded with 225Ac for Potential Targeted Antivascular α-Particle Therapy of Cancer , 2014, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  S. Ramin,et al.  Application of 11C‐acetate positron‐emission tomography (PET) imaging in prostate cancer: systematic review and meta‐analysis of the literature , 2013, BJU international.

[15]  M. Gleave,et al.  Targeting amino acid transport in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: effects on cell cycle, cell growth, and tumor development. , 2013, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[16]  F. M. van der Zant,et al.  A literature review of 18F-fluoride PET/CT and 18F-choline or 11C-choline PET/CT for detection of bone metastases in patients with prostate cancer , 2013, Nuclear medicine communications.

[17]  T. Holland-Letz,et al.  Comparison of PET imaging with a 68Ga-labelled PSMA ligand and 18F-choline-based PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer , 2013, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[18]  S. Larson,et al.  Phase I study of ARN-509, a novel antiandrogen, in the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[19]  I. Jambor,et al.  In Vivo Imaging of Prostate Cancer Using [68Ga]-Labeled Bombesin Analog BAY86-7548 , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[20]  S. Groshen,et al.  Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT Parameters as Imaging Biomarkers of Overall Survival in Castrate-Resistant Metastatic Prostate Cancer , 2013, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  E. Mazaris,et al.  Molecular Pathways in Prostate Cancer , 2013, Nephro-urology monthly.

[22]  P. Muzzio,et al.  Utility of choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography for lymph node involvement identification in intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. , 2013, European urology.

[23]  Stanley J. Goldsmith,et al.  Phase II Study of Lutetium-177–Labeled Anti-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Monoclonal Antibody J591 for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer , 2013, Clinical Cancer Research.

[24]  D. Rubello,et al.  Choline PET or PET/CT and Biochemical Relapse of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2013, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[25]  F. Mottaghy,et al.  Evaluation of androgen-induced effects on the uptake of [18F]FDG, [11C]choline and [11C]acetate in an androgen-sensitive and androgen-independent prostate cancer xenograft model , 2013, EJNMMI Research.

[26]  J. Chen,et al.  Role of magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of local prostate cancer recurrence after external beam radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy. , 2013, Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)).

[27]  J. Reubi,et al.  Targeting GRPR in urological cancers—from basic research to clinical application , 2013, Nature Reviews Urology.

[28]  J. Sörensen,et al.  Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI compared with (18)F-NaF PET/CT for detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate carcinoma. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[29]  D. Amadori,et al.  Perspectives on mTOR inhibitors for castration-refractory prostate cancer. , 2012, Current cancer drug targets.

[30]  M. Honer,et al.  Evolution of Bombesin Conjugates for Targeted PET Imaging of Tumors , 2012, PloS one.

[31]  Laurence Collette,et al.  Can whole-body magnetic resonance imaging with diffusion-weighted imaging replace Tc 99m bone scanning and computed tomography for single-step detection of metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer? , 2012, European urology.

[32]  P. Choyke,et al.  11C-Acetate PET/CT in Localized Prostate Cancer: A Study with MRI and Histopathologic Correlation , 2012, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[33]  C. Catalano,et al.  Prostate cancer: 1HMRS-DCEMR at 3T versus [(18)F]choline PET/CT in the detection of local prostate cancer recurrence in men with biochemical progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP). , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[34]  C. Calaminus,et al.  Assessment of PET Tracer Uptake in Hormone-Independent and Hormone-Dependent Xenograft Prostate Cancer Mouse Models , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[35]  C. Kao,et al.  Androgen-independent molecular imaging vectors to detect castration-resistant and metastatic prostate cancer. , 2011, Cancer research.

[36]  G. Bauman,et al.  18F-fluorocholine for prostate cancer imaging: a systematic review of the literature , 2011, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.

[37]  W. Weber,et al.  Evaluation of the GRPR radioantagonist Cu-64-CB-TE2A-AR-06 in mice and men , 2011 .

[38]  N. Satyamurthy,et al.  In Vivo Imaging of Intraprostatic-Specific Gene Transcription by PET , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[39]  D. Mankoff,et al.  C11-Acetate and F-18 FDG PET for Men With Prostate Cancer Bone Metastases: Relative Findings and Response to Therapy , 2011, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[40]  P. Waldenberger,et al.  18F choline PET/CT in the preoperative staging of prostate cancer in patients with intermediate or high risk of extracapsular disease: a prospective study of 130 patients. , 2010, Radiology.

[41]  Y. Fujibayashi,et al.  Tumor uptake of radiolabeled acetate reflects the expression of cytosolic acetyl-CoA synthetase: implications for the mechanism of acetate PET. , 2009, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[42]  Mijin Yun,et al.  The Importance of Acetyl Coenzyme A Synthetase for 11C-Acetate Uptake and Cell Survival in Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[43]  E. Adang,et al.  The diagnostic accuracy of CT and MRI in the staging of pelvic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer: a meta-analysis. , 2008, Clinical radiology.

[44]  S. Gambhir,et al.  Configurations of a two-tiered amplified gene expression system in adenoviral vectors designed to improve the specificity of in vivo prostate cancer imaging , 2008, Gene Therapy.

[45]  S. Kridel,et al.  1-11C-Acetate as a PET Radiopharmaceutical for Imaging Fatty Acid Synthase Expression in Prostate Cancer , 2008, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[46]  S. Kohlfuerst,et al.  The value of 18F-Choline PET/CT in patients with elevated PSA-level and negative prostate needle biopsy for localisation of prostate cancer , 2008, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[47]  O. Muzik,et al.  Tumor Imaging Using 1-(2′-deoxy-2′-18F- Fluoro-β-d-Arabinofuranosyl)Thymine and PET , 2007, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[48]  Aditya Bansal,et al.  Effect of hypoxia on the uptake of [methyl-3H]choline, [1-14C] acetate and [18F]FDG in cultured prostate cancer cells. , 2006, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[49]  G. Lenoir,et al.  Acetyl-CoA Carboxylase α Is Essential to Breast Cancer Cell Survival , 2006 .

[50]  C. Supuran,et al.  Skewing towards neuroendocrine phenotype in high grade or high stage androgen-responsive primary prostate cancer. , 2005, European urology.

[51]  C. Dence,et al.  Positron tomographic assessment of androgen receptors in prostatic carcinoma , 2005, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[52]  G. Jakse,et al.  Expression of glucose transporter 1 (Glut-1) in cell lines and clinical specimens from human prostate adenocarcinoma. , 2004, Anticancer research.

[53]  Prabhjot Kaur,et al.  Correlation of primary tumor prostate-specific membrane antigen expression with disease recurrence in prostate cancer. , 2003, Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research.

[54]  G. D. Vincentis,et al.  99mTc-bombesin detects prostate cancer and invasion of pelvic lymph nodes , 2003, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[55]  F Fazio,et al.  Value of [11C]choline-positron emission tomography for re-staging prostate cancer: a comparison with [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[56]  Nobuyuki Oyama,et al.  11C-acetate PET imaging of prostate cancer: detection of recurrent disease at PSA relapse. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[57]  Jose M. Silva,et al.  Increased choline kinase activity in human breast carcinomas: clinical evidence for a potential novel antitumor strategy , 2002, Oncogene.

[58]  D. Epner,et al.  Methionine restriction induces apoptosis of prostate cancer cells via the c-Jun N-terminal kinase-mediated signaling pathway. , 2002, Cancer letters.

[59]  J. Humm,et al.  Differential Metabolism and Pharmacokinetics of L-[1-(11)C]-Methionine and 2-[(18)F] Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) in Androgen Independent Prostate Cancer. , 1999, Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T.

[60]  D. Bostwick,et al.  Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression is greatest in prostate adenocarcinoma and lymph node metastases. , 1998, Urology.

[61]  M. Bergström,et al.  Positron emission tomography (PET) with 11C-5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostatic adenocarcinoma. , 1997, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[62]  W. Fair,et al.  Expression of the prostate-specific membrane antigen. , 1994, Cancer research.

[63]  J. Clarhaut,et al.  Serotonin and cancer: what is the link? , 2015, Current molecular medicine.

[64]  V. Ambrosini,et al.  Is there a role for 11C-choline PET/CT in the early detection of metastatic disease in surgically treated prostate cancer patients with a mild PSA increase <1.5 ng/ml? , 2010, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[65]  O. Muzik,et al.  Imaging DNA synthesis with [18F]FMAU and positron emission tomography in patients with cancer , 2004, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[66]  Mithat Gonen,et al.  Combined 18F-FDG and 11C-methionine PET scans in patients with newly progressive metastatic prostate cancer. , 2002, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.