Problem formulation improvement for multi-vehicle collision avoidance and impact mitigation

Multi-vehicle longitudinal collision avoidance is a long-standing topic in vehicle control and Active Safety. In our previous work we formulated the multi-vehicle collision avoidance and impact mitigation problem assuming V2V (vehicle-to-vehicle communication) as a finite time horizon Model Predictive Control (MPC) problem. We intended to use the relative kinetic energy between the approaching vehicles as the measure of potential collision impact, which forms a quadratic objective function. However, the constraint representing vehicle approaching was not formulated appropriately, which caused a very stringent constraint to the feasible could set in the optimization at each time step of the sequential quadratic programming resulted from the MPC process. In this paper, we propose two improvements to the problem formulation: one is in the objective function and the other is in constraints. Performance comparisons between those algorithms are conducted to analyze the pros and cons of those two improvements through simulations.

[1]  Azim Eskandarian,et al.  Research advances in intelligent collision avoidance and adaptive cruise control , 2003, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst..

[2]  João Barros,et al.  Large-scale simulation of V2V environments , 2008, SAC '08.

[3]  Fredrik Gustafsson,et al.  Toward Autonomous Collision Avoidance by Steering , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[4]  Fredrik Gustafsson,et al.  Decision Making for Collision Avoidance Systems , 2002 .

[5]  Antonio F. Gómez-Skarmeta,et al.  Architecture and evaluation of a unified V2V and V2I communication system based on cellular networks , 2008, Comput. Commun..

[6]  Jianqiang Wang,et al.  Longitudinal Collision Avoidance and Impact Mitigation Simulation for Different Scenarios , 2012 .

[7]  Tankut Acarman,et al.  A control authority transition system for collision avoidance , 2001, ITSC 2001. 2001 IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems. Proceedings (Cat. No.01TH8585).

[8]  Sidi-Mohammed Senouci,et al.  Experimental Assessment of V2V and I2V Communications , 2007, 2007 IEEE Internatonal Conference on Mobile Adhoc and Sensor Systems.

[9]  Jianqiang Wang,et al.  Multiple-vehicle longitudinal collision avoidance and impact mitigation by active brake control , 2012, 2012 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium.

[10]  Peter J Seiler,et al.  Development of a collision avoidance system , 1998 .

[11]  Huei Peng,et al.  Evaluation of automotive forward collision warning and collision avoidance algorithms , 2005 .

[12]  J. Karl Hedrick,et al.  PRACTICAL STRING STABILITY FOR LONGITUDINAL CONTROL OF AUTOMATED VEHICLES , 2004 .

[13]  Jianqiang Wang,et al.  Application of MPC to Multi-Vehicle Collision Avoidance and Impact Mitigation , 2012 .

[14]  Yasser Morgan Managing DSRC and WAVE Standards Operations in a V2V Scenario , 2010 .

[15]  Kyongsu Yi,et al.  Nonlinear brake control for vehicle CW/CA systems , 2001 .

[16]  Xiao-Yun Lu,et al.  Quantitative testing of a frontal collision warning system for transit buses , 2007 .