Coase, Spatial Pricing and Self -organising Cities

Modern computational techniques offer new horizons for urban economics in the form of agent-based simulation frameworks. This paper reports on a cellular automata (CA) simulation in which urban land transforms on the basis of locally optimal bargaining between developers and local communities (local governments). Because CA is an explicitly spatial modelling methodology, the space-time-specific paths to global equilibrium can be observed. Because it is an atomistic methodology (cells represent decision units), it is suitable for articulating microeconomic theories of urban processes including planning. We present a space-time-specific simulation of cities evolving under two alternative planning regimes. In one, the community has property rights and uses planning conditions, planning gain, impact fees and so on to ensure that each development occurs at a socially optimal density. This is a theoretically simplified rendition of the British development control system-simplified in the sense of acting from a position of perfect knowledge and having a single objective of optimising locational externalities. In the other simulation, developers have the right to develop but the community is allowed to make (rather than receive) compensatory payments in order to achieve socially optimal land-use patterns and densities. Decision-making in both systems is local and socially efficient. However, case-by-case ad hoc development control with compensatory exactions has the effect of steering development to the least-polluting locations. Although socially optimal densities can occur under alternative control regimes (as the second simulation demonstrates), the stylised British development control process acts like a decentralised locational pricing system and, by definition, yields a superior land-use pattern than any other style of planning system. At one level, our model articulates the Coasian invariance theorem-the same partial equilibrium outcome can be achieved whichever way the property rights (over land development) fall. At another level, the results demonstrate that in a spatial resource allocation problem such as land-use planning, global equilibrium is not independent of property rights. The total social product in the urban land economy is greater when the community holds rights over development.

[1]  W. Riker,et al.  The Effects of Zoning and Externalities on the Price of Land: An Empirical Analysis of Monroe County, New York , 1977, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[2]  C. Webster Contractual agreements and neighbourhood evolution , 2001 .

[3]  L. Chung The economics of land-use zoning: a literature review and analysis of the work of Coase , 1994 .

[4]  C. Webster Analytical public-choice planning theory: a response to Poulton , 1998 .

[5]  Alan W. Evans,et al.  'Rabbit Hutches on Postage Stamps': Planning, Development and Political Economy , 1991 .

[6]  Arantxa Etxeverria The Origins of Order , 1993 .

[7]  William J. Stull Community Environment, Zoning, and the Market Value of Single-Family Homes , 1975, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[8]  Roger White,et al.  Cellular Automata and Fractal Urban Form: A Cellular Modelling Approach to the Evolution of Urban Land-Use Patterns , 1993 .

[9]  Chris Webster,et al.  Regulation, Land-Use Mix, and Urban Performance. Part 2: Simulation , 1999 .

[10]  David R. Hill,et al.  Object-Oriented Analysis and Simulation , 1996 .

[11]  P. Hall The containment of urban England , 1974 .

[12]  Peter M. Allen,et al.  Cities And Regions as Evolutionary, Complex Systems , 1997 .

[13]  Master Gardener,et al.  Mathematical games: the fantastic combinations of john conway's new solitaire game "life , 1970 .

[14]  Helen Couclelis,et al.  Cellular Worlds: A Framework for Modeling Micro—Macro Dynamics , 1985 .

[15]  M. Batty New ways of looking at cities , 1995, Nature.

[16]  Tommaso Toffoli,et al.  Cellular Automata Machines , 1987, Complex Syst..

[17]  F. Wu,et al.  Simulation of Land Development through the Integration of Cellular Automata and Multicriteria Evaluation , 1998 .

[18]  Juval Portugali,et al.  Artificial Planning Experience by Means of a Heuristic Cell-Space Model: Simulating International Migration in the Urban Process , 1995 .

[19]  Lawrence W.C. Lai,et al.  Property Rights Justifications for Planning and a Theory of Zoning , 1997 .

[20]  J. Cullingworth,et al.  British Land-use Planning: A Failure to Cope with Change? , 1997 .

[21]  Helen Couclelis,et al.  From Cellular Automata to Urban Models: New Principles for Model Development and Implementation , 1997 .

[22]  Michael Batty,et al.  From Cells to Cities , 1994 .

[23]  M. Pennington Budgets, Bureaucrats and the Containment of Urban England , 1997 .

[24]  J. Meade,et al.  External Economies and Diseconomies in a Competitive Situation , 1952 .

[25]  W. Fischel A Property Rights Approach to Municipal Zoning , 1978 .

[26]  Steven Cheung,et al.  The Fable of the Bees: An Economic Investigation , 1973, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[27]  Chris Webster,et al.  Public Choice, Pigouvian and Coasian Planning Theory , 1998 .

[28]  Catherine S. Elliott,et al.  Readings in public sector economics , 1990 .

[29]  C. Badcock,et al.  Simulating Societies: The Computer Simulation of Social Phenomena , 1995 .

[30]  Chris Webster,et al.  Simulation of natural land use zoning under free-market and incremental development control regimes , 1998 .